Slashdot Mirror


Micro-Projectors May Bring YouTube On-The-Go

An anonymous reader writes "A tiny portable projector, about the size of a pack of cards, may soon replace a ring tone as the most annoying thing on the train or bus. These technical innovations can project an image up to 50 inches in size in dark lighting, making them ideal for on-the-road business presentations. They can also be hooked up to cell phones or media devices, though, possibly introducing a whole new level of social intrusion into US culture. 'Digital projectors were once bulky. These new models, though, are small enough to fit into the pocket of consumers who want a big-screen experience from a small-screen device. Some of the models are expected to be on the market by year-end, or sooner. Prices have yet to be announced. Matthew S. Brennesholtz, an analyst at Insight Media, a marketing research firm in Norwalk, Conn., says he thinks the projectors will initially cost about $350, then quickly drop to less than $300.'"

143 comments

  1. Cool. What about tv? by electrictroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can I connect this thing to my HD DVD player? At $300 it's cheaper than buying a real 40 inch screen.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  2. Just a question. by Romancer · · Score: 1

    How many mini projectors will have to "be comming soon" to get the editors to stop posting these stories?

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:Just a question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      42

    2. Re:Just a question. by doc_doofus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Offtopic my hairy arse. How is answering a question, regardless of the answer or question, offtopic?
      42 is afterall, THE answer.
      Sheesh, turn in your mod points, you're no nerd.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Answer_to_Life,_the_Universe,_and_Everything 42

      --
      Disclaimer:IANAL/MD/PhD-Just the local yokel PC "doc" ~If you're not having fun, then you are probably doing it wrong.
    3. Re:Just a question. by swb · · Score: 1

      Wasn't some kind of laser-based model that could be embedded in a PDA or cell phone coming soon, too?

      I seem to remember it being monochrome or possibly even color using multiple lasers or a colorwheel ala DLP.

      I agree completely, though, that these seem to be hitting 10 on the BS meter since they never come out.

    4. Re:Just a question. by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

      Yup... there was....

      microvision.com

      I'd love to see it in the real world...

    5. Re:Just a question. by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      A fully functioning prototype of a normal sized cell phone with an embedded laser projector is being shown to wireless carriers this week at the wireless show in Las Vegas: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080331/20080331005572.html?.v=1

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  3. Convenient! by Stanistani · · Score: 2, Funny

    If one is used in a movie theater, it's just the right size to crush under one's heel.

  4. Didn't I read about these before? by Paranatural · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure it was on /., too.

    In any case, I, personally, can't wait for these. This, along with a sufficient Video Ipod, means I can take my music, videos, ebooks, and whatever else I want with me all for the size of a couple of packs of cigs. Excellent.

    1. Re:Didn't I read about these before? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      ...and whatever else I want with me all for the size of a couple of packs of cigs Gee, I heard you can trade cigs like money in prison because you held a public viewing of copyrighted movies.

      Just sayin'...
      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
  5. Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd definitely get one of these to use at work. Sometimes I find myself in a meeting with a few people in a place with no projectors, so it'd be useful to be able to go over something that could be kept in my pocket, ready to sue at a moments notice. This is especially useful since my employer is stingy with the number of conference rooms with projectors.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Funny

      ready to sue at a moments notice. RIAA, is that you?
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      "so it'd be useful to be able to go over something that could be kept in my pocket, ready to sue at a moments notice."

      Pocket lawyer!

      --
      FGD 135
    3. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ready to sue at a moments notice

      Great. Another lawyer on Slashdot. Just what we needed.

    4. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by Minwee · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not an April fool's joke.. I saw one of these being demonstrated with an iPod at MWC this year (actually, at a restaurant on a napkin).

    6. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you are your co-workers worst nightmare, no doubt. someone who thinks everyone else *wants* to see your powerpoint presentations and listen to your prattling on about them.

    7. Re:Assuming that it isn't a 4/1 joke... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      talk of these projectors has been going on for a long time so it would make a crappy april fools joke.

      would be fun on trips.. combined with modern cellphones with tv-out. quake on the go!(n95 has tvout and can play quake, though, a bluetooth keyboard is pretty much a must(can play ok quality video to tv too, h264).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  6. Never gonna give up my monitor by Arnonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The submitter could at least have linked to the YouTube Video of the projector prototype.

    1. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by cloricus · · Score: 1

      My mouse hoverover saw what you did there. >.

      --
      I ate your fish.
    2. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, a projector isn't a substitute for a monitor, the same goes for the reverse too. It just depends on what you want to do with it.

    3. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Idiot mods. Before you mod something up, at least check the link to make sure you're not being rickrolled.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      ENOUGH ALREADY!

