Slashdot Mirror


Arthur C. Clarke Is Dead At 90

Many readers are sending in word that Arthur C. Clarke has died in Sri Lanka. He wrote over 100 books including 2001: A Space Odyssey and Rendezvous With Rama, and popularized the ideas of geosynchronous communications satellites and space elevators.

28 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. shame. by apodyopsis · · Score: 1, Informative

    shame.

    his earlier works were total classics. RIP.

    1. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Light of Other Days. by Bob Shaw

    2. Re:shame. by Ikester8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gah, that movie. The effects were wonderful, but they completely mangled the storyline in order to make an anti-Cold War statement. Do yourself a favor and read the vastly superior book. I read it again every couple of years, it's one of my favorites. The entire message was, "All these worlds are yours except Europa. Attempt no landings there." They also didn't mention the Chinese expedition, and they made the existence of life on Europa inconclusive, unlike the book.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
  2. Coverage from several news sources by Doofus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Coverage from several sources

    AP/Washington Post

    BBC

    LA Times

    Bloomberg

    National Post

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
  3. From TFA by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Clarke's best-known novel, "2001: A Space Odyssey," became the basis of the 1968 film of the same name, directed by Stanley Kubrick."


    It's such a shame, isn't it, that they can't get things right in these articles, even when the slightest research would have shown the writer that the novel Space Odyssey was written as a novelization of the classic movie. The movie itself was based mostly on Clark's short story, The Sentinel. Furrfu!

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They were written in parallel. Clarke also wrote the screenplay.

    2. Re:From TFA by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know; I was simplifying. The movie came out first, and Sir Arthur made sure that the book followed the script as shot, making it, in effect, a novelization.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:From TFA by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, much of the ideas for the story were brought up before filming. Clarke originally wanted the story set on a moon of Saturn, and the book reflects this, but in making the movie the destination was changed to Jupiter for the sake of a shorter running time.

    4. Re:From TFA by invader_vim · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... the slightest research would have shown ... that the novel Space Odyssey was written as a novelization of the classic movie. The movie itself was based mostly on Clark's short story, The Sentinel. Furrfu!

      While you're right about the movie being initially based on the the short story "The Sentinel", Clarke actually wrote the book concurrently with his and Kubrick's work on the screenplay (according to Clarke's introduction in the book). Perhaps that still qualifies as a novelisation of the movie, but in my opinion it sits uniquely in film/book crossovers, since elements of each were affected by decisions (and technical limitations) in the other.



      Regardless, it was a fantastic piece of work by two great artists, both of whom will be sorely missed.

    5. Re:From TFA by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sir Arthur made sure that the book followed the script as shot,
      In the book the Discovery is going to Saturn (with an entire chapter devoted to the funny geology of Iapetus), and it ends with Bowman/Space Fetus blowing up an orbital weapons platform as a way of telling humanity to behave.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  4. 90th Birthday Reflections by _bug_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a video from ACC made in December 2007 in which he reflects upon his life and how he will be remembered.

    His Kipling quote at the end should help bring closure to all his fans.

  5. Huh. by jd · · Score: 4, Informative

    My understanding was that he wrote sections of the book alongside the movie, making the script/book a joint effort, although the book was actually finished and polished later. Well, the only two people who know for certain are now working on a prequel (not available on Earth), from the Monolith's perspective.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  6. City and the Stars... by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...ranks as perhaps the best Sci-Fi book I've ever read. It still takes my breath away.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  7. Re:What the machine might do by dlelash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Asimov wrote the Foundation books, not Clarke.

  8. Re:What the machine might do by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're thinking of Asimov, unless Clarke wrote his very own Foundation series.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  9. Re:All These Novels... by jmv · · Score: 2, Informative
  10. Re:Link for the uninformed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    that cell phone that bounces a signal off the satellites that he envisioned By definition, that's not a cell phone.
  11. Re:He's not dead you earthing fools by RamblinLonghorn · · Score: 2, Informative
  12. Re:What the machine might do by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are two things that disappoint me about many so-called intellectuals. The first is that they don't seem to read enough history.

    Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history.

    Says the guy who doesn't read enough SF to know the difference between Clarke and Asimov.
  13. Re:What the machine might do by Surt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history.

    Perhaps it identifies him as a person who knew history. Or perhaps it identifies you as a person who does not know science fiction.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_series

    The foundation series was written by Isaac Asimov, and he also wrote a number of history books, and in fact his knowledge of history was quite extensive:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Asimov#Other_writing

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  14. Re:All These Novels... by Scaba · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you know what won the Oscar for the best movie of 1969? You might look it up. No one remembers it.

