Slashdot Mirror


Court Finds Part of Copyright Act Unconstitutional

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "A US District Court in the Southern District of California has found the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act to be unconstitutional. That act is what removes the sovereign immunity for infringement that state workers have in their official capacity, something many argued would jeopardize universities with liability for faculty infringement, not to mention other state agencies. In a rather dense legal ruling (PDF), the Court found that the Clarification Act was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the 14th Amendment. For those of you who have absolutely no idea what I just said, I recommend either being glad that a small piece of copyright law may soon bite the dust, or hoping that NYCL will explain this better."

2 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sovereign Immunity is waivable. by Uart · · Score: 0, Troll

    Actually, according to the Constitution, copyrights and patents exist to, "promote the progress of science and useful arts."

    The benefit to the public being that those things are created, not that they pass into the public domain.

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  2. Re:Constitutional Law 101 by doomy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ok ... here goes ...


    The USA is a conglomerate of separate and independent governments. Each state has its own government that co-exists with the federal government. The federal government is a government of limited powers. It has only the powers that the states gave it when those states ratified the Constitution.

    The United States has always been one nation under God with Bush as its spiritual and supreme leader. Anyone who doubts this or counters this notion is henceforth a terrorist.
    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...