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    5. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, I haven't memorized the rick astley youtube links yet. But when it came up, I did what any sane person should do and quickly turned on my speakers.

      You really don't want to miss the opportunity when it happens. You never know when you will be rickrolled next!

    6. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by MBCook · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps that did check the link, and thought the Informative would be funnier than the Funny.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I didn't expect the video resolution to be that good. Thanks for the link.

    8. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by Otter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      The humor of this "rickrolled" thing is completely lost on me. You say "Here's a link to a YouTube video" and OMTFG it's a Rick Astley clip! Who the hell cares? At least with goatse.cx there was a genuine element of tricking people.

      Perhaps the joke is in the 80's music, but I spend all day listening to Duran Duran and Fastway anyway...

    9. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      LOL - nice troll.

      Given that it's Rick Astley, and there's an option to 'watch this video in higher quality' on the page, I take it that the high quality version has no Stock, Aitken, Waterman content :o)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    10. Re:Never gonna give up my monitor by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that links to 'higher quality' would take you off of YouTube.

  7. happy april's fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post from osama bin laden!

  8. Exploding pockets 2.0 by techpawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, how hot will the bulbs in these pocket projectors get?
    I smell a market for a project projector protector!

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:Exploding pockets 2.0 by Zashi · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but the thing doesn't use bulbs (thankfully) it uses LEDs and/or lasers. I've been tracking the development of these projectors for a while (namely, the PicoP) and am hoping they do a a big, high res Home Theatre version. Even if it winds up costing as much as the traditional HD Theatre having a 10,000 to 100,000+ Hour life versus a 2,000 hour life on a $350 bulb makes these projectors much more attractive. Also, since lasers are being used you never need to adjust the focus. Sweet!

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    2. Re:Exploding pockets 2.0 by esampson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but real geeks will keep these in their shirt pockets, requiring a project projector pocket protector.

  9. any surface? by Lxy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because nothing says professional like holding a sales meeting presentation on a manilla folder or a NAPKIN.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:any surface? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      woah woah woah, you've got it all wrong. That's not how you make sales. You make sales by bringing the hot new intern and projecting the presentation on her front / backside (depending upon the clients preference, of course).

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:any surface? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohhh! The Tummy Projector (TM) !!!

      And with appropriate image processing/stretching, you could have a normal image appear when it is projected on a form with, er, uh, protuberances!

      Just key in her measurements instead of trying to adjust keystone and everyone has a great time!

      I'm thinking something like that would sell... ;-)

    3. Re:any surface? by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      Already been done:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww4L_O6Lqig

      That's someone playing around with a laser pocket projector at a club in Vegas during CES.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  10. wha? by doti · · Score: 1

    what does youtube has to do with this story?

    there are plenty other better uses for this tech.

    --
    factor 966971: 966971
    1. Re:wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      redtube, pornotube... endless posibilities

    2. Re:wha? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      With a feedback video camera to detect the "screen"'s location, position, and shape-distortion, plus some serious processor power, you could texture map any costume (or lack thereof) on a moving body (with sufficiently light-colored clothing). Cancel out the existing clothing's coloration, too.

      Now THERE's an April Fool prank - that could get you fired, sued, and/or jailed.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  11. Damnit. by Sam1230 · · Score: 1

    Great, now I'll be forced to watch hordes of reality shows and Blade movies. How much constant stimulation do people need? Seriously. I have ADD and have no trouble sitting somewhere quietly and just pondering things. Why do so many other people seem to? In most cases, there's absolutely no need to always be in constant communication with people through text messaging or watching Internet memes on the bus, or somewhere else where you're equally annoying other people. The Internet will still be there when you get home.

    1. Re:Damnit. by garett_spencley · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The Internet will still be there when you get home."

      But ... what if it isn't ?

      My world would fall apart if I missed the next Obama Girl video. I can't risk it. Sorry.

    2. Re:Damnit. by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, dude - it's going to be endless manga and anime. I pity the poor high school teachers who will have to put up with that between classes and worse - during.

    3. Re:Damnit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how this is much different for personal media viewing than an MP3 player with a full color display like the current iPods. Sure, the screen can be a bit bigger, but that does not sound major. I think the real application for these is for multiple people watching a presentation (or TV show).

  12. I like this story! by sm62704 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's much better than the April Fool's jokes I submitted.

    What? You're serious?

    projectors will initially cost about $350, then quickly drop to less than $300.'"

    Yeah, right. One that's as big as a kid's lunch box is thousands now. Well, let's see if we can find a link or two.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:I like this story! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      The actual article linked to is dated the 30th, so unless it's now SOP to disguise your april fools jokes by faking a date, this is probably for real.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:I like this story! by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 1

      Knowing the speed of the slashdot editors - we probably won't get the April Fool's jokes until May.

