Slashdot Mirror


Oil Deposit Could Increase US Reserves 10x

HighWizard notes the upcoming release, on Thursday, of a report by the US Geological Survey on the Bakken Formation. This is an oil field covering 200,000 square miles and underlying parts of North and South Dakota, Montana, and Saskatchewan. A geologist who began surveying the field, before dying in 2000, believed it may hold as much as 1 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Later estimates have ranged to the hundreds of billions of barrels. Such a reserve would go a long way toward securing US energy independence.

13 of 869 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nice by snl2587 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not going to hold my breath.

    I wouldn't. Even with that much oil it still is going to run out someday. If anything we should leave it alone for now to ensure that we don't end up with massive shortages as we transition to alternative fuel sources.

  2. Wow, imagine what this will do for gas prices! by epp_b · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Absolutely nothing!

  3. Oil Dependance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is inaccurate:

    "Such a reserve would go a long way toward securing US energy independence."

    This is correct:

    "Such a reserve would go a long way toward securing US energy dependency on oil."

  4. Re:The real question is *SHOULD* you use it by tacocat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well of course we should use it.

    We're going to need every drop of it to invade all the other oil producing nations so we'll have even more oil. All sarcasm aside, this is a really going to be a set back to the American economy in the long run.

    While we are spending our time and money pulling oil out of the ground we are not going to be making any effort to develop alternatives, while the rest of the world (except China) is actually going to work on developing alternative energies.

    At some point we need to address the question of whether it's more important to lower the price of gas at the pump or take measures to develop more sustainable alternatives while we still have some oil to fall back onto. Alternatives to oil are not limited to the fuel pump, but all applications of oil. And plastic is going to be a hard one to replace.

  5. Re:Exactly by whatnotever · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those of you that think it has any validity, try this 6 step experiment.

    1) Get a drinking straw.
    2) Go to a pool.
    3) Start sucking the water out of the pool as fast as you can with that straw. (You probably should not swallow the water)
    4) Go to the ocean.
    5) Start sucking the water out of the ocean as fast as you can with the same straw. (You definitely should not swallow the water)
    6) Now explain to us all how the amount of water that you sucked through the straw was dictated by reserve you are pulling from. Or try this experiment:

    1) Get a drinking straw.
    2) Get a really big sponge really soaking wet.
    3) Start sucking the water out of the sponge as fast as you can with that straw.
    4) If you start getting less water, try a different spot on the sponge.
    5) Marvel at how thought experiments can prove anything you want if they are divorced enough from the phenomenon of interest, but note that mine is probably closer to the reality of oil extraction than yours is.
  6. Re:The real question is *SHOULD* you use it by Xarin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of people question the wisdom of continuing the oil economy, there just aren't a lot of clear cut answers. There are a lot of possibilities, and a lot of people are working hard to make those possibilities a reality, but at the moment nothing is really ready to take oil's (and for that matter coal's) place in our energy production on a large enough scale. The real issue is that US dollars are no longer backed by gold but by oil. Oil is priced, bought and sold with dollars. This is how the dollar gets its value and one reason other governments must hold dollars as a reserve currency. It also allows the US government to print a lot of dollars without any ill effects as they are taken out of the US economy and held/spent abroad. They then are repatriated by being spent on US Treasury bonds which pays for the dollars being printed backwards. The US is like the ticket booth at a fair. It prints and sell the tickets while the rest of the world spends it on the rides. To eliminate oil is to effectively eliminate the dollar and to eliminate the dollar and replace it with another currency such as the euro is to effectively eliminate US sovereignty as its economic policies will no longer be solely its own. It may also lead the US to abandon its debt obligations to the peril of banks, Social Security, pensions etc. One should not cut off one of the branches that the world economy is sitting on without seriously considering the implications.
  7. Re:We have more oil? by Simon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do you think planning things decades ahead works? Why do you think we'd make better decisions than the ones we did make?

    Ok, so you are saying that we didn't know decades ago that being dependent on oil might be a bad idea and that we should try to get off it?

    --
    Simon
  8. Re:I am not a petrol engineer but I know Chinese by drsmithy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Invest in decent public transport. There should be no _need_ for anyone living within 10-20km of the centre of any reasonably large city (few hundred thousand people and up) to own a car.

  9. Re:We have more oil? by Itchyeyes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just read the numbers. Canada and Mexico account for 35% of our oil imports. Is that a lot, sure it is. But is it anywhere near most of our oil? No. What's more, the GP was making this point to support his idea that events in the Middle East do not affect our oil supply. But the #2 provider of US oil imports is Saudi Arabia at 17%.

  10. Re:We have more oil? by aurispector · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can actually *remember* the lines to fill up . All the arguments about energy policy here are bunk except for one; cost, pure and simple. With oil, you stick a big straw in the ground and suck it out, then boil it to break it down into gas and stuff. Then you put it in your car and burn it. Nothing else is that cheap or simple and has as much energy per gallon.

    The hidden advantage of the current prices is that other technologies become economically viable for development. Besides, there's plenty of OIL right now - current high gas prices are due to a relative lack of refining capacity. I'd bet that when gas hits $5 a gallon in the US, suddenly new refineries will spring up, but also more alternate energy sources will become competitive. THIS IS THE KEY. Once it's really worth it to try out new technologies (a prius does not yet save you money in terms of total cost of ownership), we hit critical mass for research and funding and the market takes care of the rest. Economies of scale will reduce the costs and after a while oil isn't all that profitable, especially when the easily pumped deposits dwindle and it's more expensive to suck it out of the ground.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  11. Re:6000SUX by rubberglove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or just bring your own bag(s).

    I've done this for just about every grocery trip for the past two or three years (except for maybe once a month or two when I actually want a few bags for household garbage cans).

    You don't have to be an ecowarrior to think that the number of bags that we use (and throw away) is ridiculous. Here in Canada it's something like 10 billion a year (!).

    But the 'environmental' aspect of it is only part of it. Frankly, I stopped taking bags from the grocery store mostly just because I was sick of having so many of the damn things that I would never use. But once I started, I realized just how more convenient it is to have a larger sturdy bag (or bags, usually) that I can throw over my shoulder instead of a dozen or so flimsy plastic ones that are uncomfortable to carry.

    Even when I'm doing a larger shopping run with a car (about half the time over the winter) it's still a hell of a lot easier to carry two big blue ikea bags to the kitchen.

    Over these past 3 years I've noticed a huge shift in attitudes about the whole thing. It used to be that I'd have to practically shove the grocery bagboy out of the way and get into a discussion about why I didn't want their bags. Now it seems like at least a third of people bring their own bags, and most stores give a 5 cent discount for it (yay. 5 cents).

  12. Re:Only 10% of oil goes to automotive gasoline? by electrictroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think he has a valid point; and all it takes is a little "back of the envelope" calculations:

    - I burn about 1500 gallons of gasoline per year, which is around 7500 pounds of oil-based product.

    - I use about 250 bags per year, which is perhaps 10 pounds of oil-based product.

    Clearly the majority of my oil usage goes towards gasoline, and the plastic bag impact is negligible... just as the other guy was telling us.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  13. Re:Only 10% of oil goes to automotive gasoline? by Bryansix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Save your bags if it makes you feel good, but it ain't gonna make any real difference.
    Actually the problem with plastic bags is a waste problem and not with how they are made. They are super efficient as carrying devices but then what? The catch a small breeze and now they are a litter problem bound to last for decades. The solution here is to use reusable bags. Also Ralph's (Kroger)has a program where each time you use a reusable bag you get 10 cents off the total of your purchases. I get 20 cents off each purchase because I have two of them. They pay for themselves in no time.