Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Developing News Sorting Based On Political Bias

wiredog writes "The Washington Post is reporting that Microsoft is developing a program that classifies news stories according to whether liberal or conservative bloggers are linking to them and also measures the 'emotional intensity' based on the frequency of keywords in the blog posts." If you would like to jump right to the tool you can check out "Blews" on the Microsoft site.

26 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Perfect... by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because we all know that the most effective way to be informed is by only talking with and listening to people you already agree with. /sarcasm

    1. Re:Perfect... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on, where's your engineer's curiosity? This isn't to actually use, it's just a cool technoloogy. Come on admit it, even microsoft can throw together some pretty neat stuff. Besides a lot of people like reading bloggers or watching news relevant to their ideology's interests. For example my parents can't stand CNN because of a percieved liberal bias, so they only watch FOX news. yeah they already agree with everything said but it's still a news source that reports current events and they'd rather get current events from a conservative spin.

    2. Re:Perfect... by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the most interesting and !new! ideas I've seen out of Redmond in a long time. Sadly, that means it's probably an engineer's side project that got mentioned in a meeting and swiped....Or it was designed to keep track of the linux wackos*, and they changed it to watch politics to make it newsworthy.

      -ellie

      * (Myself included.)

    3. Re:Perfect... by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but I don't see where it says this would only give you liberal opinions if you read the liberal-tagged news. On the contrary, it will give you what other liberals blog about, and that is probably more often than not things that they do not agree with.

      Besides, it does say it offers the option to see things "from the other side" by giving you the same story but with the oposite tag, and that could be very useful.

    4. Re:Perfect... by psychodelicacy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this tool would allow you to do that, right? Seems like it could be very useful to those of us who want to know how the other side thinks - whatever that "other side" is. Of course, it would also handily package up the news for those who only want to hear from their own side, but at least it might get them reading more than one source. It's safe to stick to, say, Fox or CNN if you know that's what you like to hear, but if someone were to give you a list of other sites that would probably also suit your perspective it might encourage you to branch out a little more.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    5. Re:Perfect... by garethw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Have to disagree with you there.

      I understand what you're getting at - there's a tendency amonst liberals - as I am admittedly these days - to root for the underdog.

      I'd agree with you if you said anti-Israeli - but I have a problem with equating questioning Israel's policies with being anti-semitic. It smacks of rhetoric when Jewish folk who do so are branded, because anti-Semitic doesn't really make sense - as self-hating Jews.

      Ya know like... say... Einstein. Genuinely - shalom, gareth

      --
      garethw
    6. Re:Perfect... by glavenoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why the loony rants of Obama's pastor of choice for two decades is highly relevant... Of course! Why resort to ad-hominem when ad-hominem-by-proxy is more "orange" than "yellow"?
      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    7. Re:Perfect... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't blame you for trying...

      What bothers me here is, your comment asking us to respect what you're saying got +5 insightful. ElizabethGreene's comment hasn't been modded at all. It's entirely possible that I'll get modded up for pointing this out, and she still won't get modded up.

      So, apparently, Slashdotters care that you're treated fairly, and that you have breasts, but they don't care what you have to say?

      I suppose it's also possible that comment wasn't particularly interesting -- or it wasn't to me, anyway -- but it still bothers me. I guess it's easier when most of us have ambiguous names.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    8. Re:Perfect... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it was Chris Rock who said it best:

      The whole country's got a fucked up mentality. We all got a gang mentality. Republicans are fucking idiots. Democrats are fucking idiots. Conservatives are idiots and liberals are idiots.

      Anyone who makes up their mind before they hear the issue is a fucking fool. Everybody, nah, nah, nah, everybody is so busy wanting to be down with a gang! I'm a conservative! I'm a liberal! I'm a conservative! It's bullshit!

      Be a fucking person. Listen. Let it swirl around your head. Then form your opinion.

      No normal decent person is one thing. OK!?! I got some shit I'm conservative about, I got some shit I'm liberal about. Crime - I'm conservative. Prostitution - I'm liberal.

      Keep in mind, this was a comedy show, and the delivery was actually pretty hilarious. But I think it applies.

      Sorting all news into one thing or another is just an extension of this mentality, and it is harmful. Would you tolerate it if they sorted it into Black News and White News? Or into News for Women, and News for Men? Put the gardening and housekeeping on News for Women, and the tech and business stuff on News for Men...

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    9. Re:Perfect... by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The truth has a liberal bias.

      Only when the listener has a liberal bias.

      It's pithy little witticisms like these that initially made me suspicious of the "intelligent == liberal" paradigm. Intelligence doesn't rely on the appearance of being clever.

  2. That's Microsoft for you. by palegray.net · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Politics aren't nearly partisan enough, Microsoft has to go and encourage further escalation of tensions between the radical left and right. Get your free tub of Microsoft Popcorn(TM) while it's hot!

  3. Not exactly... by boarder8925 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    BLEWS also offers a "see the view from the other side" functionality, enabling a reader to compare different views on the same story from different sides of the political spectrum.
    In reality, most people will use this tool as a quick way to avoid articles they don't want to read. "Opposing/Differing viewpoint? Screw that, moving on!"
    1. Re:Not exactly... by sayfawa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, a lot of people will talk about the 'net as if it's this great thing that gets all kinds of different people together for dialogue and understanding, but in reality it just makes it easier for people with fucked up ideas and values to find each other and convince each other that they are right and everyone else is wrong. It just leads to even more polarization. This MS thing is just a symptom of that.