    Uhh, it was Midnight Cowboy. Hardly a forgotten film.

  15. Re:Wasn't A. C. Clarke a pedarist? by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you sure they printed a retraction? There's no citation for this at Wikipedia and never has been.
    Not that it means anything if they didn't but I'm just interested to know their stance. I guess we'll find out when they print their obituary. Try this from the guardian in 2000

    http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/sciencefiction/story/0,6000,374388,00.html

    Rupert and Arthur are good friends. The author of 2001: A Space Odyssey faced his trickiest moment three years ago, when he was turned over by the Sunday Mirror. It was Murdoch who wrote him a "very nice" note promising him that the reporters responsible would never work in Fleet Street again. "He is a rather shy, modest person," Clarke says teasingly. "I find him very deferential."

    The Mirror claimed that Clarke had paid young boys for sex. It produced affidavits from the boys in question. Sri Lankan police later disproved them, he says. The story ran two weeks before Prince Charles flew to Sri Lanka to confer a knighthood on the grand old man of science fiction. The saga was the lowest point in his career. At a banquet in his honour Clarke, who has post polio syndrome, found himself hobbling away from the press, pursued by an unctuous reporter from the Daily Telegraph. The episode still upsets him. "I take an extremely dim view of people mucking about with boys," Clarke says. "The whole thing was distressing to me. It was vindictive and very unpleasant. I can only assume it was a plot to embarrass Prince Charles." The novelist finally got his gong this May, at a low-key ceremony at the British high commission in Colombo.

    Clarke's private life remains a mystery. He was married briefly to an American, Marilyn Mayfield, now dead, whom he met while diving in Florida in the 50s. Asked whether he is gay, Clarke always gives the same puckish pro forma answer: "No, merely cheerful." The answer, presumably, lies in the "Clarkives" - a vast collection of his manuscripts and private writings, to be published 50 years after his death. A further quote
    ""I had an operation for prostate cancer 10 years ago," Clarke says. "I haven't the slightest interest in sex."

    He deserves respect, not anonymous sniping , for his remarkable influence and contributions to humanity.

    Rest in Peace Sir Arthur.
  16. Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin... by ChameleonDave · · Score: 4, Informative

    Requiem im pace, Sir Arthur.

    It's requiescat, if you want to say "[may he] rest in peace", i.e. the traditional RIP.

    If you mean it as a command (as you phrased it), it would be requiesce.

    Requiem is a noun. You could say something like Requiem ei donetur (Rest be granted unto him).

    And of course, it's in, not im.

  17. Re:Loved this quote by him. by MRe_nl · · Score: 1, Informative

    "It's not a frequency we can hear, let me turn up the volume."

    LOL, they said that in Stargate ?

    A C Clark's quote vis a vis technology / magic might be his most well known,
    but the following quote had me grinning ;
    (Of UFOs:) "They tell us absolutely nothing about intelligence elsewhere in the universe, but they do prove how rare it is on Earth."

    Strange in a way for a man who, on the other hand, wished to meet/communicate with ET.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  18. Re:Mortality by compro01 · · Score: 5, Informative

    no. Clarke's three laws.

    1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
    2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
    3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  19. Predicter by GnuDiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arthur Clarke has been behind numerous perceptions and ideas that are commonplace nowadays.

    For example, he is the author of the widely quoted "Sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic".

    As well, he was able to pretty accurately imagine an astounding number of technological advances.

    A loosely re-translated quote from a Russian magazine "Esli"(If), regarding Clarke's 90th birthday:
    "By the way, in the early works of Clarke there is an enormous amount of bold technical predictions, many of which have been realized - or they have every chance to be realized in near future. In the very same "Childhood's End", which is more of a religious-philosophic rather than futurological work, there is the determination of the baby's gender during pregnancy (very similar to nowaday DNA testing), contraception pills, document sending over phone lines with a device which is even named "facsimile device". Among the catalogue of technological predictions it is easy to miss a direct hit on social predictions -- Clarke assumes that socialism as a political order will be extinct by 22th century."

  20. Re:All These Novels... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
    Do you know what won the Oscar for the best movie of 1969? You might look it up. No one remembers it.
    Uhh, it was Midnight Cowboy. Hardly a forgotten film.

    Yeah, but 2001 was released in 1968, the "best picture' that year was the musical "Oliver".

  21. Re:Not Just the Fiction by gsslay · · Score: 4, Informative

    God speed, Mr. Clarke. As an atheist, I'm not sure he'd appreciate your wishes.

    He was a imaginative and intelligent man. He contributed a lot. He's gone, but he's not going anywhere.