Slashdot Mirror


Bell Wants to Dump Third-Party ISP's Entirely

phorm writes "Not only is Bell interfering with third-party traffic, but — according to CBC — they want third-party ISP and phone carriers off their network entirely. Bell is lobbying to have lease-conditions on their networks removed, stating that enough competition exists that they should not longer be required to lease infrastructure to third-parties. Perhaps throttling is just the beginning?"

1 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They are a utility by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think, in those early days, it was a wise investment on the part of government. Within a few decades, phones reached just about every house in the US and Canada. The government (really the people) knew that no company could raise the capital required for such a massive infrastructure program, so they popped in the right-of-ways and the like and granted the companies an effective monopoly, but with some rather important understandings.

    What's happened is that the telcos have forgotten that the taxpayer subsidized and continues to subsidize their networks.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.