Slashdot Mirror


Laser Pointers Classed as Weapons in Australia

An anonymous reader was the first to point to an article in the Sydney Morning Herald which says that New South Wales (of which Sydney is the capital) will prohibit the possession of certain types of laser pointers, defining them as weapons, and make it an offense to carry any laser pointer "without a lawful reason." (Similar coverage at news.com.au) Western Australia apparently beat NSW to the punch, and the federal government of Australia announced earlier this month it will treat laser pointers much like firearms, which, in Australia, is really saying something. The restrictions come as a reaction to incidents (not confined to Australia) in which the lasers were trained on planes, distracting pilots.

5 of 491 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lawful reason by scum-e-bag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a little excessive, and I challenge the govenrment in NSW to define a lawful reason. I can think of a logical reason (if you can call it logical).

    This whole exercise is not much more than a political diversion. Sydney has some major water/traffic/infrastructure/social/political problems. Rather than deal with them and have everyone talking about how bad the public transport is to the outer suburbs (for example), get everyone talking about laser pointers!!! The lower classes lap it up. It's exactly the same tactic as the Tasmanian governments tactic to push for a state bogan-ball team in the national competition, while avoiding the more pressing issue of two deputy leaders being sacked for corruption within a very short space of time.

    It's got very little to do with safety and much more to do with politics and power.
    --
    Does it go on forever?
  2. Re:While we're at it... by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When I found out that it was legal to own and buy a 300mW laser pointer, I was actually quite suprised. Those are really quite hazardous without 'sensitive' handling. No one really cares about burning through paper or popping balloons, but the 'and might blind bystanders, even with just beam scatter' is IMO a good enough reason to restrict their usage.

    Unlike arcwelders, or cars, I can't think of a lot of good reasons for a high intensity laser.

    Having them available to 'everyone' in my opinion vastly increases the probabilty of a random fool doing something foolish.

    But then, I think the same about firearms too, except even there there's 'real' self defense possibilities.

  3. Re:Lawful reason by Spasemunki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we're going to ban everything that isn't safe for use by drunken children, we're not going to be left with much that's legal.

  4. Re:It's only class 3 and 4 lasers by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, a classical American response would be to point out that if you own a DVD burner, you already have a more-powerful laser than many of the banned devices.

    But then I guess that's the difference between a country of free people who had to earn that freedom by force, versus a country full of quavering subjects who've been taught, as a culture, that they're not to be trusted.


    Yeah, which explains why it took an American to use a seemingly innocent material like ammonium nitrate fertilizer to kill 170 people in Oklahoma City.

    Give me a break - you can make all of the bullshit Revolutionary analogies you want, the fact is if a US single pilot were blinded by a DVD-homebrew-laser we'd all be forced to get permits for our DVD burners. For fucks sake, every air traveler in the country has to remove their shoes because one wacko thought he could put a bomb in his loafers.

  5. Re:Lawful reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks for the commentary Mr. Armchair Aviation Security Expert.
    I am an Australia Flight Instructor rated for night flying. The fuckwits target us at least once a week around Melbourne especially on approach (Usually Essendon and Moorabbin too).
    How the fuck am I suppose to fucking land when I have some asshole trying blind me? As another pilot here said (Is that you Rob?) "If I'm flying VFR and I can't fucking see then I am going I'm going to have an accident".
    And what possible political purpose in your dimwit mind of yours could there be to ban high powered laser pointers? A distraction for more serious issues? Are you saying that the possibility of an aircraft crashing into built areas is not serious?