Slashdot Mirror


The File-System Fallout of the Reiser Verdict

perlow writes "Yesterday, the Open Source community took an emotional hit when veteran Linux programmer Hans Reiser was convicted of first degree murder in the suspicious disappearing of his wife, Nina. While I won't go into the details of the case, as this has been covered extensively in the press, I would like to talk a little bit about how this verdict will impact the technology in play for file system dominance in our favorite Open Source operating system, Linux."

67 of 605 comments (clear)

  1. Dear Windows Users... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...Bill Gates strangles puppies & treads on the heads of kittens.

    Please stop using NTFS.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Dear Windows Users... by rrkap · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Bill Gates strangles puppies & treads on the heads of kittens.


      Please stop using NTFS.

      But at least Bill Gates hasn't killed his wife.

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    2. Re:Dear Windows Users... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait 'til he writes his own filesystem... Then, Melinda watch out!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Dear Windows Users... by rrkap · · Score: 4, Funny

      He did. But the FAT file system has only succeeded in making others want to kill.

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    4. Re:Dear Windows Users... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, he stole it from the same guy he bought MS-DOS from.
      Nope. It's the other way around. Paterson got FAT from Microsoft, which developed it for Microsoft Standalone BASIC.

    5. Re:Dear Windows Users... by graveyhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Paterson got FAT from Microsoft

      I'm sure he's not the only one.

      Baaazing! Thankyou thankyou I'll be here all night.
      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    6. Re:Dear Windows Users... by dougmc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I guess if you want to debate about what an OS actually is, which does seem to be a pretty popular religious debate. Though it's a bit sillier than most -- vi vs. emacs, Mac vs. PC, Catholics vs. Protestants -- at least these debates MATTER somehow. Is MS-DOS a true OS? Who gives a rats ass? It loaded up Commander Keen, so it was good enough for me!


      Either way, when MS-DOS first came out, I don't recall anybody claiming that it wasn't an operating system.

    7. Re:Dear Windows Users... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When MS-DOS came out, I was working for a company that was busy porting Unix to microprocessors. The people who were doing that found DOS's status as an OS pretty laughable.

      To most people, the "operating system" is the user interface. That's why some vendors get away with calling a collection of AJAX applications a "web OS". But we're not talking about what people perceive an OS to be, we're talking about what an OS does.

      The question of whether some software is an OS is not a religious issue. You take the services a typical OS provides and match them against what the software actually provides. 86DOS provided almost nothing behind the very basic service of loading executable images into RAM and invoking them. Applications had to provide their own functionality for services that any Unix or CP/M user would consider part of the OS: buffered IO, processes scheduling, etc.

      Ironically, that's what created the lockin that made Bill Gates the richest man on the planet: MS-DOS applications were poorly insulated from the underlying hardware, and were thus not very portable. That destroyed the market for platforms that didn't have a high level of compatibility with the original IBM PC. (Which is why IBM's own PS/2-OS/2 effort went nowhere.) And to achieve that level of compatibility, you had to have MS-DOS. Not despite its bugs and limitations, but because of them!

    8. Re:Dear Windows Users... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      But at least Bill Gates hasn't killed his wife.

      That's because she'd kick his ass if he tried ;) Seriously, have you seen Bill Gates? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Dear Windows Users... by Malevolyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what you're saying is I can't blame Bill anymore?

      My life is over.

      --
      Your ad here.
    10. Re:Dear Windows Users... by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you exchange property (say money) for other property (say software, or rights to that software) and both parties are willing participants, it's not usually called stealing. True, for instance in the case of my cable company it's usually called highway robbery.
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    11. Re:Dear Windows Users... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, anything that computes is a computer, and anything that swims in the ocean is a fish. Now go away, the grownups are talking.

  2. A different kind of file system? by adnonsense · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will Hans suddenly develop an interest in cake-based file systems?

    1. Re:A different kind of file system? by ttapper04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yes, but due to the crappy cake served in prison it will be running windows.

    2. Re:A different kind of file system? by kabloom · · Score: 4, Funny

      No. All he needs to do is

      mkdir("tmp");
      chroot("tmp");
      chdir("..");

    3. Re:A different kind of file system? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First he will be bathed, then there will be cake.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. I'm hoping... by gowen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that maybe control of ReiserFS will now be in the hands of someone who is not a total cock... sorry, a wife-murdering total cock. Hans Reiser's ability ot play nice with others made you long for Theo de Raadt's sunny demeanor. Given that the code is Free, having it under the control of someone who is not a complete sociopath can't help but the increase uptake of the novel parts of the ReiserFS structure.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:I'm hoping... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that the code is Free, having it under the control of someone who is not a complete sociopath can't help but the increase uptake of the novel parts of the ReiserFS structure.

