Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Quietly Offering Ad-Funded Version of Works

mikesd81 writes "News.com reports Microsoft has finally started offering an ad-funded version of Microsoft Works in some countries. Users who run the software see a small ad as they are writing their document or editing their spreadsheet. Although the program has the ability to update its set of ads online, today it runs mostly ads for Microsoft and a few partners, all of which ship with the product itself. Microsoft remains cagey on the details of where you can find Works SE. The company has been testing Works SE in 5 countries: The United States, France, Canada, Poland and the United Kingdom. It is available only through select computer makers and Microsoft won't say which computer makers those are. However, it seems Sony is offering it in the US."

122 comments

  1. Works? by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It still exists?

    1. Re:Works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Seriously! The last time I saw someone use Works was 1997. Pretty much everyone is just using Office these days.

    2. Re:Works? by arivanov · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wrong question.

      The right one is "It works?"

      Disclaimer: this is not a flamebait. I just spent half a day fighting to convert a document produced with this oxymoron into something that could be read.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Works? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      OOo couldn't read it?

    4. Re:Works? by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a well known PC oxymoron -- "Microsoft Works"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:Works? by ilikepi314 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but amazingly people still use it!

      We had a secretary just a year ago or so that got a new laptop that only came with Works, so she would email out documents as Works files, which no one could open (even Office complains about it!).

      Finally a few of us confronted her, saying we couldn't open her Works files, and we tried to get her OpenOffice to make it easier.

      Her response was "Well, Works came with the computer, it's good enough and I don't want to go messing with it." As far as I know, she still uses it. UGH! At least she isn't secretary anymore.

    6. Re:Works? by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pfft, have you ever tried opening a complex Office or Word document in OO.o? As awesome a product as it is, it's downright lousy for handling things like image filters and pixel-perfect positioning on Word documents. It tries, yes, and sometimes it does OK, but it's far from perfect.

    7. Re:Works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her response was "Well, Works came with the computer, it's good enough and I don't want to go messing with it." As far as I know, she still uses it. UGH! At least she isn't secretary anymore.
      So she's your boss, now?
    8. Re:Works? by xOneca · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Works I would say Microsoft doesn't work a lot. M$ does a lot of copy/paste, but that isn't "to work".
    9. Re:Works? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      It's up to version 9, even.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    10. Re:Works? by Plutonite · · Score: 4, Funny
      Speaking of oxymorons and innuendo and such: did anyone notice the rackspace ads running on the top bar here on slashdot?

      ..its going that extra mile, reaching a little deeper

      If you need a partner, it's Rackspace! No comment.
    11. Re:Works? by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pfft, have you ever tried opening a complex Office or Word document in Microsoft Office? As awesome a product as it is, it's downright lousy for handling things like image filters and pixel-perfect positioning on Word documents. It tries, yes, and sometimes it does OK, but it's far from perfect. That's because Word actually lays out the page according to the printer driver that happens to be default on that particular PC today. So Word is, quite literally, not compatible with the same version of itself on the same operating system.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    12. Re:Works? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      You think that's odd? I've seen ads for Microsoft products on Slashdot.

    13. Re:Works? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      A valid counter-response: WildTanget used to come preinstalled on a lot of PCs as well. Is that also good enough to "[not] want to go messing with it"?

    14. Re:Works? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      So, how to get full consistency... LaTeX editors, maybe?

    15. Re:Works? by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      ODF does in fact aim to get format consistent between different ODF implementations - so if your document uses ODF that works in both OOo and KWord (which are completely independent implementations), your document should be identical between the two, and if it isn't there's a bug in one or both.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    16. Re:Works? by tftp · · Score: 1
      Her response was "Well, Works came with the computer, it's good enough and I don't want to go messing with it." As far as I know, she still uses it. UGH! At least she isn't secretary anymore.

      Indeed, I can't imagine any sane manager who would listen to IT opinions from his secretary. "Either you use what I tell you to use, or you are free to go and work for someone else. It's not just the matter of me being evil, it's mostly the fact that I can't read what you write. Makes you kind of useless here, eh?

    17. Re:Works? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Nope. In fact none of the Microsoft Office apps can open it without a special converter which is buggy and fails on a lot of the formatting.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    18. Re:Works? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "It still exists?"

      It exists to sell Office, kind of like herpes sells acyclovir...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    19. Re:Works? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Works is given away with new PCs all the time, and is worth the absolutely nothing people pay for it. If you want an economical alternative to Microsoft Office, just download Open Office. Works has no reason to exist.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    20. Re:Works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. OpenOffice is broken too, because I just spent a bunch of time trying to convert an OO doc to MS Works. Pfft.

    21. Re:Works? by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      I have dealt with a lot of companies and, over time I have seen lot's of managers taking all sorts of advice from the secretaries, regardless of the secretaries level of business expertise, the level of the secretaries control over the business often related to their skills in other more private areas of human social interaction.

      I have to say I am really looking forward to seeing someone running ad supported M$ (doesn't)Work, instead of free openofficer.org, and yes, quite cruelly, I will laugh at them and mock them and refuse to provide free support ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    22. Re:Works? by ais523 · · Score: 1

      I've had success before now renaming a Works spreadsheet from .xlr to .xls (just changing the extension, the operation that people are supposed to do because they don't understand how file types work) and then opening with OpenOffice; I'm not sure if this is because the two formats are similar enough that OpenOffice can decode both of them the same way or if the .xls just tells it to load some Microsoft-format converters it has, though. It wasn't complex formatting, though (is that even possible in Works?).

