Slashdot Mirror


NASA Responds To MMO Concerns

Sean Hollister writes "GameCyte contacted Daniel Laughlin, Project Manager of NASA Learning Technologies, to find out where that $3 million budget for their educational MMO actually went. As it turns out, NASA still has the money — they are just planning to use it differently than we thought. Meanwhile, the 'non-reimbursable Space Act Agreement' actually allows the game developer to profit where they might not have, otherwise. 'If it were a government contract, it would be illegal to be paid twice, once by the government and a second time by consumers.'"

4 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Now that's a good deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's true! How did you know?

  2. Re:Now that's a good deal... by electrictroy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd rather see this game developed privately. Why? Because I don't want to see 3,000,000 taxpayer dollars wasted on a stupid game! Rather than WASTE the money, refund it back to the taxpayers struggling to pay their gasoline/food/electricity bills (or give it to the Welfare Department to help the needy).

    People feeding themselves is a more important priority.

    I'm tired of politicians wasting our money when WE NEED IT for our own expenses.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  3. Chuck Norris v NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Chuck Norris once bet NASA he could survive re-entry without a spacesuit.
    On July 19th, 1999, a naked Chuck Norris re-entered the earth's atmosphere, streaking over 14 states and reaching a temperature of 3000 degrees. An embarrassed NASA publically claimed it was a meteor, and still owes him a beer!

  4. Re:Now that's a good deal... by philspear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I am the varcher75 anonymous coward, but not the varcher75 who forgot to login. Mod me up so that I'll still get some credit.