      Given that the code is Free, it's always been under the control of anyone who wanted it. Since no one had stepped up to the plate before now, I'm betting against anyone doing so in the future.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:I'm hoping... by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The guy who's been single-handedly maintaining Reiser4 for the past few months sounds pretty well-mannered from what I've seen.

    3. Re:I'm hoping... by ajs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that maybe control of ReiserFS will now be in the hands of someone who is not a total **** Well, I've never been exposed to his inter-personal issues, but in reading the article, the journalist involved seems to think that ReiserFS is dead. I'd be rather surprised if that were the case. It's an amazing filesystem, and as far as I knew a few years ago, the only one capable of scaling performance reasonably for extremely large directories.

      Hopefully, it will simply be forked (if needed) and continue to be developed now that the original author is clearly not going to be around to maintain it... well, maybe he won't. He can appeal, of course, and as I understand it, it's a technical case that they have against him, so there's a stronger chance that an appeal could work than if there were direct evidence of his actions.

    4. Re:I'm hoping... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      The other issue I have with Hans is why didn't clean up the blood properly? You wouldn't see Dave Cutler making that sort of mistake. I think if someone can't clean up blood spatters properly, I wouldn't want them writing kernel mode code. It might have memory leaks.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:I'm hoping... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Since no one had stepped up to the plate before now, I'm betting against anyone doing so in the future.

      This doesn't make sense. There's a clear reason why nobody stepped up before: Hans Reiser. The guy was clearly a bit of a nutbag, however competent he may be at designing filesystems, and I surely wouldn't have wanted to wage a very public and protracted battle with him over his pet project.

      There are lots of projects that can use programmers and leadership. One that has nobody running it is a lot more attractive to take over than one where the original creator is going to be lurking hatefully in the background, looking for an opportunity to stab you in the back. (Figuratively; but perhaps in Reiser's case, literally.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:I'm hoping... by nuzak · · Score: 4, Informative

      > You don't find the fact that his wife had dated a confessed serial killer at all odd?

      Sturgeon has a bit of a credibility problem in that none of the eight people he's confessed to killing are, um, dead.

      And it's "could have".

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:I'm hoping... by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's an amazing filesystem, and as far as I knew a few years ago, the only one capable of scaling performance reasonably for extremely large directories.

      ext3 supports huge directories. Implementing a hash table to store directories entries instead of a linked list isn't exactly rocket science.

      He can appeal, of course, and as I understand it, it's a technical case that they have against him, so there's a stronger chance that an appeal could work than if there were direct evidence of his actions.

      I guess if his wife turns up in Russia he'll be set free fairly quickly. I don't rate the chances of an appeal at the moment though.

      Rich.

    8. Re:I'm hoping... by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't find the fact that his wife had dated a confessed serial killer at all odd? (Not Reiser but the other guy that confessed to several murders) Neither the police nor the judge found the other guy's claims of murder sprees credible. Why should we?

      Yeah, it's odd. Lots of things about this case were odd. But that's why we pay people to spend months and months sifting through these things, rather than deciding them via Slashdot.
    9. Re:I'm hoping... by Xtravar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or, translated to slashdotese, is your pr0n collection gif files or mpegs? This is a little off-topic, but I've always been surprised at how happy some people are with crappy porn collections. I have friends that are happy just getting sample pics from random websites.
      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    10. Re:I'm hoping... by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That contradicts every news story I've read, and the Wired blog. It also contradicts the cops who for months said there was no blood in the house or the car.

      Can you please cite a source than can explain some of this?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:I'm hoping... by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess if his wife turns up in Russia he'll be set free fairly quickly.
      I don't rate the chances of an appeal at the moment though. Well, appeals are matters of law, not of guilt or innocence, typically. While the case against him has substantial issues (including his wife's friend having admitted to being a serial killer), the primary concern in an appeal is the validity of the process that lead to the conviction. If there's a process problem, then an appeal can work, and in purely technical cases (where there is no body, witnesses or confession), there are usually any number of possible angles for process questions to be raised.

      That's not a statement about Reiser, his guilt, or the legal system, it's just the way it typically plays out from what I understand. Then again, I learn what I know second-hand and some of that gets polluted by the horrendously inaccurate information that I get from popular culture.

  4. The same as it affected... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 5, Insightful


    It will affect ReiserFS the same as it affected the company that wrote the NTFS file system was convicted of their crimes. (being a monopoly).