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  2. Microsoft Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that like "military intelligence" or "jumbo shrimp".

  3. worst for portability by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MS Works is currently the #1 trouble child for us to do data migration from older systems.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:worst for portability by davolfman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be honest I'd never suggest it with OpenOffice available in this day and age it just makes no sense. The value of Microsoft products in compatibility and when you can get a more compatible product for less money Works has no reason to exist except for widespread ignorance of the existence of OpenOffice.

    2. Re:worst for portability by domatic · · Score: 1

      What's funny about that is that I've used OpenOffice to convert Works documents to Office documents.

    3. Re:worst for portability by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Which in my experience is a royal pain to try to do with Office when everyone who's not a geek loses their disks.

    4. Re:worst for portability by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Actually Works does have a reason to exist - it's easy to use, comes with a bunch of helpful task-centric wizards and is very accessible for computer novices. It might be complete dross compared to MS Office or OpenOffice, buts it's clear it has its place in world.

      My dad used to produce a magazine in MS Publisher and maintain the subscriptions Works spreadsheet. I couldn't persuade him to use anything better. This combo more or less did what he wanted so my extolling that Office (since OO didn't exist at the time) had a relational database, or better table support, or styles etc. just fell on deaf ears. He was in his comfort zone.

      Some people simply can't cope or don't need a full blown word processor or spreadsheet with three times as many menus and buttons. That's why Works exists. There would be nothing to stop OpenOffice producing their own equivalent of course... OO is hardly the most user friendly product - they would win a lot of new users if they implemented a simple mode and a lot of useful hand holding wizards.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a $40 piece of software. I would rather them release an ad-ridden version of Microsoft Office 2003 Pro. THEN it would be worth it to deal with the advertisements.

    "This resume brought to you in part by: Neutrogena. Neutrogena: We don't know what this stuff does, but women keep buying it!"

    1. Re:Seriously? by SirMeliot · · Score: 1

      Does anyone actually pay for it? I've only ever seen it as part of the shovelware you have to remove from a new computer.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      "I would rather them release an ad-ridden version of Microsoft Office 2003 Pro. THEN I'll install the ad-blocker patch that turns up on Teh Internets a few days later"

      FTFY

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:Seriously? by Technician · · Score: 1

      It's a $40 piece of software. I would rather them release an ad-ridden version of Microsoft Office 2003 Pro. THEN it would be worth it to deal with the advertisements.

      It's a $40 piece of software. I would rather them release an ad-ridden version of Microsoft Office 2003 Pro. THEN it would be worth it to some people to deal with the advertisements.

      There, fixed it.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Seriously? by Dash+Hash · · Score: 1

      You pay for it with the computer, just like you pay for Windows with the computer.

      It's a pity we, as consumers, don't have access to a line-item list of everything we get nickel-and-dimed for; it would be truly shocking, I think, if we did.

      --
      Calling a sword by a pretty name is no more than adding perfume to poison.
    5. Re:Seriously? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd love for that to happen just so all the whiners could see how much of their new Dell or HP is subsidized by the shovelware.

      Maybe then, they'd shut up and format their system upon receipt like a good customer should. They might also give independent builders like myself, just a little more respect.

      If I had the option of getting paid to install crapware, I'd offer it to my clients and pass along the savings with a smile, or maybe I'd use it as punishment for the few jackasses that try to haggle me on the cheapest piece of shit system I begrudgingly sell.

      Here's a hint: when you get Windows preinstalled on a big-name computer, the cost of that license is under $40. Microsoft isn't in it for the money, they're in it for market share. With some suppliers, the cost is even lower. Microsoft would rather lose money on Windows, than lose a seat to Linux/Apple, because that "free" OS will generate sales for big ticket items such as Office, Visual Studio and maybe a few games. That's why they fought to get it on the Asus EEE.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  6. Old News by Paiev · · Score: 1, Informative

    See http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=615
    This has been going on for a while. My Sony laptop from December '07 came with this. It should be noted that the ad-funded version is available only to OEMs.

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    Other alternatives don't make MS money. And it may be leaner than OOo. Not that I would touch it with even a virtual machine.

  9. Placement??? by cliffiecee · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet the ad floats RIGHT over the cursor. Gently bobbing around as you type.
    (Don't worry, it'll be mostly transparent, so you can sorta see what your typing.)

    1. Re:Placement??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I thought the new idea was that the ads get embedded in whatever you're working on, and refreshed when you load the file, 10 minutes have passed, and when you print your work..

    2. Re:Placement??? by Paiev · · Score: 0

      The ads are in fact in things like sidebars, clogging up your interface but not your actual document.

  10. Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there anyone else besides me whom Microsoft Office 2007 drives completely bonkers? I have never had the gross misfortune of using such an unfriendly POS of an office suite, in my life. The only reason I did use it, was because I had to include some Powerpoint slides into a .ppt file prepared by my boss - so I HAD TO use the company-wide office suite - MS Office 2007 - even though otherwise we are quite free to use whatever we prefer. So I use OO.o usually and just publish my works in .pdf.

