Slashdot Mirror


JFK, LAX To Test Millimeter-Wave Scanners

Narrative Fallacy writes "The Transportation Security Administration has announced that it's beginning pilot tests of millimeter wave scanning technology at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) that allow TSA personnel to see concealed weapons and other items that may be hidden beneath clothes. TSA Administrator Kip Hawley says that that the potentially revealing body scans (YouTube) would not be stored and that 90% of passengers subject to secondary screening opt for a millimeter wave scan over a pat-down. The agency added that security officers viewing the scans would do so remotely, where they will not be able to recognize passengers but will be able to trigger an alarm if needed. The agency also said that a blurring algorithm is applied to passengers' faces in scanned images as an additional privacy protection."

6 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Indecent posing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was asked to do a scan at Heathrow, with no option for a patdown instead.

    To do this I had to stand in a certain posture.

    Imagine someone trying to push, with both hands, a wall coming at them from a slight angle above - or, someone doing a Hadouken at a telephone pole.

    At the same time they should have their legs like someone doing a "Kungfu Dancing" imitation, with the condition that they have just crapped themself so making sure they keep those cheeks extra spread.

    Image from front and back.

    1. Re:Indecent posing by Don_dumb · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had this at LHR back in November (coincidentally I was flying to JFK). The option was to stay in line, or be fast tracked to the front, via scanning.
      They described the process as an 'X-ray' which I would have questioned but as I was quite keen to be progressed I simply said "okay".
      The stances certainly weren't easy, especially as you have to remain still, they had 3 different positions as I remember it.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  2. "please take off your clothes" by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given that both this airports insist on you taking laptops out of your bag (how bad a scanner is it?) and shoes off and on my last notable trip through JFK I had to remove all electronic items (2 ipods, PSP, 2 mobile phones, 2 laptops, safe token) an put them through in a series of trays I can just imagine how this will actually work.

    They'll ask you to take your clothes off, put the clothes through the scanner to find anything "invisible" and then send them down a ramp at high speed getting them all mixed up with other people's clothes.

    My current irritation in US airports is the "boarding card" check AFTER the body scanner. So if (like me) you normally put your ticket in your jacket pocket (which of course has to be scanned separately) then you get scolded even though your boarding pass had to be checked to get you into the security queue in the first place. All this check does is slow everyone down for another 10 seconds per person for absolutely ZERO benefit (they don't check that you are the person on the card, just that you have the boarding card).

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  3. Boarding pass check by supersat · · Score: 4, Informative

    The boarding pass check is to see if you should be directed to secondary screening. Yes, it's dumb that they put the secondary screening indicator (the "SSSS" of doom) on your boarding pass, but that's how it works.

  4. Re:Option to opt-out by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

    Airports were the first place where it didn't apply. Now you can be frisked before entering a night club, a political rally, or hell, even your local high school.

    The way the US has let the Fourth Amendment slip over the years is a disgrace.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Re:Option to opt-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Something I saw someplace once...