    Or when the creator of Unix (and the C language) was convicted of their crimes (being a monopoly)

    Or the same as it affected Union Carbide when they poisoned a whole town killing everyone. (the former president will be jailed for life if he ever sets foot in India).

    The thing is.. Things are decided on their merits, and price, etc. Not on their creators. Otherwise, Walmart would be bankrupt!

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  5. Re:Answer= by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    you missed a " ' ".

  6. Article a bit one-sided? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't it true that much of Reiser4 is already coded? Since Reiser is GPL 2, there is nothing to stop the remaining developers -- or anyone else -- from picking up the ball and running with it. Namesys hired at least 1 or 2 full-time developers other than Reiser, although my guess is that since their Web site is currently down, there is probably nothing left of Namesys since Namesys is/was mostly Reiser, his (still missing, possibly deceased) wife Nina, and Reiser's father.

    So, probably with no money, my guess is the hired hands won't continue work, but I am unable to speak for them.

    Still, ReiserFS could continue without Hans, right?

    1. Re:Article a bit one-sided? by Traxxas · · Score: 5, Informative

      True, the other developer moved the code and patches to his server months ago when the namesys.com site went down.
      Rieser 4 Patches and Programs

      According to the article they are still in active development. They got patches for the 2.6.25 kernel so somebody is still working over there.
      Source Article

  7. So what? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All that's happened is that the primary developer has a lot more spare time on his hand to hack. I presume he'll be spending the rest of his life in prison; assuming he's allowed access to a computer, he can continue development on ReiserFS. And if the implementation is open source, any risk of Reiser sneaking in logic bombs as revenge will be mitigated by the many other eyes that will have access to the source. If he never writes another line of code to continue development of ReiserFS, then anyone else who wants to will be able to pick up the project and work on it. True, they won't have his original vision or technical brilliance, but that's not to say that the project must die with its creator. We wouldn't be able to advance very far at all technologically speaking if a project could not survive its originator.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  8. Develop from Prison by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    25 years of coding in prison might yield some significant product. You can put him away physically, but I think we should still let his brilliant mind to continue to benefit the society.

    1. Re:Develop from Prison by Applekid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. I look forward to PrisonFS, where you can hide cigs inside the hard drive and they just look like ordinary files, kernel modifications to allow for self-tattooing code (with needles of questionable sterility, of course), and a new kind of distributed computing system where workgroups of computers can form a sort of "gang" in which they bust caps in other competing computers that gain access to their LAN.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Develop from Prison by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Imagine how he's going to feel when he realizes all the computers run Windows 2000.

    3. Re:Develop from Prison by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      They used to run Windows ME, but the Supreme Court ruled that cruel and unusual.

  9. Re:Answer= by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think you missed anything. Without commenting on his guilt(or not) or mental state, it can be said and seen that in other F/OSS projects developers come and go. Obviously the original designer is always a bad thing to lose but that hardly means the demise of the project if others understand what the originator intended and implemented.

  10. Good sience and inovations stands apart by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from the quirks of the inventor.

    If this file system is superiour, then it should stand.

    However naming the delete function 'Wife' would be lacking in class....

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Not a lot, really by Garridan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    File systems are like programming languages and operating systems: inventing one is not only fun, but a common assignment during one's computer science education at a lot of universities. Therefore, there will always be more types of file systems around, than anybody would reasonably need. Reiser was a putz, and the benefit of his filesystem over the competition was always marginal. So, he's gone, and either somebody else will grab the torch and maintain his software, or it'll die and nobody will care.

    1. Re:Not a lot, really by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also do a web search for milFS. It's a great file system.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  12. Stupid Article by FranTaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't even mention XFS.

  13. XFS by dieman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its stable, its been widely used, has great performance, and can handle most 'large' filesystems. Its not a 'newcomer' to the kernel, either.

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
  14. Offtopic? WTF? by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Morons with mod points; either that or Microsoft knee-jerk astroturfers.

    For the learning-impaired at "news for nerds", the parent's point was that the only thing that should matter to you or me about Hans Reiser is the file system he designed and the programs he wrote, and then only if you use the damned things.

    Did you throw away your Naked Gun movies because OJ Simpeon killed those people?

    The tabloid mentality that seems to have overtaken the entire world makes me sick. The file system's designer's personal life is none of my (or your) business.

    On a lighter note, the parent was wrong. Bill Gates doesn't strangle puppies, he shoots them! And he doesn't stomp kittens' heads, he huffs them.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny
      For the learning-impaired at "news for nerds", the parent's point was that the only thing that should matter to you or me about Hans Reiser is the file system he designed and the programs he wrote, and then only if you use the damned things.

