Slashdot Mirror


Who Runs RIAA's Settlement Information Center?

eatonwood writes "Who is behind the RIAA's collections efforts? This comment at CallFerret says it is a company called PSC and lists a bunch of websites and contact information for them, but the connection to RIAA is still not completely clear (aside from the presence of a couple of clearly RIAA sites on the same server as PSC's). Anyone know anything more about who is doing RIAA's dirty work?"

8 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious answer... by Manip · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Satin himself...

    1. Re:Obvious answer... by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... Satin himself... Satin? Oh, right, the guy who tempted Jesse for Fort 'n' Daze in the Dessert.
      --
      ~ C.
  2. Re:This is a tough one... by Rakeris · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm gonna go with retarded monkeys. That is awfully insulting to monkeys...
    --
    If brute force isn't working, you are not using enough.
  3. Re:I know I'll get modded down for this comment by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I think I'd at least start collecting evidence that would hold up in court rather than trying to send people scary letters and cross my fingers that would do. RIAA's consistent abuse of the legal system is what I think stings me the most. Organizations set up to protect a business can and do survive without succumbing to such strategies.

    But then again... Maybe I would on the other hand want to be a successful lawyer enough to fall for these things, I'm not saying I'm perfect. If I were a lawyer, I'd want to be successful, and it's obviously a reasonably successful strategy for them, or else they wouldn't keep doing it. It depends on how much of a jerk I'd be willing to become.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  4. Re:I know I'll get modded down for this comment by DingerX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm against shoplifting, but I don't think that gives storeowners the right to summarily execute anyone they suspect of the crime.

    That's really the point. For music, we all believe that artists should get remunerated for their work. Want makes the RIAA evil is that (A) they don't work in the interests of the artists, and (B) their approach to their customers is insulting, intimidating, disdainful and invasive. Some would use stronger words.

    The RIAA right now is waging a campaign against music fans, in the name of artists (many of whom do not support their name being so used), and gee, if the people's rights, liberties and freedoms are caught in the crossfire, so be it. Hey, we can even reduce those too!

  5. Re:I know I'll get modded down for this comment by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What if you began to notice you were no longer making $40,000 a year and ended up making only $20,000 a year? Would you give up the art that you love?

    I'd probably give it up when I realised I was paying $39,000 a year "protection money" to the RIAA.

    The RIAA do *not* have the artists' interests at heart, except in so far as that if the artists aren't making money, the RIAA can't extort it from them.

  6. Re:Mods == fags by dintech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indeed. I had to give up the fags. I was getting through ten a day. Sometimes up to twenty on a big night out. When I had that many I used to feel really bad when I woke up in the morning. Also lots of people complained about the smelly butts. I think I was desensitized to the smell and never noticed. I never could tell my parents about it either, I always had to have a shower before I saw them in case they could tell. I felt ashamed and I'm glad I quit.

  7. Re:Organized Prank Calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi,

    I'm calling from Nigeria, and I downloaded around 1500 of your songs. Now I'm willing to pay your fee, but in order to do so I must first secure my payments. So I need about $50000, to be deposited on bank account BIC415.201.25521.33. And then I will be happy to pay you the millions of dollars you claim I owe you.