Slashdot Mirror


3G iPhone Going Into Production In May

A few folks noted the rumor mill churning over 3G iPhones coming soon. Apparently they might be going into production as early as May, and announced somewhere in the 2nd quarter. Hopefully they manage to stick a GPS and another 16 gigs of memory in this one.

16 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. Re:why by CockMonster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because the iPhone was a flop outside North America.

  2. Don't take away my storage, captain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    A few folks noted the rumor mill churning over 3G iPhones coming soon.

    But my iPhone already has 8 gigs!

  3. Will it have a Paris Hilton news blocker? by Big+Frank · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it did, I'd buy it at any cost!

  4. Re:why by MistaE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think it is so soon. It's already almost been a year since the original came out.
     
    This isn't Apple's other electronic markets, cell phones are updated almost the time, and usually it's not just a "slap a stick of bigger memory on it and call it a day" sort of revision. They need and should be adding more features to compete with the rest of the market.
     
    With that said, I don't understand why the hell people keep begging for GPS, I just feel that there are so many other better self GPS only products that get the job done that Apple shouldn't bother with that market. Besides, if you're shelling out hundreds on an iPhone, I have a feeling you may have a GPS system of some sorts already.

  5. Re:Why does iPhone succeed? by MistaE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never underestimate the power of the 'coolness' factor. Also, you write off the nicer interface as if its somewhat insignificant. That's the CORE component of any consumer electronic market. The public is going to interact with the most part through the interface, if it sucks, they're not going to spend the time to learn it.

    Like it or hate it, you got to admit that the iPhone has a pretty nice interface and it's not too hard to learn. When my mom and aunts, who are in their 40s and not very technologically adept, decided to pick up iPhones and can use them as well as me, you know they're doing something right.

  6. Re:Why does iPhone succeed? by ironwill96 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It all boils down to this: what the iPhone does it does well.

    I have used other smart phones such as the Motorola Q and the Blackberry, but the iPhone is the simplest to use for what I want: easy to access and read e-mail and web browsing and a phone. It also does simple things like work as my calculator, a calendaring system, take notes on it, do alarms, stop-watch, stock quotes, weather and whatever else you download for it now. And oh yeah, it is my iPod too and I synch it with Bluetooth to my car for use as hands-free.

    As someone else already pointed out, the ease of use and interface are the key things that a good smartphone really needs - and Apple succeeded quite well with their first try. Yes, it didn't have 3G or GPS built-in for the first pass at it, but future versions most certainly will. Once they add the rest of those features, i'll be surprised at what people will find to complain about it then. It will probably never have enough memory for the complainers and i'm sure the DRM and device lock-down are also something to continue to complain about, but i'm happy with the phone now just as much (or more than) I was when I bought mine back in September after they lowered the price on it. Now if only AT&T could get some better coverage around where I live :-)

    --
    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
  7. Re:Why does iPhone succeed? by mdwh2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The other reply got modded flamebait, but the spirit of the answer was correct - consider how it's not just marketing from Apple themselves, but from phone shops that promote it, and news media from Slashdot to the BBC. What's this - a news article not about the release of Iphone, but simply a new version supporting a feature that's long been a standard? Most phones don't get a story at all.

    Apple appear to be taking advantage that many people are unaware how almost every phone (even cheap ones) can do Internet access as standard, so they are able to promote it as a new and wonderful thing (even on Slashdot, I see this happening).

    (And it's not clear it has "succeeded" apart from in the sense of not flopping? Sure it's succeeded, but so has the Treo and many other phones, but if you mean been a success above all others, that's not clear at all to me.)

  8. Re:why by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the iPhone was a flop outside North America. And you'll see a lot of comments from Apple fanboi's defending Apple all the way, but here's the truth, uncensored. (Go ahead, mod me down, fanboi trolls) what a lot of North American (like myself) readers don't seem to understand is that while we just got 3G services and phones rolled out within the last 2 years by the likes of Sprint, Verizon, etc., here in the States, abroad, they've had 3G for quite sometime and are completely spoiled by it. In the EU, any smartphone that's not 3G is immediately destined for failure, especially since they're already rolling out '3.5G' and '4G' in Europe, while we think 3G is the newest thing, Europe is already moving on.
  9. Because we one "One gadget to rule them all" by PortHaven · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're tired of...

    "Three PDAs for the Elven Lords
    Seven cell phones for the Dwarf Lords and their halls of stone
    Nine MP3 players for the

    Three Cell Phones for the Elven-kings under the sky,
    Seven PDAs for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
    Nine MP3 players for Mortal Men doomed to die,

    We want...

    One Gadget the Dark Lord on his dark throne
    In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
    One Gadget to rule them all, One Gadget to find them,
    One Gadget to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
    In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

    ***

    (ie: I don't want a separate cell phone, PDA, MP3 player, GPS and batman utility belt. Especially NOT when the technology is available to easily have all 4 in a single device. And the only thing stopping it from happening is BS marketing idiots.)