      Actually, no. I really meant that Bill Gates strangles puppies & treads on the heads of kittens.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you throw away your Naked Gun [wikipedia.org] movies because OJ Simpeon [sic] killed those people?

      The Naked Gun doesn't require maintenance. Code does, especially when it has several outstanding issues (show of hands, who here likes the quality of reiserfsck?) and how fast the kernel iterates.

      Namesys is dead in the water, and reiserfs will go with it.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    3. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope but ReiserFS3 is pretty old and only getting a few bug fixes and no new features.
      Reiserfs4 is pretty much dead... Unless somebody picks up the code and runs with it which could happen but I really wouldn't bet the server farm on that.
      The simple truth is "Big Deal"
      You currently have a choice between.
      EXT3 which isn't the fastest but it does work.
      JFS which is pretty feature rich and stable.
      and XFS which is also feature rich and stable.
      EXT 4 is coming soon and ZFS may be GPLd at some point.
      The lose of ReiserFS to bit rot isn't the end of the world or really that big of a deal.
      Now the lose of Hans Reiser. Well if he didn't do it then it is very sad. If he did do it then it is also very sad. That is just on the human level and nothing to do with FOSS.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But.. OJ was found not guilty.

      What are you saying, there? The courts got it wrong?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by Omnifarious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I consider any filesystem that can't handle thousands of small files in a single directory to be broken. And Hans Reiser's whole point about naming systems in his initial paper about Reiser 3 is perfectly true and seems to be being ignored by most people creating filesystems.

  15. But... by initialE · · Score: 4, Funny

    The cake is a lie. And seriously, everyone knows that Hans shot first, why is this article even news?

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  16. Re:What happened? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only in the world of those raised on television lawyers does this sort of nonsense play out. In reality, there was physical evidence against Reiser. I have to say that in any one of those juror's positions, I would have voted for him to be found guilty. He's a bad guy. That he also developed an impressive file system doesn't mean that he's not a murdering sonofabitch. The two can live inside the same head.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  17. Re:ReiserFS sucked anyways by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If he is a half-assed coder why don't you write a better filesystem. Why is this form of rebuttal always trotted out? One's inability to do any better doesn't invalidate their original criticism. All those rejects on American Idol auditions are pretty half-assed singers and I can recognize that plainly (as can most people), but I'm certainly not going to claim I can do better because I know I suck as a singer.

    Back to filesystems: thought it wasn't terribly common, I did have a ReiserFS filesystem throw up on me once a long time ago. Luckily I was just tinkering with a new distro at the time so there was no "real" data on it that was lost, but it could have been problematic. Althought not as "sexy" of a solution as many of the newer filesystems, I've had very good luck with plain old ext3 over the last few years.
    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  18. ReiserFS was already dead before today by leet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used ReiserFS for years but it's already dead. I left it shortly after the trial began because it was already having stability problems. After some time it would deteriorate and eventually corrupt itself. Today's doesn't change the fact that ReiserFS hasn't seen much development in the last ~2 years.

    I was sad when I found out he was on trial. I had one of his quotes on my cubicle wall from him about development when I found out about the arrest. Hans Reiser is a good developer. Apparently he's not a very good person.

    Recent versions of ReiserFS have had stability and performance problems for some time and will die a normal open source death on merits.

  19. I'm hoping we'll forget this now by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ReiserFS isn't even a has-been file system, it's an almost-was, and was never a real contender for a top filesystem, no matter how much some users loved it. It was, in reality, half dead by the time Reiser got arrested.

    Why wasn't it taken seriously by everyone?
    - When it encountered problems, it crashed spectacularly. You didn't just lose a file or a block of a file, you lost entire trees and could get metadata instead of file data and vice versa.
    - It lacked basic tools, like "dump"/"restore" or "freeze".
    - The fsck rebuild process was a security nightmare. A user could craft a file with data that would appear to the fsck process to be metadata, and take over the system after a reboot. In typical arrogance, the solution was "don't reboot, then".
    - It didn't support streams or compatible metadata, thus no Mac sharing or SELinux. SELinux in particular is a requirement for many big corporations right now, and not supporting it means no buy.

    And, yes, the arrogance of the maintainer played a part too. But even with a much nicer guy running the show, it would not have been a serious contender for the throne.

    It's time we forget ReiserFS and move on.

    1. Re:I'm hoping we'll forget this now by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Funny

      hey, go easy on him! At least he took a stab at it!

