Amazon Insists Publishers Use Their On-Demand Printer

Lawrence Person writes "According to a story up on Writer's Weekly, Print on Demand publishers are being told to use Amazon's own BookSurge POD printer or else Amazon will disable the 'buy' button for their books. After hemming and hawing, an Amazon/BookSurge rep 'finally admitted that books not converted to BookSurge would have the "buy" button turned off on Amazon.com, just as we'd heard from several other POD publishers who had similar conversations with Amazon/BookSurge representatives... their eventual desire is to have no books from other POD publishers available on Amazon.com.' So much for Amazon's Vision Statement: 'Our vision is to be earth's most customer centric company; to build a place where people can come to find and discover anything they might want to buy online.'"

Comments

Re:Fucking Greed

[Sanat]

Some say we are in Iraq because Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

Some say we are in Iraq because Saddam was willing to take Euro's in place of dollars for his oil... The dollars we would never have had to pay back... we would have just printed more.

Some say we are in Iraq because it has a portal located in it that is a shortcut across the galaxy and we wanted to control it. The other portal being located in Israel.

Some say that great change is upon us and that we should simply allow for it.

You seem to be the kind that should just allow for the great change and be in a space of letting go and remembering why you are upon Earth at this time.

Some say that the changes will be horrific and yet others will find peace. Worry not about others for each will be where they are to be in the correct moments.

Know that greed is a fear... some individuals fear humanity, some fear death, some fear not having enough and there is no limit to any of this.

Don't fall into the trap of believing if others do it then it is OK for you to do it. Follow your heart for it alone knows the way.

Re:Fucking Greed

[Moridineas]

This whole world has basically gone to shit. All we get are news story after news story about how this person or that corporation did something for pure greed. Because that's what people like to hear. Just look at how many articles get posted on slashdot, and how many comments are posted. People love this stuff!!

Gotta get mine -- especially if it makes me a billionaire -- regardless of what it does to anyone else, the environment, or even their own country. Yes, if only there were a system where nobody at all was anti-social, selfish, or chose to work for some reason other than improving the lot of his fellow man. Where everyone worked to his ability to support every other's need! That is truly what we need.

We're fighting a war for, and on behalf of, oil companies. American manufacturers have shipped jobs and technology overseas. The car companies made giant cars knowing full well that they wasted energy and contributed to global warming. Now we have a whole economic sector in crisis due to making loans that people couldn't pay and it is spilling into the rest of the economy. I'll take your word on the oil/gas companies, you must know something I don't. Why is manufacturing overseas necessarily a bad thing? Cheap products are good for Americans too. The car companies make cards people WANT. I for one am thankful that you don't get to control my life (though I guess you want to?)! People taking loans they couldn't afford is equally the fault of people not being personally responsible as it is stupid banks. What annoys me in the discussion is the years of demands that the banking industry help lower income families take out loans to buy homes--when they do and it doesn't work out, it's predatory lending..

Why? Because someone could make a buck off it somehow regardless of what it meant for the long-term health of this country, its citizens, and our economy. Even the world. Ok. Plenty of things have been done and are being done "to make a buck" that are tremendously positive for the long-term health of the country, the world, etc. You're just focusing on the negative because it's easy to do, and that's what people are obsessed with now.

I don't know why I expected anything different from Amazon. What DID you expect from Amazon? I don't get it? They're a business, only that and nothing more.

Re:Amazon is just like all the rest....

[Anonymous Coward]

WOOHA!! What do we have here?! I thought slashdot was all about fat geeks in their parents' basements, not cute bisexual hotties!

Check this out, it's surreal:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/izabael/816210320/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/izabael/2338405479/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/izabael/2163696797/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/izabael/2211238100/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/izabael/2234264582/
http://izabael.com/big_screens/izabael_library_strip.jpg

Very nice, keep it up!

Re:Amazon is just like all the rest....

[Rakishi]

I think you misunderstand. A traditional publisher only accepts those books that meet certain standards of writing quality. This includes, but is not limited to proper spelling, grammar, syntax and appropriate use of the language. It also, probably, includes minimizing the use of the passive voice and advancing the story by showing what happens instead of telling the reader. POD companies, OTOH, accept whatever the writer wants put into print except, in most cases, hate literature. A traditional publisher will work with the writer to correct any flaws in the manuscript and in some cases require scenes to be rewritten, while a POD company simply takes camera ready copy and puts it out. I'm not saying that there aren't good books to be found in the POD lineups -- Piers Anthony has put his entire backlist out via Xlibris -- but the average quality is poor by comparison to that put out by companies who pick and choose their product. You point being? If someone wants to put out a quality book with a POD they simply need to pay someone to do the editing for them. The same is already done with regular self-publishing I believe so it's not exactly uncommon. Likewise vanity presses don't even do much more than dump the book onto the market.

The grandparents point was that the selection part isn't necessary and the number of quality works isn't going to be smaller, possibly. The difference is in who gets you decide what works are quality and what are not.

As far as your not needing a publisher to decide what's good and what's not, last year's National November Novel Writing Contest had 15,335 winners. I doubt that as many as 1% were readable, let alone worth publishing. Would you like to wade through that huge pile of dross looking for the few nuggets of gold? I certainly wouldn't, and I was one of them. No, I'll let literary agents and editors do that for me, TYVM! You mean you actually like every single book published by a major publishing company and read every single one? Or do you have some third party help you select the ones to read instead? I mean I find most of the stuff published to be crap, for my tastes that is, so it'd be sort of idiotic for me to read all of it. Actually I'd be surprised if I'd enjoy even 1% of the books published by any major publisher.

Why should I trust a couple of random people who don't share my tastes? This isn't the 1800s, we can communicate now in an organized and global scale. We have machines to combine information from millions of people to tell you what you'd like based on what they liked. I don't need to wade through all the stuff, I can instead let the hundreds of thousand of other people do it for me. I may take a look at a couple of them for the hell of it but if enough people do so as well then it adds up. I don't even need to find the quality ones now, I can simply let the good ones filter through till they reach me. It's not like most of the stuff I read right now was published after my birth much less this year so it doesn't much matter to me.