      And I don't try to pretend that I'm not affected by this phenomena either. The only forums I frequent are technocrat, gentoo otw and here. So it becomes too easy to believe that my views are mainstream and 100% correct. But sometimes I have a moment of clarity and realize that it is only because I'm mostly talking to people with the same views (except for those KDE fuckers) and that they are just reinforcing my predispositions. A good place to go for a reality check is one of those hardcore Christian forums, where the kind of people that we call nutcases hang out, and then realize that we are just as nutty to them as they are to us.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
  4. Manufacturing consent with Power Point by gnutoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This new project highlights the absurdity of our two party system and past media inadequacies. The whole world is reduced to two schools of thought "conservative" and "liberal" with an additional dimension for "emotion". This is perfect for the manufactured consent way of doing things where issues are displayed without depth and championed by more or less annoying, emotional "experts". Rational thought is completely cut off, because anything outside of the "mainstream" represented by the extremes is automatically smeared as the unworkable product of starry eyed idealists or terrorists. So, the complexity of the real world is eliminated and policy is made by those controlling the media. The correct opinion for the good little sheeple will be found right in the middle of the pretty, Vista style chart.

    No thanks, Microsoft, I'll keep reading blogs and thinking for myself. MSNBC never showed me where the good ones were and I doubt they will in the future. You can't run an honest search engine, so there's no way in hell I'll trust your company to tell me how to vote.

    1. Re:Manufacturing consent with Power Point by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're both wealth-destroying Socialists.
      Um... what? Neither the Republican party nor the Democratic party is remotely socialist, by any conceivable stretch of the imagination.

      Come back when you can cite a speech in which any mainstream Republican or Democratic politician has advocated federal ownership of industry, and then we can talk about them being socialist.
    2. Re:Manufacturing consent with Power Point by Plugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mandatory insurance. Government-backed drug prescription programs. State-run schools. There, 3 off the top of my head.

    3. Re:Manufacturing consent with Power Point by volkris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're living in a different world, picking and choosing among facts to support your foregone conclusions. Hopefully someday someone will catch you off guard and some legitimate information will get through. Maybe it will even change your mind.

      Cuba's a fine example: the state of Cuban health care isn't nearly as simple and wonderful as you assert, though by picking and choosing through facts it's easy to see how you could be mislead into thinking that. After all, it's easy for governments to set up their systems to be so misleading.

      But anyway, I'm not seeking to lay it out for you, as I know it's a fool's errand: you're deep enough into denial of reality that I wouldn't be able to reel you back in even if I cared to try. At the least it'd be nice if you kept it to yourself, though.

    4. Re:Manufacturing consent with Power Point by Plugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Socialism is flat-out better than capitalism when it comes to certain areas of the economy, most notably health care, and that's just a fact you're going to have to deal with.
      ... at the point of a gun, 'cause that's how Socialism operates.

  5. Will pro M$ stuff be pushed up? Pro vista stuff by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Will pro M$ stuff be pushed up? Pro vista stuff filled with PR talk will be push over real stories from uses.

  6. Oh come on. by gnutoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a substitute for analysis like a big mac is a substitute for food. The world is far more intersting than a three column spreadsheet and there are always more than two ways to look at any issue. Trusting Microsoft's choice of events and opinions is a sure way to remain ignorant and be guided like sheep to the traditional media slaughter.

    Google does a much better job by scraping titles and sentences coherently. Especially important is their people involved feedback. Trying to force all of that into "Democrat" and "Republican" is worse than useless, it's misleading and that's why Google never did it.

    1. Re:Oh come on. by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're missing the point. I don't think this was ever intended to be a serious tool for political discourse, but rather an interesting exercise in applying some of the technologies being developed by Microsoft's research lab.

      It's a cool technology demo, and perhaps does a nice job of gathering and visualizing a two-dimensional dataset. This was most likely thrown together in a few afternoons as a result of a conversation held over lunch one day that began with "Wouldn't it be neat if we...."

      Similarly, OpenGL wasn't designed to display teapots, although they're quite frequently used to demonstrate its features.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  7. Exactamundo by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People on the both sides believe what they believe and self select evidence that fits their world view, and rejects any evidence to the contrary as lies and propaganda. The purpose of creating or reading a political blog is to get a feeling of belonging with other people agreeing with what you believe.

    Thats why I love slashdot. There are a million idiots, trolls, and very smart people that will challenge anything I say on any topic under the sun. No sacred cows. minimal censorship.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  8. there's no end of interesting US opinions by gnutoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but you won't find those opinions reflected in broadcast news. Try fitting this or this into the "just like the tories" box. Want to bet neither of those two bloggers ever show up in blews? Blews, like broadcast media before it, represents nothing but the will of it's corporate masters. Readers are spoon fed shallow "stories" and false choices that drive public policy in favor of those pulling the strings.

  9. I could be wrong but... by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't NBC already have a patent on this?

    Seriously though, every news outlet in the world has been doing this since before Gutenberg was born. Even Microsoft's idea to tailor it to each user dynamically isn't new. That's been done towards anyone who could have you executed since pre-historic days. Didn't they just rule that making an old idea available over the Internet was not sufficient to receive a patent?

    --
    Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
  10. Great by Locklin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great, software that will make people more close minded, less informed, and just generally less intelligent. Oh wait, did you say it came from Microsoft?

    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  11. There are more than two categories! by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorting news as "liberal" or "conservative"... because there isn't already enough false dichotomization of people's views in modern politics. As long as this keeps up, we're ideologically locking ourselves into a two-party system.