Slashdot Mirror


pizza.com Sold For $2.6m

f8d noted a beeb bit on the fact that the pizza.com domain name was sold for a ridiculous 2.6m bucks. Can there be a bubble and a recession at the same time, or do the two cancel each other out like Penn & Teller?

20 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. You kidding? by WarlockD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That was a STEAL. Just think of the marketing budget of any of the standard delivery places (Pizza Hut, Papa Johns, etc). This is not even a blip on that radar. I just hope it was a pizza place. God help us all if it was a porn company.

  2. Actually, it really does make sense by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, America is going through a recession because of our debt, combined with our realizing that we have overspent. OTH, Europe, japan, canada, etc are all picking up speed while the dollar continues to plummet due to our federal and trade deficits. Hopefully, the next president will be responsible.

    Second, the net remains one of the best places to lower your costs. Far cheaper than having a building and ppl. 2.6M? That is nothing.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Actually, it really does make sense by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... the housing bubble/bust was the product of a free market, Mmmmmm, no, the Fed made credit too cheap. HARDLY the product of a free market.
      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Actually, it really does make sense by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cheap credit isn't always bad, because it can create economic stimulus. Deceptive loaning practices and idiot purchasers signing off on ridiculous loans they have zero chance of repaying lead to the housing situation.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Actually, it really does make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think so. We are about to see the world shift to using Euros rather than dollars. Basically, the bulk of the west (EU, Canada, Australia, and even Japan) is strong enough to keep things going. America needs to allow the dollar to plummet so that we can bring jobs back from China. You have so many Americans pointing their fingers at Mexico and NAFTA, but the reality is that the jobs have shifted to China because they have their yuan fixed against the dollar. I think that it is going to get tough here, but we have the ability to create new jobs.

      In particular, the next KYOTO will almost certainly have the west creating a carbon tax. I believe that the next pres will be offering tax cuts for electric cars. But even more useful is if it is electrical AND the bulk of the car is made here(i.e. 60% American).

      The hard thing will be that China is going to tie their money to the euro instead of the dollar to try and wreck their economy. But EU has shown the willingness to regulate and tax. My belief is that EU will put on a carbon tax that will serve the same effect of hitting China.

    4. Re:Actually, it really does make sense by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First, America is going through a recession because of our debt, combined with our realizing that we have overspent. OTH, Europe, japan, canada, etc are all picking up speed while the dollar continues to plummet due to our federal and trade deficits. Hopefully, the next president will be responsible.

      Don't worry, the Republicans are certain to make sure we hold the next president responsible.

      --
      This space available.
  3. Re:Enhance Your Sausage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Domain names? Who uses those nowdays? I just enter my QUERY into the address bar and voala! I get a page.

    Search is the big winner not domain names, thats such a money laundering scheme by ICANN and just for suckers.

    If something is GOOD then it travels by word of mouth, just like news.

  4. To a big company it's a few dozen TV adverts... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A major pizza maker will spend more than that on TV advertising every month. It's nothing in the big scheme of things.

    --
    No sig today...
  5. Re:no their can't! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who cant spel don't care that they can't spell. Ridiculing them is a waste of time, first, because they don't care, and second, because they can't tell that you're mis-spelling stuff.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  6. Re:Two Americas by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BEAR STEARNS COS THE (NYSE: BSC)
    Last Trade: 10.47
    52wk Range: 2.84 - 159.36

    The stock is down 93.5% from its high last year. You call that "never ... any real risk"? I call you insane.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  7. You gotta be kidding me by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was discussing this at lunch yesterday with some coworkers, and most of us thought it was an incredible waste of money. How many people do you know that when they want something, they open up their browser and just type what they want plus .com right into the address bar? Only complete fools do that and I'm honestly sure that population subset is very small and made up of old people.

    One guy was defending their position rather well though, he basically said that whenever you do non-internet advertising, such as on television or the radio, having a very simple URL is a necessity for having people remember it for later on.

  8. Re:Two Americas by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bear Stearns is getting bailed out by the government (taxpayers). JP Morgan is getting the money to by BS from the government (taxpayers).

    Sure, the stock is going to be worth less net now than it was last year. But that high was built on a bubble inflated by money lent from the Fed (taxpayers).

    And even more to the point, Bear Stearns (and its shareholders, brokers and execs) raked in so many $BILLIONS over the past 10-20 years (much of which ultimately came from the Fed - taxpayers) running the way that eventually ran out, that it was totally worth the price of doing business when its shares collapsed. They made way more cash money operating that way than they lost on paper.

    So I call you math illiterate, and a liar.

    Meanwhile, the Republicans controlling the economy(ies) that pumped all that money through BS will do anything they can to avoid protecting the millions of people in the same economic straits who are going to lose their homes.

    So I call you a thief, since your lies are protecting the Republican wealth redistribution from most Americans to banks like Bear Stearns, and the even risk-freer ones like JP Morgan.

    Your free market economy at work. Free of honesty, that is.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  9. Re:Awareness by mini+me · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How are you going to get the public aware of the fact that pizza.com even exists?

    Post a story about it on Slashdot?
  10. Why ridiculous? by smackenzie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is 2.6M for one of the most recognized words in the English (and other) languages ridiculous?
    Dominos Pizza Market Cap: $843,000,000
    Papa John's Market Cap: $725,000,000
    Pizza Hut 2007 Sales: $26,000,000

  11. Re:Prices lag recession by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TFA only says the domain was bought by an anonymous buyer which probably means that it wasn't an actual Pizza business that bought it.

    The whois for pizza.com still shows Christopher Clark as the owner.

    I'd guess it's along the lines someone wrote earlier - it was bought by a speculator who has some idea of the true value of the domain name. US$2.6M is nothing compared to what those chains spend in advertising.

  12. Re:Two Americas by jlanthripp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If by "Fed" you mean the Federal Reserve, you are quite mistaken. You really should find out what the Federal Reserve is before you spout off as if you know what you are talking about. A good starting point is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  13. Re:Two Americas by radl33t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you know what your talking about?

    I am suspicious that you do not have the credentials to be making these claims. Both of your posts use adjectives and vague numbers, suggesting to me that this info emanated from the wrong end of your body. Could you provide some concrete evidence? Not that I'm a cheerleader for the US banking system, federal reserve, fed government, plainly corrupt US markets, etc, etc, but you come off a bit delusional.

    Do you think Bear Stearns should have crumbled? Do you want to see a bank run? What do you think happens to poor people then?

  14. Re:Enhance Your Sausage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I have found funny is that I work at a tech company, for the sake of this post let's go with "foobar", and I was over at a sales persons desk when I asked him to go to our homepage. "Just go to foobar.com", I told him. He goes and types "foobar.com" in the search box at the top of the Firefox chrome. "Wait wait wait, what are you doing?", I asked, "Why don't you just type it in the address bar and go straight there?". "What are you talking about, I am typing it in the address bar!", he replies. I grab the keyboard and show him how to type a URL into Firefox. "Oh, I didn't know you could do that with foobar.com", he said.

    Apparently unless some people see something with http://www./ on the front, they have no idea they can stick it in the address bar. Google has become the gateway to the internet, even when you could get there directly..

  15. Re:Enhance Your Sausage! by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate system admins like that who only provide a www dns entry. :(

  16. Re:capitalist tool by dgun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When American liberals say they want freedom of choice, that they really mean is that they want to kill babies. And this explains many of the contradictions of their 'ideology'. Your statement made about as much sense as my paraphrase. This concludes my karma burn for the day. Thank you.

    I'm not a liberal. I don't support roe v. wade. My statement makes perfect sense, and was not flame bait in the least.

    American conservatives claim to want free markets, yet consistently support bail outs like the one in the subject of this thread. They also support various subsidies. Or rather, they pick and choose subsidies to support.

    American conservatives claim to want free markets, yet support a wide array of market tinkering. Therefore, my conclusion that what they actually want is zero tax burden is perfectly sensible.

    There are many, many fundamental inconsistencies with American conservatism. Modern American liberalism suffers from inconsistencies as well. That's not to say that inconsistency in political ideology is always a negative. I'm reminded of this every time a libertarian advocates private ownership of public roads and interstates.

    My observation was not meant as a slander, yet I guess I should have realized that it would have been taken that way. :/

    And, byw, the reason I had ideology in quotes in my first post is that I'm not sure it is a completely legitimate use of the term.

    --
    FAQs are evil.