    Anyhow, it was a traumatic experience. "Where the eff is "Save as"? And how do I insert a slide? OK, how do I center-align this text? No, I don't want to insert Wordard or multimedia clips, thank you. Just a slide. And then save the file under a new name."

    For me, the value of an office program, like for example Powerpoint or Impress, is in the speed I can create the presentation (for example) and how good it will look in the end. OO.o Impress is more than adequate in that sense - Powerpoint 2007, well, it failed me. Same with OO.o Write vs Word 2007 - plus the added argument that OO.o creates standstds compliant documents which I will be able to open with a reader of my choice or own creation in 40 years from now. But yeah, the fact that I can create it quickly and without logic-killing brain-damaging consequences is the greatest value.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by InlawBiker · · Score: 2, Informative
      Coming from somebody who uses Office daily, whether I like it or not, I was in agreement with you for a while. Until I got used to the new interface. It is really greatly improved. Sometimes I hunt for a function still but on the whole it's now much more intuitive and easier to get to features without having to scroll through an endless series of drawdowns / pop-outs / more drawdowns.

      Anyway it's about time they did something new with Office. For the longest number of years I was hard-pressed to see any advantage in upgrading between Office 97 - 2003, except for some useful things in Outlook.

    2. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Office 2008 does have a menu bar with things mostly where you would expect them to be (on a mac).

    3. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else see this post as a way to bash Microsoft? slightly off-topic?? BS. Completely off topic, adds nothing to the thread. I bet you're the type that can't find his socks unless they are in the same drawer.. top one.. you know.. the dresser your Mom got you when you were eight..

    4. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat, Fatter, Fattest. How much hardware do you need to type a letter? MS Office Has gotten just to bloated to work well. sluggish overly complex and easily broken by

    5. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by HillBilly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The learning curve from previous versions of MS office to MS office 07 isn't that steep, if after a little while you are still having trouble its probably a sign of mild retardation. Sorry.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    6. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Interesting then, that all three of us are mildly retarded, and yet we are all young researchers. Kinda hard to survive in nanotech research while being retarded.

      Could it be that Microsoft just fscked up? I submit to you as a possibility that Microsoft has just shuffled around the interface in order to justify the publication of a new office suite, when there was nothing to "improve on" anymore.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Anyhow, it was a traumatic experience. "Where the eff is "Save as"? And how do I insert a slide? OK, how do I center-align this text? No, I don't want to insert Wordard or multimedia clips, thank you. Just a slide. And then save the file under a new name." Really? You're joking, right? Maybe I'm special or something because it took me all of 5 minutes to go through all the programs and figure it out.
    8. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Actually, I used Office 2008 for Mac, and the interface is considerably more sane. It's different enough from Office 2007/Windows, that I didn't have any problems finding the various stuff and edit a fairly complex scientific document. The only (big) problem was that once I converted it to .pdf, the formulas looked like ass. Later I was told that it's a known bug and that when it does that, I should close Word and restart it, and do another conversion and then it usually the formulas look OK.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    9. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      So, how do you manage to make charts without the chart wizard? The chart wizard was (and is) the most appealing thing in Excel for me, and consequently its removal was the most frustrating thing that I experienced in the short time I used Office 2007. In the 97-2003 days I could make a chart in about 2 minutes or less thanks to the wizard and some minor post-processing. In 2007 it took me at least 15-20, assuming I didn't just give up and try on another office suite.

    10. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Z34107 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Office 2007 (with the "ribbon") is the biggest thing to happen to the Office suite since Windows 95. Quit whining that they moved the buttons around just that tiny little bit - I found features and said "Oh, wow! I wish that was in other versions of Office, too!" only to realize that it was - I just couldn't find it until now.

      When you start Powerpoint (or any part of Office 2007) for the first time, the little round Office logo in the top left will glow and a pop up will tell you "Here is where the Save As button is!"

      Couldn't find the "new slide" button? When you start PowerPoint, the ribbon will be on the "home" tab. There's a giant button that says "new slide."

      Same thing for center-aligning text. Even with the ribbon, it's the same icon, in the same spot, as every other version of Office since they went to a GUI.

      Save as? Big round button. Center align? Hasn't moved. New slide? Big button labeled "new slide." Hardly "logic-killing" or "brain-damaging." And, you can always have PowerPoint or Office save things as PDFs or JPEGs or bitmaps or what have you, and Microsoft Word has supported RTF at least since Windows 3.11.

      And, if it's what your employer expects you to use, and gives it to you freely, suck it up. The learning curve really isn't that steep.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    11. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whu... wha???

      "Where the eff is "Save as"?

      Click the biggest, most obnoxious button on the screen. You can't possibly miss it.

      After that, look for the iconic image of a piece of removable storage that doesn't exist anymore... just like every other office suite.

      And how do I insert a slide?

      You're kidding right? New Slide.

      OK, how do I center-align this text?

      Hit the button with the lines that look like centered text, just like in OO.o.

      No, I don't want to insert Wordard or multimedia clips, thank you.

      Then don't click that.

      What is this, some kind of joke? I could almost understand some of the Excel stuff... but c'mon.

    12. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My initial reaction was shock and frustration, but it quickly subsided once I got the hang of the Ribbon. Now I like it, and 2007 has brought a few tweaks and improvements to common tasks like charting and sorting, that make me life much easier.

      More importantly, most new users find 2007 very friendly and quick to learn. It's us veterans that are afraid of change. It's far from perfect, but for a dramatic shift in UI design, they got it pretty good for a first iteration. The next version will hopefully address the power-user woes and make it even better for everyone.