  10. Why GPS on you cell phone. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because a GPS that network enabled is a great tool.
    Traveling? Want to find a restaurant? Just use your cell with GPS and you can even dial the number and make reservations. Yes auto GPS systems have that but do you carry them in your pocket? When you travel you may or may not have a GPS in your rental car. Yea you could take your portable one with you but what if you don't have a rental car and are just walking? What if you are riding with someone that doesn't have a GPS?
    Again it is always in my pocket. It is the same reason that I have web browser on my phone and a media player.
    It is always with me and it is small and light.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  11. Re:why by Bedemus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what a lot of North American (like myself) readers don't seem to understand is that while we just got 3G services and phones rolled out within the last 2 years by the likes of Sprint, Verizon, etc., here in the States, abroad, they've had 3G for quite sometime and are completely spoiled by it. In the EU, any smartphone that's not 3G is immediately destined for failure, especially since they're already rolling out '3.5G' and '4G' in Europe, while we think 3G is the newest thing, Europe is already moving on. What a lot of North American readers (like yourself) don't seem to understand is that the population density in the countries where 3G coverage is widespread justifies that widespread deployment of 3G technology by giving companies a speedier return on their investment.

    Such is the case for most of the connectivity technologies that see more rapid adoption overseas. There are large areas of the USA that are simply not densely populated enough to justify the expense of rolling out cutting-edge networks there. It isn't a matter of the US simply being behind the technological curve, as some like to assume.

    Pardon the PHB nature of this next statement, but these are the types of differences that turn a 3 year ROI into a 10 year ROI, and slow down adoption.
  12. Re:Why does iPhone succeed? by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPhone could be equipped with a perpetual motion machine and a love ray that instantly seduces any woman it is aimed at, and some people would still complain that it doesn't support MMS, and thus they would rather have their free flip phone.

    Don't underestimate the power of the dark side.

    --
    "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
  13. Re:Why does iPhone succeed? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple appear to be taking advantage that many people are unaware how almost every phone (even cheap ones) can do Internet access as standard, so they are able to promote it as a new and wonderful thing (even on Slashdot, I see this happening).

    I'm sure they're also attracting the people that have tried out the browsers on their phones, and found them so painful to use that they've just given up. I'm one of them - I never use the browser on my Samsung Z560 unless I really have to. In contrast, I'll browse the web on my iPod Touch quite happily - it's not as good as a desktop browser, but it's not that far off.

    In fact, I was ranting to my boss just now about the fact that my phone browser forgets cookies when the browser is closed (which happens every time you close the clamshell, annoyingly). It's particularly apparent when using PayPal Mobile, which shows you a regular login page by default. You can opt to log in using your mobile number and a PIN, and if you've got the cookie you'll be automatically redirected. Mine, unfortunately, forgets the cookie.

  14. Re:why by Seahawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    So - what is the reason for not having 3G on the east and west coast of USA? I would guess the population density there is comparable to most of Europe.

    And don't think we have 100% 3G coverage over here(Denmark) - far from it. I would guess by area we're around 40%(Complete guesstimate), but coverage by population is at least 80% - I see nothing that prevents USA from doing something similar.

  15. Re:Why does iPhone succeed? by Pretor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll give you several

    1: Ease of use.
    2: High quality software - few software bugs
    3: Ipod
    4: Very good web browser
    5: Some very nice third party software (if you jailbrake it)

    I've also have a Nokia E90 - so I'm able to compare my iPhone to a more feature full phone. This is a phone that has almost all the features that you could imagine. 3.5G, GPS, SIP client, multi megapixel camera, keyboard and etc. This is similar to other expensive Nokia phones.

    The problems with the Nokia phones are:

    1. Several different confusing menus - the series 60 is awful to use
    2. Lots and lots of bugs, several that freezes the phones
    3. Terrible multimedia software
    4: Good web browser with bad user interface. Nokia calls it Safari (webkit) based, but the interface is miles away from the iPhone

    Yes my Nokia E90 has it bright spots. For example I bring it along on my travels because of it's GPS and its SIP client. Additionally the keyboard makes it nice using ssh to check problems with servers and etc. And it's really nice to have 3.5G Internet access. But since it's awful to use as a day to day phone it's mostly left at home.

    BTW: I live in Oslo, the main capital of Norway. An area with very good 3G and 3.5G coverage. So I know what I'm missing with just the EDGE network.

  16. Re:why by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude.. You live in Chicago, it's a grid, lucky you. Try to find your way around Houston or New Orleans without help sometime. It's a bona fide nightmare. New Orleans has streets that are parallel in one place and intersect in others, they call it a the "Crescent City" for a reason. It also has streets change names at random places for reasons that, while historically interesting, make no navigational sense. New Orleans is a bit unique by any standard, but most of what I like to call the "post-WW II Southern Cities" are huge sprawling things with little planning and often several "downtown areas" interspersed with residential subdivisions and bedroom communities. I've been to New York and Chicago, their well planned grid and awesome public transportation are things to be envied... Most of us do, because we don't have them.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.