POD Braces Itself Against Amazon
OMNIpotusCOM writes "As we've previously discussed, Amazon is in the process of taking the 'Buy' buttons off of published on demand (POD) books that were not created by Amazon's in-house publisher, BookSurge. PODdy Mouth has been reporting reactions throughout the week (including an open letter from Amazon), culminating today in letters to Amazon and their board by the Author's Guild, Small Publishers Association of North America, and the Publishers Marketing Association. Possible lawsuits are looming ... is it enough to change Amazon's mind?"
What is up with Amazons latest strategy?
In the past there was always products sold by amazon, and then a link to 'used & new' which I never touched because when I go to amazon, I'm looking specifically to by a NEW item from amazon themselves, and for amazon to take direct responsibility if there are any fuck ups.
Now they are trying really hard to blur the lines between their own products and those of other vendors.
I only noticed this after I bought an item which I had no reason to believe was *not* coming from amazon, when I got an email saying:
Would you like to leave RIP_U_OFF_4_THE_LULZ feedback on your recent purchase?
This is not a good direction, but hey, they practically have a monopoly on cheap online books so what am I gonna do.
I am gonna go way, WAY out on a limb here and say "No".
No major company would willingly piss off this many people and customers without carefully considering how it would affect them (Not if it plans on remaining a major company).
They probably have estimates of how many lawsuits are likely, their probability of success, how many donuts they are gonna eat during the trials...
That said, SHOULD they change their mind? I think that forcing your customers into one path tends to piss them off, especially if your forcing them into a path that is extremely profitable for you (AKA MS Vendor lockin).
It might work in the short run, but it could damage Amazon's brand name.
I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
Also, what about authors who already have POD contracts with other publishers. They are condemned never to appear on amazon searches, which a lot of people use to find books on esoteric subjects thinking they cover most available material.
Amazon are pretty dominant in the on-line book sales market at the moment, but moves like this won't keep them that way. It seems to me that they are creating a big opportunity for one of their rivals to get ahead with the small/independent publishers. If I were an executive at, say, Barnes & Noble or Bookpool, I would be rubbing my hands together with glee, contacting the kinds of industry body mentioned in these blog posts, and talking about new ways to promote these markets more aggressively.
If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
And I hope to free more chapters in the coming week. Amazon may not care about losing my Nmap book, but I hope enough people stand up to Amazon that they really feel the effect!
-Fyodor