      Worst case, if there's something you absolutely hate about the new version, install both 2003 and 2007 on the same machine and switch where needed until you figure out a new workflow.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    13. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by billcopc · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      We bash Microsoft every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Sundays we bash Apple, and Wednesday is OSS-recognition day. Mondays and Fridays we just beat off to SuicideGirls while Zonk posts a bunch of dupes.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    14. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      I found features and said "Oh, wow! I wish that was in other versions of Office, too!" only to realize that it was - I just couldn't find it until now.

      Examples?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    15. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by a.ameri · · Score: 1

      Office 2007's ribbon interface has a very steep learning curve. I completely understand how someone moving from Office 2003/OOo.org can initially get lost in it. It looks overwhelming, and so different to what we are used to.

      Give it some time, however and you'll soon be won over. After a week of using it, there was no way I could go back to previous versions of office. How many times have you looked at a menu item in Office 2003/OOo and not know exactly what it's supposed to do until you click on it? Well, that would never happen with ribbon. The interface is so intuitive, so easy to comprehend.... it's a major advancement in productivity suite UI design in my opinion.

      My main qualm with Office 2007 (and Office for Mac 2008) is that they are not 100% compatible with previous versions of office even in compatibility mode. Even when you try your best not to use any of the newer features that can not be saved using the old formats, the resulting file always has some minor incompatibility when it is opened in Office 2003 (and Office for Mac 2004). I was working with a group on a presentation last week, and we were using these 4 different versions of office, and we had a hard time interchanging the documents...

      --
      -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    16. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comon, somebody pod parent funny. Although, I usually beat off to SuicideGirls while reading /.

    17. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      I never knew about "PivotTables" in Excel until it was the first button under the "insert" tab. Turns out they're kinda the biggest reason to use Excel. (Granted, I don't use it much.

      Ditto for automatically captioning pictures with "Figure x" in Word - I never knew it was there until it popped up in a context menu one day as I was preparing a lab report.

      I also knew Word had some kind of revision control - "That's when you double-click the wrong button and all the text shows up red, right?" - but I didn't know you could do nifty things like accept/reject changes until they had their own buttons under the "review" tab.

      There are a few more things that I forget. But, I don't do much word processing, and never did know much about the features Word has (had) - until they were so helpfully arranged that I might see them. I'm sure other people feel the same way - Heyyyy, didja know they added pivot tables in the new Excel?

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    18. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't take 15 or 20 minutes to make a chart in Excel 2007.

      Highlight your data. As I'm guessing you're aware of, all the different chart types have their own button under the "Insert" tab of the ribbon. Want a bar graph? Highlight your data and click the "Bar" button. You're done! 2 minutes => 1 mouse click.

      Need more nitpicking stuff? It already brought you over to the "design" tab. Pick out colors, choose what kind of legend and axis labeling you need, add error bars... They're all hidden behind one or two mouse clicks.

      I'm curious... Was there something in the chart wizard that you simply can't do now? I hated it because 9 times out of 10 I really didn't care about all the screens it made you answer to, "like minor X and Y axis labels."

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    19. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I don't really mind the ribbon - because I found how to remove it. And in general, the ribbon is _not_ the issue - it's the menu system that is. As I said in another post, I actually found Office 2008 for Mac _usable_! Though it fscked up the formulas due to (apparently a known) bug, otherwise I didn't have major problems with that. But Office 2007/win has a menu that left the three of us scratching our heads and laughing in disbelief.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    20. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Here is MY problem with 07, which was also ONE of my problems with Vista for the two months I ran it (it was also a slow bloated hog, but I digress), anyway here is my problem: What the hell is so hard about having a "classic" mode? I mean, really, with all those programmers would have REALLY have been so hard to put an option to put in into classic mode, say 2000 or XP for Vista and 2000 or 2003 for Office? At least with XP before the Brico Packs and the hacked msstyles came out you could at least switch it to 2K pro with a couple of mouse clicks. Would it really have been so damned difficult to have it revert back to a normal menu?


      It just seems to me IMHO that with both 2K7 and Vista MSFT changed a lot of it just to say they'd done something new. And while there are a lot more folks who say they love the ribbon than the new Vista interface (bread crumbs,WTH? What was wrong with the up button?) there are just as many that were happy with the way things were. Unfortunately in MSFT land you have to upgrade to keep support, at least in the business world. That is why at home I'm happily typing this on my Win2K Pro desktop, which with a 1.1Ghz Celeron and 512Mb of RAM ran better than my 3Ghz gamer rig with 2Gb of RAM under Vista, and if I need to edit a document I have Office 2K with uses about 1/5 the system resources of 2K7 and at least for me is a much easier way to get things done.


      And while I've got nothing against OO.o and often give it to customers on new builds and will try V-3.0 when it comes out, Office 2K is just IMHO a better product ATM. Even with the hidden OSA9 process turned off on this old machine it is just light years faster and more responsive than OO.o 2.X on Windows. Now on the new machines I build for customers it is snappy as well as on my 3Ghz, but for an older office machine like this it really just drags things down. Maybe I'm just getting old, or MSFT programmers are getting lazy, but IMHO Office 2K + Win2K Pro was about the best they've ever put out and have been going downhill ever since. But that is my 02c,YMMV.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Heyyyy, didja know they added pivot tables in the new Excel?

