Microsoft Hyper-V Leaves Linux Out In The Cold
whitehartstag writes to mention that Microsoft has announced their new Hyper-V as feature-complete. Unfortunately the list of supported systems is disappointingly short. "No offense to SUSE Enterprise Server crowd, but only providing SUSE support in Hyper-V is a huge mistake. By not supporting Red Hat, Fedora, CentOS, and BSD, Microsoft is telling us Hyper-V is a Microsoft only technology. More Mt. Redmond, Microsoft center of the universe thinking. That's disappointing. Sure, if you are a Microsoft only shop, Hyper-V will be an option for virtualization. But so will VMware and XenServer. But if you run a mixed shop, Hyper-V won't solve your problems alone — you'll have to also add VMware or Xen to your virtualized data center portfolio. Or just go with VMware and Xen and forego Hyper-V."
Buy something that works and screw it up while breaking everything else.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=216934&cid=17629948
but I guess that sentiment applies to all Microsoft products...
Years ago, I told people: Yes, you can use Microsoft software, it is a little buggy, but it sure is cheap.
Nowadays I tell people: Yes, you can use Microsoft software, but it is very buggy and very expensive.
Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
i think it says 32mb. but yes, nifty concept--- and pricey as all get. my organization would love to use it, but can't justify the cost for a nonprofit.
,that is a fraction of the size of a general purpose operating system, providing unmatched security and reliability"
http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/features.html
"Small footprint. Reduce virtualization complexity with ESX Server 3i , a compact 32MB formfactor of ESX Server