Microsoft Designed UAC to Annoy Users
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "At the 2008 RSA security conference, Microsoft's David Cross was quoted as saying, 'The reason we put UAC into the platform was 'to annoy users. I'm serious.' The logic behind this statement is that it should encourage application vendors to eliminate as many unnecessary privilege escalations as possible by causing users to complain about all the UAC 'Cancel or Allow' prompts. Of course, they probably didn't expect that Microsoft would instead get most of the complaints for training users to ignore meaningless security warnings."
It appears you are trying to make a snide comment.
[Cancel] [Allow]
I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.
It Worked!
It does make sense, when you think about it, since they've found step 2 and patented a frustration detection system.
I have to steal this comment from one of the posts from that story, but...
Step 1: Make frustration and annoying software
Step 2: Patent frustration detection system
Step 3: Profit.
"Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
Microsoft Designed UAC to Annoy Slashdot Users.
There. All better.
Sig this!
Aha! They annoyed me so much that I actually switched to linux. /success
John
Why in hell would anyone want to implement Windows "security" on Unix?