      Pivot tables aren't very new. They've been in spreadheets since the early '90s.

      I never knew about "PivotTables" in Excel until it was the first button under the "insert" tab. Turns out they're kinda the biggest reason to use Excel.

      They're called DataPilots or DataPivots in other spreadsheets (MS was able to trademark "PivotTables", which surprised a lot of people), and generally live under the "Data" menu. I'm a bit surprised it's under the "Insert" menu in Excel - though that might be a good reason why it was hard to find without the ribbon.

      Ditto for automatically captioning pictures with "Figure x" in Word

      Select "Captions" under the context menu in OOo.

      I also knew Word had some kind of revision control

      Under Edit/Changes in OOo.

      These are pretty basic functions, and I've seen them all in things like Quattro Pro and Improv from the early days of Office suites. I find it hard to imagine not knowing they were there until they were "revealed" by a ribbon. Perhaps it's because Excel's menus are particularly illogical that it needs the ribbon to make it explorable.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    22. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by kklein · · Score: 1

      Nah, sorry, the UI is totally different. There's very little difference from Office 2004 to Office 2008. Sit down for awhile with 2007. It's a bleedin' nightmare.

      The only big changes I see in 2008 (which is what I mainly use these days) are the stupid Gallery that you can't get rid of (but can minimize), and the screwed-up way it deals with toolbars (which you can fix--I like the new one for Word, but have Excel running the way it used to). There are still menus, for crying out loud. Whose idea was it at MS to ditch 24 years of menubars???

      All that being said, every time I do some work in Excel 2003 (Windows), I think, "damn, they nailed the UI right here." You can make buttons for virtually anything you use often (but not often enough to have the shortcut--if it exists--memorized), it takes up the whole screen by default, and it has the formula bar prominently displayed. It's just a breeze to use, and really defines the Platonic ideal of spreadsheetiness.

      But that seems to be the MS strategy these days: Take a product that, though not perfect, people like using and that fulfills its functions reliably, and then screw it all up and piss everyone off. It's a pity, too, because when they're not screwing people over and screwing products up, they really can do some good work.

    23. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      More likely, since Office 2007 was made by Microsoft, you're predisposed hate it so you do. If Office 2007 were made by some OSS company, you'd be hailing it as a triumph of the OSS model, and you'd be ridiculing Microsoft for being stuck in the old UI paradigm of Office 2003 and its predcessors. And both you and I know it.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    24. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      We really don't have time to engage in any emotional involvement with our computer software - not the OS, anyway. We need to test our mathematical models, we need our FEA package to do what it has to do (and if you have ever used Comsol Multiphysics you will see what is an unobtrusive interface that does what we need - no stupid ribbons, just your meat-and-potato menu system), and other SW of the kind, which is difficult enough to use because you have to understand the whole background - so we don't want to get into smart new interface concepts. We write scientific papers with whatever will create the best looking .pdf where we insert micrografies, diagrams and formulas. This is what we use our computers for. They are tools and we have no emotional attachment to them. If Windows XP will do, without crashing, the job of supporting the running applications, we are satisfied. If Vista will do that, we are satisfied. If Linux will do that, we are satisfied. We don't care about who the vendor is.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    25. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't take 15 or 20 minutes to make a chart in Excel 2007. OK. I exaggerated. It took me 10 minutes, then I gave up and used Excel 2003.

      Highlight your data. As I'm guessing you're aware of, all the different chart types have their own button under the "Insert" tab of the ribbon. Want a bar graph? Highlight your data and click the "Bar" button. You're done! 2 minutes => 1 mouse click. Ha! It has never been that easy to create a chart for me. For one, Excel has a terrible time telling whether or not the data is "across" or "down." 3/4 of the time I have to tell it to switch from one to the other. The chart wizard let me preview the chart gave me me the option to change this ahead of time, almost as if it knew that it would not be able to detect this for me. Secondly, I would rather Excel ask me stuff about axis labeling, legends, data labels, etc. up front rather than assume that it has enough information and just go ahead and create the chart. It makes the process much smoother for me. The way Excel 2007 does it reminds me of the horrible way Works did charts (at least, the 3.0-4.0 versions). In Works, I really did spend almost 20 minutes of trial and error trying to get the stupid chart to come out right, because post-processing in Works pretty much didn't exist and their chart creation system was cryptic and confusing at best. I suppose I love the chart wizard so much because I came to Excel from this horrible environment that Works created.

      I'm curious... Was there something in the chart wizard that you simply can't do now? I hated it because 9 times out of 10 I really didn't care about all the screens it made you answer to, "like minor X and Y axis labels." Well, that's why there was that button on the dialog box labeled "Finish." If there were no problems you could pick the chart and click the button. The same quick-and-dirty approach that Excel 2007 now mandates can still be done optionally in the earlier versions. If you never used the wizard then that's fine. But I did. I used the hell out of it. That's why I now make my charts in either OpenOffice.org Calc or Excel 2003. I'm not going to re-learn a piece of software that I've grown accustomed to for almost 10 years now just because Microsoft says it's for my own good.

