Slashdot Mirror


China to Use Silver Iodide & Dry Ice to Control the Weather

eldavojohn writes "While we made light of it before, the MIT Review is taking a serious look at China's plans to prevent rain over their open 91,000 seat arena for The Olympics. From the article: 'China's national weather-engineering program is also the world's largest, with approximately 1,500 weather modification professionals directing 30 aircraft and their crews, as well as 37,000 part-time workers — mostly peasant farmers — who are on call to blast away at clouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers.' They plan on demonstrating their ability to control the weather to the rest of the world, and expanding on their abilities in the future."

21 of 387 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmm... by Evil+Al · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
    1. Re:Hmmm... by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 5, Funny

      Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong? Halo with planes. gotta watch the olympics now.

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
  2. And all they need... by AioKits · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is four nosecones from 1960s nuclear weapon technology! HA! I knew it! *hide*

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  3. Wyoming Tested This by dsginter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wyoming has done similar tests (click "listen now").

    --
    More
    1. Re:Wyoming Tested This by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, but in Wyoming, farmers with anti-aircraft guns are called "gun enthusiasts" and they're REALLY firing them off because they're bored. I mean, have you ever driven through Wyoming? I'll tell you, by the time you're to the other side of it, you want to fire off a gun or two just for the excitement.

  4. Also from the article... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Following the announcement in 2001 that the 2008 Games had been awarded to Beijing, the government of the People's Republic initiated $40 billion of new construction there, bringing 120,000 Chinese migrant workers into the city (at about $130 each a month) and triggering a five-year steel shortage worldwide. [...] the Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that 1.5 million of Beijing's natives will have been displaced from their homes by government edict when the Olympics finally begins. This preemptory modernization is of a piece with China's scale, its 1.32 billion population, and the authoritarian control exerted by its Communist central government, which nowadays is dominated by technocrats and engineers who favor mega-projects like the world's largest dam (the Three Gorges dam over the Yangtze River), its highest railway (the Qinghai-Tibet line), and even its biggest Ferris wheel (in Beijing, opening in 2009).

    Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.

    I'm sure someone will try...which just proves that China's subtle information campaigns to attempt to make the world think that everything is rosy or somehow justified are working like a charm.

    1. Re:Also from the article... by tgd · · Score: 5, Informative

      For what its worth, Atlanta did the same thing in 1996. The whole Olympic Centennial Park area, all the new stadiums, etc were all built in former slums occupied by people who were strangely no longer in Atlanta after.

    2. Re:Also from the article... by Jimmy_B · · Score: 5, Informative

      "... The Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that 1.5 million of Beijing's natives will have been displaced from their homes by government edict when the Olympics finally begins." Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.
      Please cite your sources. I tracked down your source, the Center on Housing Rights and Evictions Violator Award - Beijing. From that same article, however,

      The main areas in which evictions have been carried out within the Municipality of Beijing during the period between 2000 and 2007 are neighbourhoods in the four central districts of the capital where overcrowding and old or dangerous housing is common; namely Dongcheng, Xicheng, Chongwen and Xuanwu. Large-scale evictions have also been carried out in several Chengzhongcun (literally, villages in the city), poor informal settlements comprising housing that has not been approved for construction, does not comply with building codes and typically is not properly serviced.
      They aren't evicting people to clear space for new development, they're evicting people from unsafe, overcrowded shanties. Sounds like they should've demolished those buildings a long time ago, but they're just getting around to it now because they don't want the rest of the world to see how bad they were.
    3. Re:Also from the article... by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Informative

      sure, just as soon as someone justify evicting 30 or more families to build a mall or walmart. You do have a point here, but I think you're exaggerating some figures and it's hurting your argument. You claim "30 or more families" are "evict[ed]" from their homes every six months to build a Wal-Mart or a mall. Somehow I doubt this is true for a number of reasons.