  13. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Informative

    At $300, it's probably VGA or SVGA res, good enough for DVD, but blow it up too large and you'll be seeing the gaps between the pixels. HD projectors run over $1000. A good 1080p projector can be had for about $2000 now, and they're generally quite beautiful.

  14. Re:Cool. What about tv? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1, Informative

    I went to TFA to check the resolution of the projectors in question, only to find that TFA had no data whatsoever on that topic.

    Without data on resolution, it's kinda pointless to discuss these things. Talk about vaporware...

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  15. how much light? by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Informative

    Until now, projectors needed ungodly amounts of light to project an image bright enough to be usable in a non-darkened room. Either these miniprojectors use some kind of superefficient light source, or that 60" image can only be seen in total darkness.

    1. Re:how much light? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Informative

      Weeeeell, that is part of the second paragraph of TFA. It says that the 60" image can only be seen in dark rooms while a 7"-20" image can be seen with some ambient light.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:how much light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either these miniprojectors use some kind of superefficient light source, or that 60" image can only be seen in total darkness.


      Like, I dunno, Diode Lasers?
    3. Re:how much light? by Solandri · · Score: 1
      Contemporary projectors require ungodly amounts of light because they're horribly inefficient. They're generating a broad-spectrum light (basically light at all visible wavelengths plus some) from an incandescent light source. That's already converting probably 90% of the energy into heat. Then they're running it through (for DLP) three color filters in sequence, so convert on average 67% more of the light energy into heat. Then each filter removes everything except a narrow band of red, green, or blue, so throw away maybe another 80% or so. Finally, the optics don't have perfect transmission, and will scatter some light sideways (the reason why the projector lens looks bright when viewed from the side), so throw away another 5% or so. So if my math is right 10% * 33% * 20% * 95% = ~0.6% of the energy that goes into producing the light actually gets displayed on the screen, the rest becomes heat.

      By using something like diode lasers as your light source, you can produce only the narrow band of red, green, or blue you need, only when you need it, and only where you need it. Thus no waste light which gets converted into heat.

    4. Re:how much light? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Thus no waste light which gets converted into heat.
      Most of it would still be wasted if you're bouncing it off a screen, since it reflects off on some other direction than through your pupil.

      Diode lasers beaming onto the lens of your eye (instead of a screen), now you're getting somewhere.

      But then there's still direct optic nerve stimulation... that would be neat for a lot of reasons. Re-purposing the highest bandwidth link into your brain has endless possibilities.

    5. Re:how much light? by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

      I saw one of these in use a few weeks ago by one of our VPs. He was walking around the room showing his presentation on the walls and ceiling. It was kind of difficult to see compared to the normal projector that was in use. He said the first generation is a little dim, but the second generation for release should be brighter. He also mentioned that you really can't tell a difference in a dark room--we were in a conference room with the lights on.

      I didn't get a good look at it, but it must have some sort of storage on it. His wasn't connected to his computer, but he was scrolling through different slides.

      --
      [ ]
  16. Physics by dj245 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can't break the laws of physics. If you want a bright image you need to draw a lot of power. Even if you go with very efficient LEDs, the battery life on these things is going to be terrible.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Physics by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can't break the laws of physics.
      Damn it Scotty, I need 6000 lumens on the side of this mountain playing Moulin Rouge. I don't care how you do it but get me those lumens mister, that's an order. Kirk out.
      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    2. Re:Physics by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      "You can't break the laws of physics."

      Prove it.

    3. Re:Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't break the laws of physics. If you want a bright image you need to draw a lot of power. Even if you go with very efficient LEDs, the battery life on these things is going to be terrible. With a laser projector, you could project the image directly on your retina, which is tiny. Bright image, low power, no laws of physics broken.

      wcoenen
    4. Re:Physics by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Hey, I went faster than the speed of light tomorrow.

      Now I just have to wait for all of the rest of the world to catch up.

    5. Re:Physics by PPH · · Score: 1

      Its April 1. Didn' they mention the RTG power pack?

      Ita a cell phone! No, It's a hand-warmer!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Physics by Strange+Quark+Star · · Score: 1

      It may be more efficient than you think, it employs a fundamentally different design.
      Instead of shining light from a bulb through a LCD screen you have 3 lasers coalesce into one beam and draw each pixel on the wall or wherever.
      So no energy is wasted, all the power goes directly to the screen.

      Of course the power consumption will still be high for a bright picture, but far lower than that of conventional projectors.

      --
      There is no sig.
    7. Re:Physics by ne0n · · Score: 1

      IIRC the pocket projector comes with built-in nuclear power generation so you'll need a bit of external cooling capacity, but then you don't need batteries at all. Costco already has a contract to bring these out in September.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    8. Re:Physics by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      Well a lot of it is about contrast really. The ambient light screws up the contrast because the blacks are no longer very black. There are screens available that try to eliminate ambient light by only reflecting very narrow red green and blue wavelengths which correspond to the output of certain projectors. Of course, that means you'd have to carry a screen around with you.

      For the personal big screen experience I really think video goggles make a lot more sense. The Indicube will be released soon. It's a portable video player that uses video goggles rather than a screen. The apparent screen size will be something like a 17 inch monitor on your desk with a 800x600 resolution. That's a lot better than any other portable video player I know of. Also, it can only be a matter of time before they offer a 1080p resolution with an even wider field of view.

    9. Re:Physics by AJWM · · Score: 1

      "Aye, Captain. We'll detune to the main phaser banks to 'illuminate', raster the beam and feed in the modulation signal via the main plasma conduit."
      "Well done, Scotty!"
      "But I must warn ye, Captain, if we pause the image it'll be etched into the side o' the mountain like a giant bas relief..."

      --
      -- Alastair
    10. Re:Physics by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      I'm not totally clear yet, but I think we're looking at two different miniature projector technologies.

      One of which uses 3 lasers (RGB) and a single mirror directly project the image.

      The other, which I'm fuzzy on, claims to use DLP, and presumably a bulb of some sort.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    11. Re:Physics by marciot · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. There is a lot of room for improvement when you consider that a typical projector puts out the same amount of light when it is displaying a dark image as it does when it is projecting a field of pure white -- just that in the former case the light is absorbed (by the LCD) and is transformed into waste heat. An LCD based pocket projector would have the same problem, but I imagine that in the future, pocket projectors could dispense of the LCD altogether and use a grid of LEDs (one for each pixel) which would shine only as bright as they need to be, and consume no energy at all when displaying black.

      AFAIK, some pocket projectors, which use lasers rather than LEDs, already are able to achieve this economy (I think they use a scanning, modulated laser to paint the image only where it is light).

      -- Marcio

  17. Ultimate ultra-portable by shewfig · · Score: 1

    Combine this in a single case with a CPU and a laser keyboard and it's the ultimate ultra-portable. On an airline tray table, take out the small box, which projects the image on the back of the seat in front of you, and the keyboard on the tray itself.

    As component miniaturization continues, the limiting factors in ultraportables are increasingly the human interfaces - the screen and the keyboard.

  18. Old news. by odin84gk · · Score: 5, Informative
    I will believe it when I see it at Best Buy.

    This has been out there since 2007 http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/08/hands-on-with-microvisions-itty-bitty-projector/

    And even in 2006. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/06/70942

    1. Re:Old news. by linuxguy1454 · · Score: 1

      There is also these guys from the UK http://www.lightblueoptics.com/news/070108.htm working on a miniature laser-based full color projector.

  19. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Informative

    At $300, it's probably VGA or SVGA res For youtube its probably QVGA (320x240) same as VHS, and good enough for a mobile phone.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  20. April fool's day? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    What happened to typical slashdot April Fool's Day?

    All these serious threads are putting me to sleep. Quick, hook me up with something goofy!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:April fool's day? by garett_spencley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "What happened to typical slashdot April Fool's Day?"

      Why that *IS* the April Fools joke silly!

      Everybody was waiting for their April Fools day jokes only to find no jokes. Hah, April Fools !

    2. Re:April fool's day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently there was a lawsuit last year.

    3. Re:April fool's day? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

      The joke is that Taco and Zonk are logged in and working under each others' usernames. Those scamps!

    4. Re:April fool's day? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      No, I think the editors just got sick of all the complaints about how lame their past April Fool's jokes were that they decided it wasn't worth the effort.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  21. Real Stories??? by midifarm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    what ever happened to OMG Ponies!!!

    1. Re:Real Stories??? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      yeah - I was a bit bummed too. I had read about this previously in PopSci, and I doubt it was the April fools article (not even sure if that was from the April issue).

      Slashdot apparently wants to be taken as seriously. /me pines for a bygone era... and is eaten by a grue

    2. Re:Real Stories??? by ne0n · · Score: 1

      sure, a pocket-sized, internally powered device with the juice to project a picture 50" wide on the subway while plugged into your phone... that couldn't possibly be April 1, could it?

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    3. Re:Real Stories??? by Garridan · · Score: 1

      ...that couldn't possibly be April 1, could it? Not when people have been talking about it since mid February.

      http://google.com/search?q=Samsung+MBP-100

      This Iljin company has been talking about their projectors since mid April of last year (so while this might be vaporware, it's not a prank.

      http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/iljin-display-develops-coin+sized-laser-projector-module-167323.php

  22. Just what I need by AioKits · · Score: 1

    The You Tube Ipecac Challenge displayed in a public setting. I can't wait!

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  23. Finally! by GottliebPins · · Score: 1

    Finally pocket pr0n!

  24. what makes 'em possible? half-bit encoding. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    no other way to get all those half-bit movies that are being released into that small amount of memory, except using half-bit encoding.

    only problem is, the tiny projectors play 'em half-fast.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  25. Small enough to embed descreetly in a small droid? by Starturtle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Help me Obi-wan Kenobi you're my only hope.

  26. TCO by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Before you buy into "$300" you want to ask what the bulb lifetime is and how much the replacements will cost - because it wouldn't surprise me if the replacement bulb were to cost more than the projector and last a year or two. Think ink cartridges: projectors follow a similar economic model.

    1. Re:TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The article says that this nonexistent product uses a LED or laser. Those both last a lot longer that an incandescent light bulb.

    2. Re:TCO by dtfusion · · Score: 2, Informative

      They use lasers and lcds. The lifetime should be quite long. No bulbs to replace. They're even talking about fitting these things into smart phones eventually. With a market that size the cost should truly be under $300.

  27. Re:Cool. What about tv? by odin84gk · · Score: 5, Informative
    Some research dug this up:

    The projector outputs images at 848 by 480 pixels (WVGA) http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/006250.html
  28. Re:Small enough to embed descreetly in a small dro by BoogeyOfTheMan · · Score: 1

    Hehehe. A Star Wars cosplayers dream come true. Think how much more authentic your R2 costume could be with one of these.

  29. Re:Cool. What about tv? by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    VHS is actually double that resolution (320 across x 486 scanlines).

    Thanks for the info on the HD Projectors.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  30. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

    Equally annoying when an article discusses new images of something yet never produces the images, only discusses them.

    --
    ~ Ron Fitzgerald
  31. Frying the Projectors by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I have a very powerful laser pointer. If someone's using one of these projectors annoyingly in public, I will just zap all over their picture. Perhaps from hundreds of feet away.

    If they try to get tough, I'll just dial the laser up to "stun".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  32. bugger that. by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    bugger that.

    what I want is its big brother that can project HD image on the opposite wall, bright enough for normal viewing and about the size of a large book so I can hide it in the bookshelves on one side of the room and have a discreet drop down on the other. a small wireless remote could control the whole shebang.

    or maybe what I want is the projector built into the lid or case of my laptop so I can project an image for 21" use in my hotel room or presentation, why would I want to carry another gadget?

    or maybe I want the low resolution table top clock that can also project information, headlines, travel and weather onto my bedroom ceiling on a spoken command.

    perhaps I want the discreet projector that can shine instructions or notes onto the smoked glass door in my hi tech corporate office. or airport. or train station.

    why would I not want my sat nav to project onto my windscreen HUD like and stop me dangerously craning my neck to look at a 3" screen when I should be driving. while its at it, it can show key dashboard information as well.

    what I absolutely do *not* need is a phone that can project images when hooked up to a matchbox - its a phone, thats all.

    I like the tech, I really do - but I think they could do more with it!

    anybody else got any cool ideas about what to do with a dinky little laser projector........?

  33. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I've got a 1080p DLP rear projector with a 50" screen. Why can't I just take off the screen and project the picture onto an even larger wall from further away?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  34. One more company by shas3n · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is one more company that is making these and apparently they did a demo in CES this year.
    See here http://www.lightblueoptics.com/ They have a nice set of 'artists impression' of their applications !

  35. Re:Cool. What about tv? by barefoothannibal · · Score: 1

    "Micro-Projectors May Bring YouTube On-The-Go"
    Like an iPhone?... Oh... Like an iPhone you can't see unless you are in total darkness.

  36. Comming soon to a bus near you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope."

  37. Incompetent or Evil by GNUPublicLicense · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Indeed, youtube uses exclusively a flash player... which is *bad* since it's not GPL. It's obvious that they are quite incompetent at youtube because they are not even able to code a fall back on a proper HTML element. That would allow standard video web browser plugins to handle the stream (most support flv codecs and format). Incompetence is the only reason I can think of, because I'm not able to picture google brut forcing flash on purpose. I don't think google being able to be that nasty... really.

  38. The real effect by edraven · · Score: 1

    I've been watching this develop and waiting for these to become commercially available for a few years now. Not because I want one, I don't. I want salespeople to buy them in droves, because it will shift the focus (heh) of more traditional digital projectors towards the home theatre market. I don't care if you can fit the projector in a briefcase. I want a good picture from a quiet projector at a reasonable price. If it's the size of a refrigerator, but it costs $50 and the bulbs are $10..? sold.

  39. Re:Cool. What about tv? by clonan · · Score: 1

    focus.....

  40. That's some mountain! by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Damn it Scotty, I need 6000 lumens on the side of this mountain playing Moulin Rouge.


    As if Kirk doesn't get his own way often enough, with mountains that play Moulin Rouge!

    Seriously though... I thing projectors on phones is a great idea. And yes, it'll draw power, but phones have been drawing ever-increasing power for a while now. They're (eventually) destined to be the next PC, remembering that the P is for "Personal", and that "Desktop" is what most of us now call our main workstation machine.

    And for a little more future prediction... who's betting one of the most common lighttones will be "Help me Obi Wan --- you're my only hope!"?
  41. That's easy. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    How many mini projectors will have to "be comming soon" to get the editors to stop posting these stories?

    As many as are hyped until one of them actually comes to market at an affordable price.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  42. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I've got a 1080p DLP rear projector with a 50" screen. Why can't I just take off the screen and project the picture onto an even larger wall from further away?

    Maybe you can, but there may be issues as well. It might be designed only to focus within a few inches of the existing screen, because it wasn't expected that a person would try that, it's just easier to make. You would probably void your warranty. You probably can't set it to ceiling mount mode and hang it from the ceiling.

  43. they stole my idea.. by josepha48 · · Score: 1
    .. I should have patented this when I thought of it.. of course it is so obvious.. rather than have a large screen on a device, put a small projector in it and then you can have as large as screen as you can a surface..

    Imagine taking a nokia N810 and adding a projector in it. Add a usb hub for a little larger keyboard and a mouse and you can have an ultra portable desktop anywhere. Just add white surface.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  44. Re:Cool. What about tv? by ah.clem · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm trying...

    --
    "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
  45. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Why can't I just take off the screen

    Because you were at the back of the queue for opposable thumbs? How the hell should we know what your handicap is?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  46. Retinal Projection by Strange+Quark+Star · · Score: 1

    Another use of this tech could be direct projection of the image on one's retina.
    You can adjust the power output to arbitrarily low levels to not boil your eyes away. Also this thing does not require focusing, thus allowing projection to screens of arbitrary sizes while maintaining resolution. You could for instance get a 50'' image from 1m away, as well as 5'' from 7m, giving you almost total freedom of choice for placing the unit.
    So with pupil tracking it should be possible to put one on the desk before you to replace your computer monitor, TV, whatever. No need for those bulky VR goggles!

    --
    There is no sig.
  47. Canceled by edict of Dept of Homeland Security by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    What happened to typical slashdot April Fool's Day?

    The Department of Homeland Security realized that April Fools jokes make it possible for terrorists to stage attacks and have the response delayed and disrupted by people who think the reports are pranks. So April Fools pranks are now considered to be acts of terrorism.

    The historic worst offenders are already at Gitmo (due to a preemptive strike). Teams are rounding up additional pranksters as they commit their terrorim and cleaning out their postings from forums such as Slashdot.

    If you've already pulled something today and haven't met them yet, it was either too small to be worth their immediate attention or they haven't found out and traced you down yet.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  48. Re:Small enough to embed descreetly in a small dro by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    A projector for a flat surface in that size is easy. The high-tech is creating the 3-D screen in midair and only illuminating the selected parts.

    (Holograms won't do it: You can only see the floating image if the hologram, a mirror giving you an image of the hologram, or a diffuser that is already encoded into the hologram, is in the line-of-sight to every pixel.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  49. Maybe they used 'Gmail Custom Time'. by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    Another great product from Google. ;)

  50. RTFA by nguy · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA, you'll find that they use "dark lighting". Obviously, that's just like regular lighting, except that it makes anything it shines on dark instead of bright. That's the scientific breakthrough that allows them to pack a 60" projector into a box the size of a pack of cards and power it with a single AAA battery. Dark lighting, I tell you, it's the future.

  51. I'll take the glasses. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I'll take the glasses that let me see computer annotations on the world around me, while leaving everybody else unaware of them.

    I don't recall the name of the company. But they're being made in Israel. For a couple years the FAA has working with prototypes for air traffic ground controllers - so they can look out of the tower at the planes and see the annotations - and images of the planes and runways themselves in a solid fog.

    The lens has near-planes (slightly curved) of refractive-index discontinuities and works by multiple total-internal-reflection until the light hits the desired discontinuity and is deflected. The projectors are in a thickening in the frame at each side.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  52. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you also forgot to mention they have existed for several years now. you can buy one now at http://salestores.com/mitsub44.html

    They generally suck as sales people treat them like they are durable and they are in fact not in any way. they break easily. When i left Comcast the back room had 6 pocket projectors that were dead as hell from sales guys damaging them.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  53. Oh no.... by j1r3 · · Score: 0

    Tired of those obnoxious ring tones ? Now you can annoy all the senses of your peers with your new shiny projectors. Thank you technology for bringing annoyances to new levels.

  54. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    So shouldn't I be able to get a lens or two to compensate? It seems cheaper than buying a second TV for the bigger projection (and the extra storage for the redundancy).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  55. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    My thumb in your eye socket, jackass.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  56. Re:Cool. What about tv? by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

    you also forgot to mention they have existed for several years now. you can buy one now at http://salestores.com/mitsub44.html

    They generally suck as sales people treat them like they are durable and they are in fact not in any way. they break easily


    Those are just smaller versions of old technology. The new ones being developed use lasers or LEDs as the light source. The laser projector being demonstrated by Microvision is amazing. Infinite focus, small enough to fit into a normal sized cell phone. It uses a tiny scanning mirror to display the image rather than a lens. Should be very durable.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  57. Re:Small enough to embed descreetly in a small dro by AJWM · · Score: 1

    The high-tech is creating the 3-D screen in midair and only illuminating the selected parts.

    That's where the smoke comes in, as in "it's all done with smoke and mirrors". Although water fog from one of those small ultrasonic foggers is used instead of smoke. For a better image, the water is doped with fluorescent dyes that need activation by two separate UV frequencies to light up; use two projectors and you can light up the voxels (3D pixels) at specific locations in the fog.

    --
    -- Alastair
  58. Battery life? Flicker? by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the company site. No mention of battery life issues.

    This thing is a one-pixel display being scanned in 2D by a MEMS mirror. One pixel scanned displays have been tried before, and they're usually annoying. One of the neat things about LCD displays, plasma panels, and TI DLP mirror systems is that there's no flicker at all, because the display has full persistence. This brings back flicker, big time; all the persistence is in the eye. This idea has been tried before, in bigger displays, and abandoned. So this isn't going to look great, but it will have niche uses.

    Brightness is 10 lumens, incidentally.

    1. Re:Battery life? Flicker? by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      Here's the company site. No mention of battery life issues.

      The first Microvision protoype is roughly the size of an ipod. Most of that space is battery. The company claims about 1.5 hours use, but claims future iterations will be up to 40% more efficient.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  59. Zardoz!!!!! by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    so where is my damned "Zardoz" ring?

  60. More power needed Scotty by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    And this is exactly the kind of device that needs 10x more battery life than our best batteries, and 10x more efficient light output for bulbs.

    Roll on radioactive batteries is what I say.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  61. Re:Cool. What about tv? by clonan · · Score: 1

    You could, but you would also need a mounting system as well as an enclosure to keep dust of of it...Plus since it already has a fairly fixed focus on the existing screen you may need to remove that set up and finally, well ground kenses of any size can be extremly expensive.

    If only there were a small projector device that probably would cost about the same as creating a focusing box from scratch...something that cost say about $300?

  62. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I don't think a $300 mobile (or stationary) projector is going to do 1080p anytime soon. Certainly not one as nice as my 50" DLP.

    I wonder how long it will take before "dual mode" TVs are available. I don't want to watch a 200" screen all the time, especially if it needs a darkened room.

    Maybe some kind of fiberoptic bundle that can plug into the enclosed rear projector, maybe with extra lumens for the bigger projection, but sharing all the other equipment. A fiber bundle could even point at an arbitrary wall without moving the enclosed set.

    I'd love to see a homebrew version that just sticks a fiber bundle "pickup" in the path inside the enclosure, and points it at a wall through a lens box at the outside end. But I'm not ready to sacrifice my set for the experiments :).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  63. Wow! This is going to be great... by cashman73 · · Score: 0

    ... to connect to my PC to play Duke Nukem 3D! Which do you think will come out first? The projector, or Duke? ;-)

  64. Annoyance Tool by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    As if it weren't annoying enough to go to a theater and have people shine their laser pointers on the screen, now they'll be sitting down front and showing You Tube, p0rn, their MySpace or other crap during the movie to annoy us.

    Likewise cell phones, MP3 players and personal video players seem to be rampantly used in public by jerks who wish to annoy others with their conversation, music or video. Now we'll get to put up with projections. Of course, when you ask them to stop due to decency or courtesy, they'll start shouting about it being a free country and they have the right to show their crap wherever they want.

    At least one part of the article was prophetic: we'll definitely start seeing "No projectors allowed" in public places. Nice idea for business; new annoyance tool for consumers.

    1. Re:Annoyance Tool by CompMD · · Score: 1

      I, for one, will be proposing an ordinance at my next city commission meeting that would authorize the concealed carry of a hammer or mallet for the purpose of bludgeoning, smashing, or otherwise destroying these devices when used as a nuisance in public places. Ownership of the projector in this city will provide implicit acceptance of this ordinance, and should the projector owner resist your attempts to smash his projector, you will be permitted to smash the owner of the projector. Problem solved. :)

  65. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *waves hand* this is not the projection device you are looking for

  66. Re:Cool. What about tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My thumb in your eye socket, jackass.

    That would require opposable thumbs. Got anything else?

  67. Re:Cool. What about tv? by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    That one is by Microvision and uses raster-scanning Lasers. It's a different technology and there have been reports of nasty artefacts due to laser speckle, but we'll have to wait and see. There's another company called Light Blue Optics who are also working on a small projector for mobile phones. Theirs is a different technology too and rather than raster-scanning, it bounces lasers off a Fourier transform of the desired image. Somehow it all comes together to form the actual image you want. One advantage of this is that if there is a fault with an individual pixel, the "badness" is imperceptibly spread over the whole image rather than showing up really obviously.

    I still prefer the idea of video goggles though. It makes much more sense if you want a mobile "big screen". The Indicube is a portable video player using video goggles and will be released soon. The screen will have an FOV equivalent to something like a 17 inch monitor on your desk with a 800x600 resolution.

  68. The Cure by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If someone starts annoying me on a bus or plane with small projected images distracting me, I see no reason why I should not then start demonstration of the awesome art of shadow puppetry until they desist.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  69. Interlaced by DrYak · · Score: 1

    VHS is actually double that resolution (320 across x 486 scanlines).
    ...interlaced.

    Which basically means that it's still actually 320x240 as the parent said (like a regular non-HD CRT TV).
    But the VCR is quickly alternating between odd and even lines go give the illusion of a higher resolution.
    (2 times per frame. So the VCR sends 60 fields per second for 30 fps US/JP NTSC shows, and 50 fields per second for 25 fps EU PAL/SECAM shows - although at a slightly higher resolution).

    If you display the video on a non-interlaced (progressive) display like a computer screen, you get interlace artefacts (combing : when object moves, because the two fields that compose the image weren't recorded at the same time, alterneting odd and even lines show different position), unless the initial source from which the video was made wasn't interlaced (basically : 25fps PAL video tapes made from 24fps cinema movies).
    (and that's ignoring the even more artefacts your get because VCRs encode the colors at a lower resolution than the picture, the same kind of concept like modern digital MPEG compression)

    But anyway, the casual user of such kind of projector will very probably be watching youtube video or other video bytes designed for handheld screens, and in those situation, given the compression quality, even a 320x240 projector might be overkill.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Interlaced by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      This feels kinda like nitpicking, but incorrect is incorrect. VHS is not 320x240 per frame. It is (approximately) 320x480 per frame and 30 frames per second for NTSC.

      If you display VHS on a 320x240 screen, then you are only seeing half the image (field 1 is shown; field 2 is thrown away). So VHS is double QVGA resolution, because it has the same number of frames per second (30) but twice as many scanlines (480 versus 240).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  70. Image quality will probably be horrible... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    I mean, just look at the prices - $350 for first-gen technology of a micro projector? If it was any good they'd be pitching it at businesses for $2500 a pop.

    --
    No sig today...
  71. Re:Cool. What about tv? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    VHS is analog in the horizontal, so that "320" is sort of meaningless.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  72. Re:Cool. What about tv? by aliquis · · Score: 1

    ... and interlaced?

  73. Re:Cool. What about tv? by aliquis · · Score: 1

    he didn't saw it ;D

  74. Re:Cool. What about tv? by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    Not really meaningless, just variable. VHS varies in quality depending upon the speed used. Generally speaking:

    SP == 335 distinct black-and-white dots from left-to-right
    EP/SLP == 305

    The quality of the signal affects the resolution, so that it is not fixed like digital. If you go to a more advanced standard like Laserdisc or Super VHS, then you would see 560 distinct B&W dots. And finally DVD, when viewed through analog S-video, would be about 640 viewable resolution... the maximum that NTSC can handle. ----- Some analog standards like Enhanced Definition Betamax CLAIM they can do "over 670" horizontal resolution but I don't really believe that figure (especially since it's coming from Sony).

    Chroma resolution:

    The color resolution on analog really sucks. On a DVD you get about 350 pixels across for the chroma resolution, but on VHS it's only 40 across. Pretty poor and the reason why third or fourth generation copies suffer from severe chroma blur.

    So in summary:

    VHS is *approximately* 320 horizontal x 486 visible resolution with 60 interlaced fields @ 30 frames per second.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.