      Interesting side note: I took my mandatory "Microsoft Office 101" college class the semester before Office 2007 was released. Naturally, they taught the 2003 edition. Next semester, my university wiped out almost all of the 2003 editions in their computer labs and strongly encouraged everyone to upgrade their required Office purchases to Office 2007 without offering any justification. I can only imagine how frustrating it was to my technically-illiterate peers to have been taught a semester of Office, only to have the entire course be completely useless almost as soon as it was over.
    26. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I've managed to avoid the mandatory "Microsoft Office 101" classes because of crap like they put you through.

      But, if it helps, there's the "switch rows/columns" button on the design tab. If you think of the actual in-spreadsheet chart as your "preview" it's mostly the same.

      I like it, and like beating people over the head with it. I find it a lot more intuitive - the design/layout/format tabs don't appear if you don't have a chart, and do appear when you do, for example. I personally don't feel the learning curve is that steep, but if 2003 works for you, you shouldn't have to keep learning a new version "just because."

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    27. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      I like it, and like beating people over the head with it. I find it a lot more intuitive - the design/layout/format tabs don't appear if you don't have a chart, and do appear when you do, for example. I personally don't feel the learning curve is that steep, but if 2003 works for you, you shouldn't have to keep learning a new version "just because." Well, during the brief time I used the new 2007 suite, I must admit that at times the Ribbon was easier to use than wading through menus. It was just Microsoft's lack of considering throwing in a "Classic" UI for everyone who could not or did not want to re-learn the interface just to get work done that angered me enough to ditch the software, especially considering that Microsoft was more than happy to put in such "Classic" UIs for Windows XP (and Windows Vista to a lesser extent).

      PS: I just found that a company called Addintools has made this Add-in to re-create the old toolbars and menus, so at least I have a fallback if my employer refuses to let me use OpenOffice.org.
    28. Re:Slightly OT: Microsoft Office 2007 by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It looks like they've even outsourced moderation. It's been a fluke all week.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  11. Related News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a related story, people are still using Microsoft Works.

  12. Awakening From a Haze by LEMONedIScream · · Score: 1

    Oh wow. What exactly is Microsoft Works?

    I can already feel the effects of this raw food diet I've just begun; my mind has already started to feel much clearer!

  13. Oh the questions that arise,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it require/use an internet connection? Are the ads served up in relation to a keyword search? Does it embed ads in output? How long before it is cracked and made to serve up porno ads etc? When are they going to start including technology from this experiment into other MS products?,,,

    The list of questions goes on of possible/probable issues with this. The public needs to be better educated on their options in the software arena as they have already proven time and again that they will accept adware/spyware without much apparent concern to its effects on their privacy, security or computer health.

    1. Re:Oh the questions that arise,,, by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      The list of questions goes on of possible/probable issues with this. No, there is only one question:
      How fast does it uninstall?
    2. Re:Oh the questions that arise,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The list of questions goes on of possible/probable issues with this.
      No, there is only one question:
      How fast does it uninstall?
      The time could be quite excessive particularly if you have to edit the registry etc or remove auto-reinstallers. It would be amusing if it flat refused to be uninstalled because you haven't viewed enough ads yet, which would stop Joe Sixpack from uninstalling it himself generally. If you read the rest of that paragraph perhaps you would thought more along the lines it suggests, "how do we get the public to reject such nonsense to not only not install it themselves but pressure OEMs into not installing such annoyances?"The list of questions goes on of possible/probable issues with this. The public needs to be better educated on their options in the software arena as they have already proven time and again that they will accept adware/spyware without much apparent concern to its effects on their privacy, security or computer health.
    3. Re:Oh the questions that arise,,, by Dash+Hash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it require/use an internet connection? Not only that, but to protect your children from those horrible, horrible online office suites, we use 95% of your bandwidth at all times!

      Are the ads served up in relation to a keyword search? Yes, but don't worry, we've made deals with companies who use bogus adwords to ensure that you never see something you would care about spending money on (unless it is our product!)

      Does it embed ads in output? Of course! This is just to help you get some income from the documents you create, so you can buy the /real/ version of Works (disclaimer: there is a 100.1% tax of all income earned by you immediately upon later viewing of our ads).

      How long before it is cracked and made to serve up porno ads etc? This unreleased product (yeah, yeah, I know) is the most secure product we have to offer! There are only 23,987 known bugs!

      When are they going to start including technology from this experiment into other MS products? Well, if the EU would just LEAVE US ALONE (HINT! HINT! GO AWAY!) WGA and OGA would be giving you a perfect demonstration right now!

      The list of questions goes on of possible/probable issues with this. No issues exist! As we said, this is our greatest offering ever!

      The public needs to be better educated NOW WAIT JUST A GOSH-DARN MINUTE! What is this "education" you are talking about?! How DARE you attempt to make our shee-, er, customers aware of ANYTHING but what we tell them!

      The rest of your post deserves to be ignored! Propaganda! FUD! Slander! Libel! SUE SUE SUE! DON'T MAKE ME PICK UP THAT CHAIR YOU'RE SITTING ON!!!
      --
      Calling a sword by a pretty name is no more than adding perfume to poison.
  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Hi! I'm clippy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You might remember me from informational presentations such as "Hi there, are you writing a letter?" and "Are you sure you want a comma there?" and I'm here to talk to you about a wonderful new kitchen product!

    1. Re:Hi! I'm clippy! by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

      best... ac... post... evar

    2. Re:Hi! I'm clippy! by owlnation · · Score: 1

      so funny. Mod post funny! (AC or not)

    3. Re:Hi! I'm clippy! by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Just typeset it and for get it?

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  16. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone bother with Works? Seriously?

