Slashdot Mirror
UK Scientists Make Transistor One Atom Long, 10 Atoms Wide
Bibek Paudel points out a story about the latest step forward in the development of nano-scale circuits. Researchers from the University of Manchester have created some of the smallest transistors ever, measuring only one atom by 10 atoms. The transistors are made out of graphene, which has the potential to replace silicon in the never-ending hunt for smaller computer technology. From NewScientist:
"There are other kinds of prototype transistors in this size range. But they usually need supercooling using liquid gas, says Novoselov. The new graphene devices work at room temperature. Such prototypes are typically made by building one atom at a time, or wiring up individual molecules. Those approaches are complex and impractical, Novoselov says. By contrast, the graphene transistors were made in the same way that silicon devices are, by etching them out of larger pieces of material. 'That's their big advantage,' he says."
One question...
How do you know it's one atom long and ten wide? maybe it's ten atoms long and one wide?
Shouldn't that be 10 Atoms long, One Atom wide?
Summation 2
I submitted this in story form yesterday but also in recent news, Glasgow scientists have made a tiny switch that would make huge leaps in memory storage:
Scientists at the University of Galsgow have claimed a breakthrough that enables them to store 500,000 gigabytes squeezed onto one square inch making way for some hilarious storage for things like cell phones and iPods. The scientists working on it divulged, "We have been able to assemble a functional nanocluster that incorporates two electron donating groups, and position them precisely 0.32 nm apart so that they can form a totally new type of molecular switching device. This is unprecedented and provides a route to produce new a molecule-based switch that can be easily manipulated using an electric field. By taking these nano-scale clusters, just a nanometer in size, and placing them onto a gold or carbon, we can control the switching ability. Not only is this a new type of switchable molecule, but by grafting the molecule on to metal (gold) or carbon means that we can potentially bridge the gap between traditional semiconductor devices and components for nanoscale plastic electronics. The key advantage of the molecule sized switch is information / transistor density in traditional semi-conductors. Molecule sized switches would lead to increasing data storage to say 4 Petabits per square inch. This breakthrough shows conceptually that this is possible (showing the bulk effect) but we are yet to solve the fabrication and addressing problems. The fact these switches work on carbon means that they could be embedded in plastic chips so silicon is not needed and the system becomes much more flexible both physically and technologically. Since these switches are little balls of metal oxide they are made of similar stuff to normal semi-conductors but are much easier to manipulate as discrete molecular units." You can read more about it in Nature's Nanotechnology publication. In related news, researchers have claimed to harness terahertz radiation using circuits.
Another advancement in nanotechnology, thought I would post it here since it's probably not going to be used.
My work here is dung.
Seriously, sometimes I feel the line between science and magic gets fuzzy. A transistor one atom by 10 atoms? That's on such a small scale that is so hard to comprehend that it'd almost be easier to hand-wave it and just say "it's magic."
Pah! I discovered Miniaturization two years ago in Civilization II.
So... is a liquid gas anything like a solid liquid? Or perhaps a case of flatulence gone wrong?
In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.
Since the material in question is graphene, I'm going to take a wild guess and say... carbon.
Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
Of course, this being the UK, we'll give the technology away or sell the company that owns it to an overseas one for 50p.
I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
This technology (and other similar developments using graphene/carbon) seems very promising. And I'm glad they could solve one part of the fabrication process using steps that are already in use (etching).
However, there remains another issue when using these devices to construct circuits: patterning. Right now, that's generally done with lithography, and though several ideas are being worked on, we simply cannot yet use lithography to pattern devices anywhere near this small.
Don't get me wrong: it's good that such technology is out there waiting for us once the patterning tech catches up. But until that happens, this stuff will likely remain in the lab.
Kythe
At this scale, the transistor could very easily be destroyed by a cosmic ray. Interesting experiment, but I have a hard time believing that this development can find many practical applications.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
Uh, no, the challenges to a *feasible* electric car are mostly technological. And no, boil-the-ocean schemes along the lines of "if only the government will mandate electric refill stations along the freeway" are not a political barrier, except in the minds of some activists. Any solution that requires massive up-front investments is a poor engineering solution.
The real problem with an electric car is that *storing* electricity is a hard problem. And unless your electric car runs on rails, you will need to store electricity.
Incidentally, cars aren't the only ones with this problems -- laptops and mobile phones have exactly the same problem.
Now, recent advances in nanotech will help batteries improve, and we may even see practical capacitor-type storage devices. And when we get to that point, the electric car will be a reality.
Go somewhere random
They're in the UK, so I believe the proper term for them is "boffins".
call me when they make one that's 1x4x9.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
I got an early engineering version to test, but I can't figure out how to solder the damn thing to a PCB...
I suppose it all depends on what your definition of "feasible" is. How far do you drive in a single day? Depending on who you talk to, the average American commutes to and from work for an average distance of about 35 miles. An electric car with a 100 mile range between charges is far from infeasible. In fact, it was done but the project was scrapped under somewhat suspicious circumstances.
Something that gets you to and from the store and wherever you work is my definition of practical, and that level of performance is clearly attainable for what some studies suggest are the average usage conditions in this country. So what's the problem here?
=Smidge=
well, for the cases where performance matters (games, 3D rendering, CAD, simulation, etc), all it would take in that case is for one company to spend the extra money, and they will reap the benefits in better sales. Then the others would have no choice but to follow suit. Hopefully those type of companies actually do put some thought into performance of their code anyway.
Having said that, I do agree that it's good to try and keep the purpose of code as clear as possible through sensible variable names and constructs, and a good compiler should be capable of optimising a lot of code anyway, but it's no excuse for just being lazy and using more resources than you actually need..
which is totally what she said
Aye, I wasn't sure if it was just a typo or misheard phrase :p
I'm guessing the mobs will only turn to green energy when the government legalises marijuana and electric VW camper vans.
which is totally what she said
DC Transformers can't exist because transformers rely on the principle of electromagnetic induction, which requires a constantly changing magnetic field, which is a property DC does not exhibit by virtue of being constant.
Step-up DC transformers would require an inverter (to convert to AC), followed by an AC transformer, followed a full-wave rectifier (to convert back to DC). Want to calculate the minimum efficiency lost on each step? Yeah, me neither.
Life would be easier if I had the source code.
And I can't think of a single application where a CMOS transistor is required, where a vacuum tube wouldn't do the trick.
Life would be easier if I had the source code.
Note - I am not a car fanatic. I like cars that take me from A to B reliably, and with decent handling. The problem is, I bought a car so that I'd not have to worry about the distance between A and B.
For work, I drive about 20 minutes - less than 20 miles. But the thing is, I'd like to use the same car for longer drives. The notion of having a commute-only car and a separate car for everything else is not very appealing to me. As for the EV1, I'd love to see a ROI analysis of the costs of putting up the fuel infrastructure for a car that only urban and suburban Americans could use 4 days a week (because they could be driving out/in on Fridays/Mondays).
That said, you should look at the Tesla -- it's supposed to do 220 miles on a single charge. And if they can get their transmission issues sorted out, it's going to make electric cars not just eco-friendly, but *desirable*.
Go somewhere random