Slashdot Mirror


New Spam Site Found Every Three Seconds

Stony Stevenson writes "New figures suggest that 92.3 percent of all email sent globally during the first three months of 2008 was spam. The data from Sophos also indicated that 23,300 new spam-related web pages were created every day during the period, or one about every three seconds. For the first time Turkey's contribution to the global spam problem puts it in the top three offending countries. Compromised computers in Turkey are now responsible for relaying 5.9 percent of the world's junk email, compared to 3.8 percent in the final quarter of 2007."

11 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. A video from the Spam Dept by AsmCoder8088 · · Score: 2, Informative
    In case you are wondering, here is a related video courtesy of Monty Python:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE

    Enjoy!

  2. Sturgeon's Law by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which once again proves Sturgeon's Law which states that 90% of everything is crap. Or 92.3% in this case. Luckily for me gMail is pretty good at filtering the crap, son I only see about 1 spam for every 10 real emails. However, if I look in my junk folder, and compare that to the number of valid emails I receive, I would say that 99% of it is spam.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  3. ASSP is the answer by Lershac · · Score: 4, Informative

    ASSP

    30 minutes to install on an exchange server... filters out all the spam.

    I run it on all my clients, and they average about 95% of all mail intercepted as spam with a zero false positive rate.
    http://assp.sourceforge.net/

    --
    Chuck
  4. Different kinds of numbers by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Informative
    Tnat a country have more or less computers that send spam could be related the amount of new people with internet connection there, specially if there is no big culture around security.

    But the 1st number, the amount new web pages related to spam, needs to be explained a bit more. The original Sophos report at least explain that are the related to the web links included with the mails, but not sure if that implies more spam realted domains, more spam related servers or if the big numbers are more related to different ways to write urls in the same servers,

  5. Re:summary is misleading by seyyah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Phrases such as "Turkey's contribution to spam" are highly misleading. Turkey doesn't actually contribute significantly to spam. How many Turkish language spam messages have you got recently in your mailbox? How many spam messages advertizing a Turkish company's products? None? Then Turkey's contribution to spam is negligible.
    I disagree. There needs to be a means of getting all these Turks to get their computers infected. I can tell you that there are many many web-sites targeting Turkish internet users for all sorts of attacks. Plus, downloading music using clients saturated with spyware is common and I'd be shocked if many of these were not also trojans.

    So, yeah I think Turkey is totally contributing to the spam problem.
  6. While American spam offers girth and inches... by jddj · · Score: 3, Informative

    Turkish Spam KISS YOU! IT KISS YOU!!! It loving sex with all the womens of the world!

  7. Re:I dont get it... by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just because you don't give out your email address doesn't mean someone else can't get it. Website compromises, those idiots who let facebook/myspace/whateverCrapSite log in to their email account to get more address', worm attacks. Hell I got bored and signed my boss up for a whole bunch of porn sites with his home account (he thought he was safe mwahaha).

    Also for some reason I am more likely to get spam on my hotmail/gmail accounts than I am on my work account, and I don't hand those emails out to anybody I don't trust (i.e. only my family has them and they're all secure enough for my liking). Go figure.

    --
    Me failed English...
    FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
  8. Re:Was anyone surprised here? by Weedlekin · · Score: 2, Informative

    "For most people it wouldn't matter, but spammers would get charged massively"

    Except of course for those who use botnets controlled by compromised servers to send spam, which is most of them nowadays.

    --
    I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  9. Re:I dont get it... by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
    IIRC there was someone who tried an experiment some time ago. They tried to buy some of the v1|4|g|r|4 that they'd seen advertised in spam. They couldn't find a single spam which actually led to someone genuinely trying to sell something.

    Try it yourself. I just did, went to my trash folder and opened the first mail. Took me to sale-drug.com, which certainly looks like they have stuff for sale (or at least, they'll take my money). No need to take anyone's word for this, we all have plenty of spam.

    After a few months with most of the spam being stock scams, it's back to good old penis enlargers, generic viagra and cialis. It's all so fucking repulsive and insulting.

  10. Tarpits by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is anyone out there running a tarpit?

    I have the ability to turn my mail server into a tarpit, but it won't do much good unless there are a lot of other tarpits out there too.

  11. Re:Won't sombody think of the children? by oni · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looks like you could use some enlightenment yourself. here's their top 10 list. According to them, the worst spammer is Russian. Number 2 is in the Ukraine. You have to go all the way down to number 10 before you see anyone in the US.