Self-Healing Ceramics for Nuclear Safety
Roland Piquepaille writes "Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) researchers have used supercomputers to simulate how common ceramics could repair themselves after radiation-induced damages. This is an important discovery because 'materials that can resist radiation damage are needed to expand the use of nuclear energy.' These ceramics, which are able to handle high radiation doses, could improve the durability of nuclear power plants. They also might help to solve the problem of nuclear waste storage. But read more for additional references about how this research could improve nuclear safety."
a) They are likely to be cheaper than existing reactors due to a simpler plant layout.
b) Nuclear is profitable many places where it isn't subsidized, in Sweden it is even taxed and still runs at a profit.
c) Solar/Wind are subsidized more than nuclear ( in terms of money per kwh ) in virtually every country that use them to any large extent.
To put it in terms of another poster, if Solar / Wind is so cheaper than nuclear (which is itself competitive with coal ), why isn't your house exclusively powered by them? Why do you wait for the government to do it for you when you could just go out and buy solar cells yourself? Given that both wind turbines and solar cells are heavily subsidized in many countries, and since they are allegedly cheaper than using other energy sources, one would think that it would be the deal of a lifetime , yet at best people use them to supplement their energy supply, and close to nobody actually use them exclusively. Care to tell me why ?
Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?