Slashdot Mirror
The File-System Fallout of the Reiser Verdict
perlow writes "Yesterday, the Open Source community took an emotional hit when veteran Linux programmer Hans Reiser was convicted of first degree murder in the suspicious disappearing of his wife, Nina. While I won't go into the details of the case, as this has been covered extensively in the press, I would like to talk a little bit about how this verdict will impact the technology in play for file system dominance in our favorite Open Source operating system, Linux."
It will affect ReiserFS the same as it affected the company that wrote the NTFS file system was convicted of their crimes. (being a monopoly).
Or when the creator of Unix (and the C language) was convicted of their crimes (being a monopoly)
Or the same as it affected Union Carbide when they poisoned a whole town killing everyone. (the former president will be jailed for life if he ever sets foot in India).
The thing is.. Things are decided on their merits, and price, etc. Not on their creators. Otherwise, Walmart would be bankrupt!
What are we going to do tonight Brain?
All that's happened is that the primary developer has a lot more spare time on his hand to hack. I presume he'll be spending the rest of his life in prison; assuming he's allowed access to a computer, he can continue development on ReiserFS. And if the implementation is open source, any risk of Reiser sneaking in logic bombs as revenge will be mitigated by the many other eyes that will have access to the source. If he never writes another line of code to continue development of ReiserFS, then anyone else who wants to will be able to pick up the project and work on it. True, they won't have his original vision or technical brilliance, but that's not to say that the project must die with its creator. We wouldn't be able to advance very far at all technologically speaking if a project could not survive its originator.
You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
I don't think you missed anything. Without commenting on his guilt(or not) or mental state, it can be said and seen that in other F/OSS projects developers come and go. Obviously the original designer is always a bad thing to lose but that hardly means the demise of the project if others understand what the originator intended and implemented.
Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
File systems are like programming languages and operating systems: inventing one is not only fun, but a common assignment during one's computer science education at a lot of universities. Therefore, there will always be more types of file systems around, than anybody would reasonably need. Reiser was a putz, and the benefit of his filesystem over the competition was always marginal. So, he's gone, and either somebody else will grab the torch and maintain his software, or it'll die and nobody will care.
Its stable, its been widely used, has great performance, and can handle most 'large' filesystems. Its not a 'newcomer' to the kernel, either.
-- dieman - Scott Dier
Morons with mod points; either that or Microsoft knee-jerk astroturfers.
For the learning-impaired at "news for nerds", the parent's point was that the only thing that should matter to you or me about Hans Reiser is the file system he designed and the programs he wrote, and then only if you use the damned things.
Did you throw away your Naked Gun movies because OJ Simpeon killed those people?
The tabloid mentality that seems to have overtaken the entire world makes me sick. The file system's designer's personal life is none of my (or your) business.
On a lighter note, the parent was wrong. Bill Gates doesn't strangle puppies, he shoots them! And he doesn't stomp kittens' heads, he huffs them.
mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
> Since no one had stepped up to the plate before now, I'm betting against anyone doing so in the future.
This doesn't make sense. There's a clear reason why nobody stepped up before: Hans Reiser. The guy was clearly a bit of a nutbag, however competent he may be at designing filesystems, and I surely wouldn't have wanted to wage a very public and protracted battle with him over his pet project.
There are lots of projects that can use programmers and leadership. One that has nobody running it is a lot more attractive to take over than one where the original creator is going to be lurking hatefully in the background, looking for an opportunity to stab you in the back. (Figuratively; but perhaps in Reiser's case, literally.)
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
Only in the world of those raised on television lawyers does this sort of nonsense play out. In reality, there was physical evidence against Reiser. I have to say that in any one of those juror's positions, I would have voted for him to be found guilty. He's a bad guy. That he also developed an impressive file system doesn't mean that he's not a murdering sonofabitch. The two can live inside the same head.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Back to filesystems: thought it wasn't terribly common, I did have a ReiserFS filesystem throw up on me once a long time ago. Luckily I was just tinkering with a new distro at the time so there was no "real" data on it that was lost, but it could have been problematic. Althought not as "sexy" of a solution as many of the newer filesystems, I've had very good luck with plain old ext3 over the last few years.
"People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
It's an amazing filesystem, and as far as I knew a few years ago, the only one capable of scaling performance reasonably for extremely large directories.
ext3 supports huge directories. Implementing a hash table to store directories entries instead of a linked list isn't exactly rocket science.
He can appeal, of course, and as I understand it, it's a technical case that they have against him, so there's a stronger chance that an appeal could work than if there were direct evidence of his actions.
I guess if his wife turns up in Russia he'll be set free fairly quickly. I don't rate the chances of an appeal at the moment though.
Rich.
libguestfs - tools for accessing and modifying virtual machine disk images
Yeah, it's odd. Lots of things about this case were odd. But that's why we pay people to spend months and months sifting through these things, rather than deciding them via Slashdot.
First he will be bathed, then there will be cake.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
>I will say that there sure seems to be reasonable doubt.
There was some reasonable doubt, and jurors are saying that Hans' own testimony removed that doubt for them.
Having been denied -- by the defendant -- the option of acquitting on the basis of reasonable doubt, the jury
unanimously convicted him. They were convinced that he killed his wife, that he meticulously planned the coverup, that he had no sympathy for her, and that he lied on the stand.
There was reasonable doubt in this case until Hans testified. He removed that doubt by giving concrete answers to questions. That was a mistake, and he was warned that it would be a mistake.
-fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
People die all the time. Are you saying that we should never do anything except discuss them?
If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
I don't rate the chances of an appeal at the moment though. Well, appeals are matters of law, not of guilt or innocence, typically. While the case against him has substantial issues (including his wife's friend having admitted to being a serial killer), the primary concern in an appeal is the validity of the process that lead to the conviction. If there's a process problem, then an appeal can work, and in purely technical cases (where there is no body, witnesses or confession), there are usually any number of possible angles for process questions to be raised.
That's not a statement about Reiser, his guilt, or the legal system, it's just the way it typically plays out from what I understand. Then again, I learn what I know second-hand and some of that gets polluted by the horrendously inaccurate information that I get from popular culture.
We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace