The Original mcom.com Revived

saccade.com writes "For those of you that missed the emergence of the the World Wide Web the first time around, Mozilla co-founder JWZ has recreated it for you. In honor of Mozilla's tenth anniversary, he's recreated the original home.mcom.com sites in all their 1994 glory. He even has vintage browsers to go with them."

Comments

Re:Rickrolled?

[Brian Gordon]

You're 10 years ahead, trolling 10 years ago was punching monkeys..

Ahh, the days..

[Hyppy]

Ahh, the days when changing your browser's "background" color to anything other than (off-)white meant most pages became unreadable.

Oh, and good job, Slashdotters. The page is down already!

Re:Ahh, the days..

[dougmc]

Oh, and good job, Slashdotters. The page is down already! I got the impression that that was part of the `early web experience'.

(Seriously, it looks like the web server is patched to feed data as if you were on a slow dialup ...)

Re:Ahh, the days..

[Hawthorne01]

Oh, and good job, Slashdotters. The page is down already!

Naah, they're just re-creating the experience of websurfing on a 14.4 modem.

Re:Ahh, the days..

[Brian Gordon]

They're certainly written to be like 1994.. WORST. HTML. EVER.

Re:Ahh, the days..

[electrictroy]

I like to look at the old webpages for psu.edu and scifi.com.

Ahh simpler times. Plain text with just two or three images (resembling a newspaper). Not like today's pages that seem to take forever to load because they are so overburdened with a lot of junk.

Re:Ahh, the days..

[twistedsymphony]

Oh, and good job, Slashdotters. The page is down already!

That's unpossible, slashdot readers never click to read the article.

Re:Ahh, the days..

[electrictroy]

In 1994 you probably though 28.8kbit was fast.

In 1995 I was surfing the net with a 2.4 k modem. I had to select "don't load images" but it was still possible to visit my favorite sites like scifi.com even at that slow speed. If I would have had your Sporster modem (~20 times faster) I probably would have been in heaven! :-)

Today I still use a 56k modem while traveling. With image compression the 56k is almost as fast as my 700k DSL w/o compression.

HYPE tag.

[thesolo]

One of Jamie's trivia questions is the origin of the HYPE tag. I remember the tag well, it was an easter egg that played a sound when it was used (only in certain versions of Mosaic/Netscape), however, I haven't a clue as to when or why it was implemented.

Does anyone know? Google reveals nothing on the subject.

Re:HYPE tag.

[Indefinite, Ephemera]

For what it's worth, http://cyberborean.wordpress.com/2006/03/29/the-ancient-tags-museum/ suggests that it was 'for great fun of developers'.

Re:HYPE tag.

[Just Some Guy]

It was removed later 'for great justice'.

Re:HYPE tag.

[montulli]

I guess it's a little unfair that I answer this question, since I was there when it was created.

The tag played a sound clip of Marca saying "What is Global Hypermedia?"

I'll stay mum about the why. :)

Bandwidth

[Kelson]

The best part is the bandwidth throttling, back to 1994 dial-up speeds. I was looking at this yesterday, and it was weird to watch the interlaced GIFs load line by line. (Remember how Netscape used to have a LOWSRC attribute for images, so you could specify a low-res version that could be loaded quickly and displayed while it tried to download the massive, whopping 50K full image?)

A flashback to the way I first encountered the web.

Of course, it's probably even slower today, now that it's linked here.

That's not bandwidth throttling

[Just Some Guy]

Unfortunately, it seems to be running on Netsite.

Re:That's not bandwidth throttling

[markjl]

:) Netsite evolved into the Netscape Enterprise Server and I was there at Netscape when the web site cluster served over 100 million hits per day in 1996. Those were amazing times, many server manufacturers would bring in hardware and we would benchmark a portion of www.netscape.com's traffic on them, which usually led to discussions about how to tune or optimize the OS or the IP stack, I know we helped SGI at the time.

The server and software engineering folks helped develop a dynamic DNS server that would help globally load balance web traffic based upon the inquiring IP address. They also helped hack SSL into rsync back in the day, so that is how we securely published web content updates out to the cluster.

Sadly, we also pioneering web advertising at Netscape. My colleague Alan spec'd out the dimensions to the ad banners, in case you wondered where those 460x68 dimensions came from: it allowed a minimal amount of horizontal white space on each side of the web page when the web browser had a vertical scroll bar on a 640x480 laptop display running Navigator, IIRC.

So those ad banners were physically changed on the docroot via a cron script in order to rotate them. The joy of hacks in a funded start up, but it made money! In fact, unlike most corporations today (e.g.: Microsoft), there was a strategic decision *not* to create an advertising server, so we helped create an industry and did not compete in it. Well, didn't complete until TW/AOL acquired Netscape -- but that was the day Netscape really died (it could be argued that bought Netscape solely for our web site traffic and advertising revenue since they didn't know what to do with the browser and server software. Witness the eventual release of the browser software to the mozilla.org project (thanks also to jwz!) and iPlanet/Sun eventually selling the server line to Red Hat, who continues to open source the directory and certificate servers today).

I wrote the plug-in finder, could it have been the most used CGI on the web at the time in 1996 -- who knows? I went on to become a technology evangelist at Netscape.

Good days indeed, thanks for the memories!

When it's not Slashdotted ...

[Daniel Dvorkin]

... the site loads instantly. It's easy to navigate. There's just enough information near the top of each page so you know immediately what the page is for. The text is easily readable with default browser settings, even on a small screen.

Modern web developers could take a lesson from this.

Re:When it's not Slashdotted ...

[Reziac]

mcom, if it exists, seems to be slashdotted, but the livejournal page was quick... I agree, there's just too much sheer JUNK on the average page today. Most modern sites are now so gunked up that they perform on broadband about like the most primitive 1994-era sites did on 14.4 dialup.

One of the major reasons why on every site that still halfway works with it, I still use (are you sitting down?) Netscape v3, is because it strips most of the sheer JUNK, making web speeds tolerable. The same page can take 10x as long to load in Mozilla (not only because Moz is SLOW to render, but also because of all the JUNK).

IMO, NS3 is still the best, most stable, fastest, and most bug-free of all browsers. It's too bad source code is not available (I asked JWZ about that a while back, he said he'd tried to get it and no joy) as if user-optionable modern features were implemented atop this fast, lean old browser, we'd really HAVE something.

Re:Enough of this Acid3 nonsense...

[esocid]

What test would that be? If they can load text and jpegs progressively in less than 4 minutes?

the /. effect, 1994-style

[downix]

Well boys, we sure killed that connection fast.... feels just like the old days!