  17. The things you miss out on... by insanechemist · · Score: 1

    when you wipe the hard drive and reinstall the OS right after receiving a new computer.

  18. Oxymoron by malanoche · · Score: 1

    Come on... "Microsoft Works" ? I wouldnt say so...

  19. Other ads too? by Fri13 · · Score: 1

    Nice! I would like to set OpenOffice.org or GNU/Linux ads there, who I need to take contact on Microsoft and how much I would need to pay about that, approximation?

  20. why? by Republican+Gun · · Score: 1

    Why? Open office is much better than works, word, word 2003, word 2007....

    --
    Eviscerate the Proletariat!
  21. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In other news, Open Office is being offered WITHOUT ANY ADS for all platforms :-) And unlike Microsoft Works, it can actually read Microsoft Office documents.
  22. Desperation? by Pecisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seemingly OpenOffice.org makes good inroads in OEMs, so Microsoft have to do something to compete. But ad based Microsoft product is rather stretching. I mean, no offense, but it is very hard and annoying to use Microsoft products _sometimes_. Ads means additional annoyance.

    Anyway, it is interesting step to watch and smells like testing waters before rolling out full ad-based Microsoft Office out.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:Desperation? by Wowsers · · Score: 1

      it is very hard and annoying to use Microsoft products _sometimes_. Ads means additional annoyance. "I see you're trying to write a letter, press this advert to continue so you lose your train of thought."
      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
  23. Since you asked... by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Outlook 2007 has some rather interesting features. Typing in the middle of a paragraph - when the cursor crosses the line wrap the cursor is sometimes moved to a semi-random place in the text. That took a little getting used to. The last editor I used that had that problem -- well, I wrote it myself. :-(

    The "invisible text" in HTML emails bug is still present too. It's a holdover from O97. You would think they would fix that. Some people feel that having some of the text of their emails randomly deleted or rendered invisible somewhat hampers their productivity.

    And, like Microsoft Works, Office2007 cannot be completely uninstalled. If you get the trial version or ad supported version as crudware you're stuck with it forever.

    It's shocking that quality like this became the market standard.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  24. Sounds Interesting but.. by tylerni7 · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know what the ads are based off of? Are they random ads paid for by large companies, or are they based on what you're typing? Also, does this mean you have to be connected to the internet every time you want to write something, or will it download ads onto your computer? I suppose either way there are negative sides to this, but it is free, so for those that haven't heard of Open Office and don't want to shell out $40, this will be a good alternative.

  25. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by dacut · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone want to help fund an ad for OpenOffice on MS Works?

  26. Re:It's okay, Microsoft... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please do not post links to pirated versions of Office 2007 in full view of the community. In future, please direct them to Office 2003 as it's much simpler to use.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  27. Weather it WORKS or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is still a pile of shit.

  28. Microsoft has been trying to strangle Works by melted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... for a looooong time, but someone always screwed up the strangulation by reminding everyone just how much money it brings in. This looks like yet another strangulation attempt.

  29. Ick by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Need i say more?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  30. Of course it does by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It still does more then what 95% of the public needs. Its cheap, and does the job.

    Though i saw the latest version the other day and it looks pretty hokey with all the wizards..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  31. Old news by jrothwell97 · · Score: 2, Informative

    My Packard Bell machine came with ad-supported Works bundled. I bought it on New Year's Eve, so the fact it's taken four months for this to appear on the front page of /. astounds me.
    And yes, it sucks far more than previous versions of Works.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  32. Microsoft Word supports Works by osssmkatz · · Score: 0

    umm.. you are aware word supports it, right?

    http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word/HP011881161033.aspx

    also, sun's converter tool may help.. keep in mind that you can convert anything to pdf and then from pdf to almost anything if you really need to. I read about it.. but did not bookmark it.

    Is it perfect? No. Adequate for most things? Yes.

  33. Works sucks without ads by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Works can't compete against Open Office without ads. I can't believe anyone would be happy to have an ad based version.

    And why would a company want to risk alienating customers with placing ads in a computer they just bought?

    Having said that, the amount of BS pre-built computers have on them anyway and the fact consumers seem to enjoy getting half of the performance out of their machine they should get because of that leads me to believe customers won't care and would enjoy taking it up the back side from MS.

  34. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by Technician · · Score: 1

    In other news, Open Office is being offered WITHOUT ANY ADS for all platforms :-)

    In other news an entire office suite Open Office not only is without advertisements, it opens many more formats, saves in a open standard format, is multi-platform, and free. There, Fixed it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  35. Hi, there! by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Hello, I am calling you to see if you wanted to advertise on our exciting new advertising medium targetted at skinflints who will use crap rather than fork out any money! Hello? Hello?"

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  36. Re:It's okay, Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you wish
    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3771346/Microsoft_Office_2003_-_Lite_(Word__Excel__Powerpoint__Outlook..
    A 70Mbyte archive, isn't OO.o 127Mbyte, I wonder what that means?

  37. Huh? by CSMatt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've heard about converting document formats to PDF, but how do you convert to a document format from PDF?

    1. Re:Huh? by v1 · · Score: 1

      Acrobat Pro lets you edit PDF documents, and from there you can export to a different format.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Huh? by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 1

      Umm... KWord can do that...

      --
      BM3
    3. Re:Huh? by AngryDill · · Score: 1

      It's not perfect, but the open source DTP program Scribus can open/import PDF documents.

      -a.d-

      --


      I'm Erwin Schrodinger and I approve of this message, and I do not approve of this message!
    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard about converting document formats to PDF, but how do you convert to a document format from PDF? With OpenOffice 3.0 (still in Beta but the final release will be available later this year) you can read PDF files besides creating PDF and PDF/A documents.

  38. Re:It's okay, Microsoft... by CSMatt · · Score: 1

    We already have a free version of Office here:
    http://openoffice.org/ Fixed.
  39. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by Dash+Hash · · Score: 1

    Even though the parent has been modded as "Funny" it is actually a pretty decent idea...

    But... There is a minor conundrum with it...
    On the one hand, purchasing ad space on MS Works will be giving money directly to Microsoft.
    On the other hand, it would be a potential loss of money for Microsoft over the long-term, if people start using OO.o as opposed to MS Works (losing out on the advertisement revenue).

    I think I'll have to do a bit of digging to see if doing something like this is actually feasible, and how much it costs...

    --
    Calling a sword by a pretty name is no more than adding perfume to poison.
  40. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by matthewslf · · Score: 1

    I'm in if you can find a way.

    --
    Fear the Penguin
  41. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    I find it unlikely they'd accept your ad.

  42. Works adware NOT eligible for Ms office upgrade by dugndog · · Score: 1

    Not mentioned anywhere is the fact that regular Works is eligible for MS office upgrade BUT adware works is NOT. Which could be a potentially significant cost difference if you need MS office. And yes, our Sony Viao came with the adware version of works, not the regular version.

    1. Re:Works adware NOT eligible for Ms office upgrade by Raineer · · Score: 1

      And yes, our Sony Viao came with the adware version of works, not the regular version.

      Wow... I could certainly seeing wanting to save money yourself but to have a OEM company put in ad-supported software you can't even upgrade....wow

      I guess it is Sony :/
  43. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by MojoStan · · Score: 1

    In other news, Open Office is being offered WITHOUT ANY ADS for all platforms :-) And unlike Microsoft Works, it can actually read Microsoft Office documents. I'm confused. Have you (and the moderators) used Works recently? I haven't (recently), but an easy-to-find "How to" article on Microsoft's support site says Works does read Office documents (Word and Excel, at least).

    From the article "File formats that are supported in Works 9":

    • Works 9 Word Processor
      You can open the following file formats in the Works 9 Word Processor:
      • Works Documents (*.wps)
      • Works Templates (*.wpt)
      • [snip]
      • Word (Asian Versions) 6.0/95 (*.doc, *.dot)
      • Word 2.x for Windows
      • Word 2007 Document (*.docx)
      • Word 2007 Macro-enabled Document (*.docm)
      • Word 6.0/95 for Windows & Macintosh (*.doc)
      • Word 97-2002 (*.doc)
      • Word 97-2003 Document (*.doc)
      • [snip]
      You can save files in the following formats in the Works 9 Word Processor:
      • [snip]
      • Word 2.x for Windows
      • Word 2007 Document (*.docx)
      • Word 6.0/95 (*.doc, *.dot)
      • Word 97-2002 (*.doc)
      • Word 97-2002 & 6.0/95 - RTF (*.doc)
      • Word 97-2003 Document (*.doc)
      • [snip]

      Works 9 Spreadsheet
      You can open the following file formats in the Works 9 Spreadsheet:

      • [snip]
      • Excel 97-2007 (*.xl*)
      • [snip]
      You can save files in the following formats in the Works 9 Spreadsheet:
      • [snip]
      • Excel 2007 Workbook (*.xlsx)
      • Excel 2007 Binary Workbook (*.xlsb)
      • Excel 97-2003 (*.xls)
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  44. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You irritate me. I'm sure that you've contributed very little if anything to the OSS community, yet you're one of the people who feels the need to troll posts like this with "oh but I can get it for free" posts. Microsoft - a commercial organisation - is not going to release open source or free versions of its software unless its got a good (commercial) reason. We all know this, we all use Open Office. Shut up. Feel free to espouse the values of OSS when you're actually helping the model work.

  45. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    Too bad OO.o sucks in general for the market that MS Works targets.

    MS Works on Windows and iWork on Mac target those that don't need the power of MS Office and OO.o, and don't want to deal with the complications of those apps. MS Works and iWork offer task-based templates to get simple tasks done quickly. MSO offers that as well, but to a lesser extent, and OO.o is woefully lacking in that sort of thing.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  46. Re:What about already existing alternatives? by Technician · · Score: 1

    MS Works and iWork offer task-based templates to get simple tasks done quickly. MSO offers that as well, but to a lesser extent, and OO.o is woefully lacking in that sort of thing.
    --


    MS Works is targeting the Wordpad and Notepad group as a step up to MS Word. Unfortunately many documents saved in the old works format have migration issues. People remember this. It's not just a text editor like Notepad and it's not quite a word processor like MS Word. Open Office is lacking in task based templates, but does a much better job opening other documents and saving in popular formats including PDF. Works is fine on a non networked PC. It's limitations quickly show when in a network. I think MS designed it as a teaser to the office suite. In a Monopoly, it works. In a free market, other upgrades are there.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!