      First, the "big box" stores like Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot, etc. try to find unoccupied land when they can because it's cheaper. Sure, in urbanized areas that's difficult or impossible, which is why their second choice is demolishing/renovating older shopping centers, warehouses, and so forth. There's several of these going on within ten miles of my home right now. Again, this is cheaper (and easier on the PR) than going after residential areas. The absolute last choice is a residential area because it's more expensive, more time consuming, and -- as you've noted in your argument -- it pisses people off sometimes.

      Second, I question your use of the term "evict." Evict means they're forcibly parted from their property. This does happen from time to time, and when it does it makes news. There have been documented cases of eminent domain abuse centered around these types of stores, and you're quite right to complain about them. That is your argument: the encroachment on private property rights by local city zoning councils (which are after sales tax dollars) and the businesses they "work" for (who want your sales dollars and pay politicians with campaign contributions). You hurt yourself, though, by claiming it happens "almost every 6 months" to 30 families. The aforementioned abuses are inexcusable, but they are much rarer than you claim.

      Third, you attempt to draw some equivalence between China displacing 1.5M people and our eminent domain abuses. That is a poor analogy for many reasons, not the least of which is that the Chinese have much more limited property rights than Americans do to begin with. Also, using your very own numbers, you claim 30 families are uprooted every six months in the U.S., and you claim it's been going on "for decades." By my calculations on your numbers (numbers I disagree with, BTW), the "fuckers in the USA" displace a maximum of 60 families a year. Assuming 3 people constitutes a family, that's 180 people per year. At this rate it would take over eight thousand years for the "fuckers in the USA" to displace 1.5M people, something the Chinese are doing in far less than a decade. Even that number pales when compared to the relocation required for the Three Gorges Dam project. Yet you seem to have a problem determining the difference in scale, morally equivocating one to the other.

      Like I said, your argument against eminent domain abuses are quite valid, but your exaggeration and hyperbole degenerates your argument into frothing at the mouth. What we're doing with eminent domain abuse in this country is bad, but what's going on in places like China is much, much worse...so much so that it really diminishes the more egregious abuse by trying to link it with the lesser abuse.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  5. Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Chinese government wants to use the Olympics to inject a dose of normalcy into their demeanor, but there is nothing normal about purposely and continually funding a genocide despite the requests and demands of every other nation in the world.

  6. control the air by Tim4444 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now if they could only control pollution...

  7. Re:More money!? by magarity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So overall how much have the chinese spent on the 2008 summer olympics?
     
    Around $2 billion, which is less than a week's trade imbalance with the US. So don't worry, they can afford it easily. Where were the last 10 things made that you bought recently?

  8. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

    So my question is, other than saying "we hosted the olympics in 2009", what benefit is it to them to do so? They could say "We hosted the Olympics in 2008!".
  9. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you look at a list of countries that have hosted the olympic games in modern times, you'll notice that it consists of industrialised nations. By hosting the olympic games, China wants to show the world that they are now a member of the club.

  10. At last.... by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that Polaroid has stopped making photographic films, I was wondering what we were going to do with all those spare silver halides short of flooding the world markets with goth jewellery.

    Now I can sleep happy knowing that the Chinese are going to be spraying them into the atmosphere. I'm not a chemist, but as someone with an interest in photography, I predict a negative effect on our climate which may take some time to develop but will take a whole lot of sodium thiosulfate to fix!

  11. This Reminds Me by Phoenix666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    of three anecdotes about China and the environment.

    The first was from the Lonely Planet's China guide, wherein one of the contributors said he was an avid jogger who moved to Beijing. Upon discovering the poor air quality, he decided it was better for his health to stop jogging.

    The second was the funny and sad story of the fate of songbirds in Beijing. Apparently, Chairman Mao hated them. So he commanded all the citizens of the city to go outside and bang on pots and pans. The birds, scared by the racket, flew around and around until they dropped dead out of the sky from exhaustion. Subsequently, the insect population soared without the birds to keep them in check.

    A reasonable person might have concluded that they should bring back the birds and restore equilibrium, but not Mao. He then decreed that since insects were breeding in the grass and vegetation in the capitol, that everyone should turn out and uproot all the plants and soak the trees down with DDT (a practice which continues to this day, in fact). Then, with no ground-level vegetation around, the city began to experience vexing dust storms.

