Performance Comparison of Current Intel Core 2 CPUs
crazyeyes writes "Intel has way too many Core 2 processor models. No one really knows if it's worth paying $100 more for a Core 2 Quad, instead of a Core 2 Duo. And when tech websites start interjecting codenames like Wolfdale, Kentsfield and Yorkfield, you know the battle is lost. All we want is a simple guide on the REAL WORLD performance differences between the many Intel Core 2 processors. How do they perform in games like Crysis, 3D rendering software, video encoding software, etc.? Fortunately, there is such a guide — just simple comparisons of the relative performance of these CPUs."
Yeah, the lower end 8 series cards are real dogs. I wouldn't bother with any 8 series card under an 8800 GS/GT/GTS/GTX, as you pointed out, the 7 series cards are faster.
Game! - Where the stick is mightier than the sword!
Is the GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB used in the review any good? It could only muster 18 fps on Crysis at only 1280x1024, regardless of CPU. Isn't that game about a year old? Interesting that the most graphics-hungry game would be two years ahead of the hardware (because 18fps doesn't cut it).
Can anyone provide some elucidation for this topic?
jdb2
My friend won a 9800 pro before they even came out (yeah he was THAT GUY at quakecon). He's got it pushing a 1080p hdtv now as part of his media box (though it doesn't support HDCP since it wasn't even invented yet). Those are amazing cards considering the life you were able to wring out of them (5+ years)
moox. for a new generation.