Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

NASA Responds To MMO Concerns

Posted by Soulskill on from the that's-more-like-it dept.

Sean Hollister writes "GameCyte contacted Daniel Laughlin, Project Manager of NASA Learning Technologies, to find out where that $3 million budget for their educational MMO actually went. As it turns out, NASA still has the money — they are just planning to use it differently than we thought. Meanwhile, the 'non-reimbursable Space Act Agreement' actually allows the game developer to profit where they might not have, otherwise. 'If it were a government contract, it would be illegal to be paid twice, once by the government and a second time by consumers.'"

5 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Now that's a good deal... by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is how I seem to understand all of this debarcle...

    Nasa wants to make a game.
    They have a paltry $3mill budget to make it.
    They decide to not pay the developers to make it, but let them profit from making the Nasa game.
    The game developer has to make what is likely going to be a dull drab game (compared to other space MMO standards) and as a reward is ALLOWED to make money off said game.

    Now is it just me, or is this utterly setting yourself up for a fall? Not only do you not get to have all the aliens and things running about in your game, you probably won't get to run about conquering and destroying, and due to budgets and the likely developers who would actually GO FOR THIS deal, you will likely end up with a B-Grade MMO that looks totally like a B-Grade MMO.

    Is this really a smart step for Nasa? If you can't do it properly or well enough, sometimes it is indeed better not to do it at all.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:Now that's a good deal... by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      The game developer has to make what is likely going to be a dull drab game Come on! Adjectives like dull and drab hardly describe working at NASA! Imagine a game where you have to beg for money from diplomats, fight off the disgruntled engineers after more budget cuts, all the while being bound up by several rolls of red duct tape! (It's not just used on apollo missions!)

      I for one can see millions of people paying $20/month for the privilige!


      Wake me up when the spin doctors are done.
      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Now that's a good deal... by iNaya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's probably not as stupid as it sounds.

      There's probably already a game company out there that has thought about implementing some kind of game based on NASA. Now with NASA offering free advice, knowledge and who knows what else, it would be an ideal opportunity for a game developer who may already have something in the works.

      Not only that, but they will probably be able to get an official NASA endorsement + free advertising on the NASA website.

      Could actually work out well for both sides, and we may get a cool game from it.

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
  2. You can't make a B grade MMO for 3 million by patio11 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know if the government bureacrats quite understand how fast asset production eats through money. Its insane, and it continues getting more insane because increasing hardware capability leads to increased asset production cost AND the winner-take-most leaders in the MMORPG space are running away from the field qualitatively. You can make an MMORPG for $3 million, sure, but it will be like comparing Pine to GMail. Hint: people who enjoy MMORPGs do not typically choose Pine over GMail. (Pipe down, you. You're atypical. Ask the other folks in your WoW guild.)

    Maybe someone could clue the NASA folks in. "Hiya guys, MMORPG has costs approaching that of programming control code for the shuttle." "Gadzooks! Why, $3 million wouldn't cover the header file on the system clock function!" "Yeah, its sort of like that. Except minus the defense contractor slush fund. But mostly like that."

    --
    Help poke pirates in the eyepatch, arr.
  3. No one would want to? by CannonballHead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not? Think of it... NASA endorsement and advertising. Sure, maybe a major game studio isn't going to, but if people are willing to work on, say, open source projects where you pretty much won't make any money and never will, why wouldn't a relatively new game company try to work on it and get their name out there in a big way? It would be like an unknown composer (like me) getting to work gratis on a video produced by a major video studio. You don't get money, but you get your name out there in a big way, and if you do WELL, it would do wonders for future job contracts.