    The Chinese Communist Party efficiently proclaimed it a consequence of being downwind from the massive Soviet industrial complexes in Siberia.

    The third anecdote involves the Three Gorges Dam. When the it looked like the CCP would put the plans into action, scientists and experts from around the world unanimously proclaimed it a Bad Idea. It would wipe out endangered species. It would erase one of the two greatest cultural and scenic features of China: the Three Gorges are somewhat analogous to the Grand Canyon and have inspired Chinese poets and artists for thousands of years. It would prove ineffective in generating power over the long run due to the rapid silting up of the reservoir. It would dislocate millions of people pushed out by the rising waters. It would create a potential disaster for the people living downstream (including Shanghai, one of the most densely populated cities in the world), because the dam itself was built across several faults.

    But the CCP went ahead, because nature and man must be subsumed beneath the needs of the proletariat. Now it turns out, once the reservoir is filling, that all those concerns were true. For instance, the increased weight of water in the reservoir above the fault lines has accelerated the number of temblors. Also, with restricted water flow, regions downstream are experiencing drought (an unexpected consequence). And with the reduced water flow, pollution has become more concentrated and caused public health problems. And the last unexpected consequence is that the increased water levels in the reservoir have triggered all kinds of landslides.

    In short, China's approach to the environment is nothing short of a disaster. And unhappily for them, the effects of the disaster are immediately felt and born by the rank-and-file Chinese, given the high population density. Yet because of the totalitarian presence of the CCP and its totalizing ideology and propaganda, the country and its people are unable to efficiently evaluate proposals and effectively respond to problems.

    It's sad, because the Chinese are an incredibly inventive and resourceful group. They've given so much to the world. One wonders what they could achieve in a free and open society. But alas, they have, at least for the time being, chosen to handicap themselves with a system that turns all their genius to idiocy.

    The rest of us should observe, and take notes for our own societies.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  12. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by St.Anne · · Score: 5, Funny

    "China must resolutely crush the Rain/Weather forces' conspiracy and sabotaging activities," The People's Daily, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC), said in a hard-hitting commentary on Saturday as Beijing poured in thousands of Chinese troops to assert control in the restive Olympic regions of the country.

    China alleged that the violent weather activities were "masterminded" by the Mother Nature "clique" with the "vicious intention" of undermining the Olympics and splitting China. Mother Nature has denied the charge, and said she is ready for a dialogue with Beijing.

  13. Re:Hmmm...Here We Go Again by The_Wilschon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least now John Fogerty will have an answer to his question.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  14. Not Songbirds Sparrows. by Irvu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What you refer to is the Great Sparrow Campaign which was an attempt to combat a severe grain shortage in China by exterminating airborne and landborne pests that consumed or fouled the grain. Like most large-scale attempts to restructure nature this one failed with ugly ugly consequences. In this case, absent birds to eat them the locust population exploded killing the grain.

    Interestingly enough just at the same time that China was facing this massive grain shortage Russia called in, loans that it had outstanding demanding grain and other food in payment. Rather than Default the communists forced the loans to be paid but that ended whatever positive relationship the two countries had. All through the 80's when people talked of a "Communist Conspiracy" they ignored the fact that after that little stunt the Chinese hated the Russians.

    One possible consequence of cloud seeding may be hinted at in this Guardian article RAF Rainmakers 'caused 1952 flood' Let's hope that isn't the case.

  15. Re:No, they will not by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just build a stadium with a roof?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  16. Re:Sad, funny, History repeating itself by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the 50's Mao had some ideas about what enemies to fight (and mobilize the population against).

    "the country's biggest four evils - rats, flies, mosquitoes and sparrows? "

    Read the article (those of you who don't know this important bit of history so we don't repeat it)

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3371659.stm

    which ended in disaster and famine. Well now its the weather. Too bad the weather in one part of the world effects all other parts, the butterfly effect.

    Between genetic engineering on the "oh it will be alright, we have taken into consideration all the possible consequenses" and massive weather modification (for some games). I think we have made great evolutionary progress towards total survival and total good life for everone forever, don't you?