Slashdot Mirror


Columbia Holds Wake For Historic Cyclotron

Pickens writes "They called it leviathan, behemoth, Big Bertha. At 12 feet wide, rising 7 feet above the cement floor and weighing an estimated 65 tons, the Columbia cyclotron, the particle accelerator built in the late 1930s by Columbia physicist John Dunning, played a crucial role in the dawn of the nuclear era. Dunning's experiments verified fission, established many of its properties, and, most significantly, demonstrated that the rare isotope Uranium 235, and not the more common U-238, was the more fissionable form of the element. 'In a week or two, they will dismantle it, and they will sell it for scrap,' says George Hamawy, Columbia University's director of radiation safety. 'This is the last chance to see it,' Hamawy added as students held a wake and contractors arrived to remove the cyclotron. 'We're going to make two-thousand-pound sections,' said one contractor before taking the cyclotron's measurements. 'We'll start slicing on Monday.'"

6 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. a piece of history by aleph42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A piece of history has never been so heavy.

    --
    Don't take my posts literally; it's just code to control my botnet.
  2. Mod parent down by aleph42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mod parent down; he's unapropriate (think of the Godwin laws!), completly fails to nail that pathetic pun he might have been aiming for ("owning a piece of history..." would have definitly been better), is unfunny, and most of all he STOLE MY FIRST POST!

    --
    Don't take my posts literally; it's just code to control my botnet.
  3. It was always disposable by jotok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No matter how large, complex, or beautiful anything we make is, it is all essentially disposable. We inevitably attach sentiment to things like cars or houses or boats or gigantic cyclotrons but they are just...things.

    Look, the Navy has all this romantic imagery associated with plying the seas in deadly warships (read "Choosers of the Slain" by Kipling) but almost all ships end up as razor blades or sunk for target practice. Likewise a lot of us have fun tinkering with computers...but over the past 5 years haven't we all broken down and rebuilt assorted Frankenboxes for this project or that project a hundred times over?

    It's the adventure of DOING stuff with the things that is important, not the things themselves. As impressive as the cyclotron is, it's the science and discovery that are really meaningful.

  4. Re:Can it not be preserved? by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some of its parts have been sent to the Smithsonian years ago. All that's left is the magnet.

  5. Re:Can it not be preserved? by spongeworthy · · Score: 4, Informative

    No and no. This is (was) not an enrichment device. It is a research device. You might be thinking of a calutron, which was a primitive enrichment device.

  6. Re:Field strength? by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unless it's a superconducting electromagnet, it's probably not all that strong, especially in comparison to the NMR equipment that's likely being used elsewhere in the building.

    The largest Cyclotron ever built has a main magnet with a field strength of 0.46 T.

    The magnets in your speakers have a field strength of about 1T. Your hard drive probably contains a 1.5T magnet as well.

    An NMR (MRI) machine will range from anywhere from 1.5T to 7T (although experimental setups can go a good bit higher).

    The strongest continuous magnetic field produced in a laboratory is 45T.

    The strongest pulsed magnetic field ever created was by the Russians at 2,800T (they cheated and used explosives).

    The reason the magnet is so "huge" is that the field needs to cover a large area.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose