Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia Breeds Unwitting Trust (Says IT Professor)

kingston writes ""As I say to my students 'if you had to have brain surgery would you prefer someone who has been through medical school, trained and researched in the field, or the student next to you who has read Wikipedia'?" So says Deakin University associate professor of information systems, Sharman Lichtenstein, who believes Wikipedia, where anyone can edit a page entry, is fostering a climate of blind trust among people seeking information. Professor Lichtenstein says the reliance by students on Wikipedia for finding information, and acceptance of the practice by teachers and academics, was "crowding out" valuable knowledge and creating a generation unable to source "credible expert" views even if desired. "People are unwittingly trusting the information they find on Wikipedia, yet experience has shown it can be wrong, incomplete, biased, or misleading," she said. "Parents and teachers think it is [okay], but it is a light-weight model of knowledge and people don't know about the underlying model of how it operates.""

12 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Brain still required. by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately, we've yet to perfect the wiki-based model where the reader doesn't have to bring their brain to the party.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Brain still required. by wild_quinine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, we've yet to perfect the wiki-based model where the reader doesn't have to bring their brain to the party. Although Yahoo Answers comes fucking close.
  2. Trust Wikipedia? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Deakin University

    Sharman Lichtenstein

    Uh-huh. Sounds like someone's already defaced the article...

  3. Re:Wikipedia and research papers. by vil3nr0b · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean going to a library and doing actual research is far more reliable than reading people's editable posts on the internet? Stop spreading your propaganda or the internet giants will come for you at night.

  4. No way would I let fellow students operate on me by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read the wikipedia article on neurosurgery and performed the operation myself.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  5. Re:Yahoo answers is worse. by soupforare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Me too!

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  6. Re:Yahoo answers is worse. by wild_quinine · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish I could filter out Yahoo answers from my entire online experience. Just about any question I've ever had for a non technical issue (e.g. Can I feed a hamster strawberries), is answered on Yahoo as : 1. Yep 2. Nope 3. Feed it motor oil 4. lolz, luzer! Yahoo answers has been a real eye opener for me, and like wikipedia, I'm glad it exists, although not for the purpose for which it was intended.

    See, I use Yahoo Answers as a barometer for ignorance. I check it once every so often to see if the human race is still, collectively, an arse-scratching bunch of chimps.

    So far, Yes.

    Last week on yahoo answers:

    Cud I B prgnent?
    Did u do it standing up???

  7. Re:Yahoo answers is worse. by dfedfe · · Score: 4, Funny
    Speaking of Yahoo! answers, this (the last one) is the funniest incorrect answer I've seen so far:

    Question:
    "What is the meaningof "corrolary" in this sentence?
    ------------------
    As a result, oil demand becomes less and less responsive to movements in international crude oil prices. The *corrolary* of this is that prices would fluctuate more than in the past in response to future short-term shifts in demand and supply."

    Answer:
    "Comparable to corollary in a heart, central blood vessel. Could say "heart of the matter" or point.

    The (point) of this is that prices..."

  8. I see people on /. by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... who don't know how to spell "plagiarism."

  9. Re:Wikipedia and research papers. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Funny

    5 years? You'd think those kids would be smart enough to give up after the first few years. Tenacious little guys, aren't they?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  10. Re:Wikipedia hightlights pre-existing human issues by spruce · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't believe you.

  11. Re:Wikipedia and research papers. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're not in CS are you? A lot of places "already" say basically either: have 10 years experience, a masters/doctorate, or find your way out of the building.

    Yeah but after they told me that, I was able to find my way out of the building (only ran into one dead end), so they brought me back in for an interview.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are