Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Says FCC Powerless to Stop P2P Blocking

Nanoboy writes "Even if the FCC finds that Comcast has violated its Internet Policy Statement, it's utterly powerless to do anything about it, according to a recent filing by the cable giant. Comcast argues that Congress has not given the FCC the authority to act, that the Internet Policy Statement doesn't give it the right to deal with the issue, and that any FCC action would violate the Administrative Procedures Act of 1946. '"The congressional policy and agency practice of relying on the marketplace instead of regulation to maximize consumer welfare has been proven by experience (including the Comcast customer experience) to be enormously successful," concludes Comcast VP David L. Cohen's thinly-veiled warning to the FCC, filed on March 11. "Bearing these facts in mind should obviate the need for the Commission to test its legal authority."'"

9 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Is there a lawyer in the house? by explosivejared · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm no lawyer, but here's the wikipedia article on the act in question. Seems to me new ground is being tread here, so I'm not sure how a court would rule. However, such hubris can't make things easier on Comcast. They'd have to be pretty sure to call out the FCC like this. I personally hope Comcast is wrong, but that is another matter.

    --
    I got a catholic block.
  2. I Agree With Comcast by superid · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The congressional policy and agency practice of relying on the marketplace instead of regulation to maximize consumer welfare has been proven by experience (including the Comcast customer experience) to be enormously successful," - Cohen

    I agree completely and will move my "customer experience" from Comcast to Verizon FioS ASAP.

  3. Re:Is there a lawyer in the house? by alexhard · · Score: 3, Informative

    But that's complete bullshit, Comcast has been granted monopolies in the cable market, so they HAVE meddled with the free market (damn communists!). Government meddling is the reason that this problem even exists.

    --
    Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
  4. Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? by j79zlr · · Score: 4, Informative

    the 4mbps that you are "promised" I get 750KB/s download and 125KB/s upload
    750 kB/s == 6 mbps. So you are getting more than you promised, will you be sending Comcast a thank you card?
    --
    I'm not not licking toads.
  5. Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? by GweeDo · · Score: 5, Informative

    "so that you don't ever get the 4mbps that you are "promised" I get 750KB/s download and 125KB/s upload"

    You do know that 750KBps is 5.859375 Mbps right?

  6. Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

    And P2P is horribly disruptive, a single user can easily transmit 20 GB of data in a day. Sure, if they max out 2Mbps of upload bandwidth for 24 hours straight.
    What *Comcast/Verizon/AT&T connection do you have that does a steady 2Mbps up?

    Last I checked, non-business connections were either 384 kbps or 768 kbps, which is about 4GB & 8GB per day respectively. I limit this discussion to Comcast/Verizon/AT&T because those are usually the only options for the vast majority of people in the USA.

    So who are these non-business/non-FIOS users transmitting 20 GB per day?

    http://www.google.com/search?q=20+GB+per+day+in+Kbps
    http://www.google.com/search?q=384+kbps+in+GB+per+day
    http://www.google.com/search?q=768+kbps+in+GB+per+day

    *non-business & non-fiber since comcast can't exactly blame fiber users for running up their bandwidth bill.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  7. Re:Call the *AA? by isaac · · Score: 5, Informative

    Incorrect.

    [snip]

    In other words Comcast's denial of common carrier status is a big mistake, because they are opening themselves to many, many lawsuits because their lines were used (by the customers) to conduct illegal activities.


    Christ, this is 100% wrong. ISPs in the USA ARE NOT COMMON CARRIERS!

    Please stop propagating this myth!

    ISP immunity for subscriber traffic/content comes from Section 230 CDA (yep, that CDA) and the safe-harbor provisions of the DMCA. They don't need or want common carrier status.

    The FCC explicitly classified cable (in 2002) and DSL (in 2005) ISPs as "information services" rather than "telecommunications services" in order to remove any doubt that they were common carriers.

    -Isaac
    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  8. Re:Call the *AA? by cube135 · · Score: 3, Informative
    True, but the safe harbor provision states that a provider is a safe harbor if:

    the transmission, routing, provision of connections, or storage is carried out through an automatic technical process without selection of the material by the service provider; Comcast is selectively blocking certain methods. IANAL, but I think this qualifies as breaking this provision of the act.
  9. Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? by bensode · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let me be the first to say F*CK Comcast. I moved to southern PA recently only to get gouged with a $70 monthly internet bill. I don't have the option to switch to DSL/FIOS so my only other option is dial-up. No thank you. It's funny my neighbors (a lot of them) have a $24.99 monthly Comcast bill. The local ISP just before I moved in (SusCom) was bought out by Comcast http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6279636.html and they get grandfathered into the same price. Any "new" service REQUIRES cable TV + $50 a month internet, totaling $70 a month. I'm an avid DirectTV subscriber because the Comcast cable tv service is absolutely terrible here. So I have to pay for cable tv, internet and DirectTV.

    You know what Comcast told me when I complained about the price, lack of options and their crappy service? "Move". Isn't that wonderful customer service ...

    --
    "Keep at least 3-6 full bottles of hard alcohol on hand, a 2 week resignation notice,..." - Poetmatt