      --
      blah blah blah
    2. Re:I'm hoping we'll forget this now by punkrocher · · Score: 3, Funny

      - When it encountered problems, it crashed spectacularly. You didn't just lose a file or a block of a file, you lost entire trees and could get metadata instead of file data and vice versa. You could say it lost entire bodies of data... I'll be here all week! Thanks!
      --
      I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable. There is something unfair about its use. It is hitting be
    3. Re:I'm hoping we'll forget this now by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Funny

      good thing we only use them for backups, thanks to the tail packing (any other fs with that feature?)


      Well, I'm fairly sure that Hans' knowledge of "tail packing" will expand significantly now.
      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  20. XFS by perlow · · Score: 2, Funny

    See, you forget one little file system, and someone gets pissed. XFS is nice, but its not exactly in widespread use.

  21. NTFS??? by mishehu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The blog even mentions NTFS as potentially a default FS for linux distros? I almost thought that this was april fools again. In fact, perhaps the author of the blog should see comments that Hans has made about NTFS. (I believe they were something to the effect of "WTF was Microsoft smoking?")

    Reiser4 has been great especially in applications such as maildir storage, where we have thousands of files in each directory. Can NTFS do tail packing? What about treeing instead of bitmapping the filesystem? I think not. Hell, I bet ext3 would choke as well with a dir of 15,000 files. I have no problems with reiser4.

    From a PIII-733 w/384MB RAM and a simple IDE 30GB HD:

    time ls -l > /tmp/bah.lst

    real 0m20.071s
    user 0m5.873s
    sys 0m6.518s

    That's on a directory with over 120,000 small files in it (it's from a maildir). I somehow doubt that NTFS or ext3 would be even half this fast at something as trivial as ls on this dir.

    I honestly don't care whether or not he killed his wife. I only care about having the filesystem. I don't know how much Edward Shishkin is going to continue maintaining the code base now. I will greatly lament the loss of Reiser4.

  22. Re:What happened? by jjohnson · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. There was strong circumstantial evidence that Nina had disappeared because she was murdered:
      1. she didn't show up to pick up the kids from school on the day she was supposed to
      2. friends and family testified that she loved the kids and would never abandon them
      3. friends and family hadn't heard from her in two years
      4. her passport was found, meaning she didn't take it with her if she left herself
      5. her bank accounts were untouched in two years, and showed no abnormally large withdrawals before her disappearance
      6. no travel plans or evidence like a plane ticket was ever located for her
      7. her van was found with her cell phone and $146 in groceries in it, several miles from her apartment.
    2. There was evidence that Hans knew she was gone before it was reported: He went to pick up the kids on the day she didn't; he never tried to phone her immediately after her disappearance.
    3. Lots of weird stuff that could plausibly, but not conclusively, be construed as Hans covering up moving her bloody body in his car: removing the passenger seat, hosing out the interior, a 6" bloodstain on a sleeping bag cover kept in the car.
    4. Miscellaneous other stuff that looks suspicious in context of everything else.

    Now, you're right, that list alone creates a plausible but by no means airtight case that he killed her and disposed of the body. If that were all, I probably would have voted to acquit if I were on the jury.

    But then Hans took the stand for eleven days, against his attorney's advice, and tried to explain all that. And he did such a massively poor job of it that the jury believed he was lying about why he'd done those things. He said he removed the passenger seat because he was sleeping is his car and wanted extra space; but in a Honda CRX, the passenger seat is probably the most comfortable part of the car to sleep in, and removing it leaves a non-flat surface with bolts and bars across it (Hans said that with a good sleeping bag he didn't notice). There was an inch of water in the interior because he hosed it out; Hans said he doesn't remember it bothering him, sleeping on the floor where the passenger seat used to be.

    Since there's little worth lying about that's more important than being falsely convicted of murder, the jury concluded that his lies were covering up a murder. In short, he talked himself into jail. He's not the first defendant to do that.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  23. We still have millions of Linux programmers... by Doug52392 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The blog post makes it sound like Reiser was the supreme overlord of the Linux operating system, and that his prison sentence means that Linux will be destroyed...

    Folks, get over it! These things happen! People make mistakes, mess up, or wind up in jail, but everyone adjusts to the change. Just use ext3! Or better yet, if your so worried about it, MAKE YOUR OWN DAMN FILE SYSTEM (but just don't become homicidal in the process)

    Linux is worked on by MILLIONS OF PEOPLE worldwide. SO that means one persons departure will NOT destroy Linux, since there are still PLENTY more people to work on it. Remember the Gizmondo? That got ruined because of one of the owners' connections to the mafia. Most of the board of directors and CEOs wound up in prison, so the Gizmondo was canceled. But the difference here is that WE HAVE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TO PICK UP THE PIECES!

    I will only be worried when EVERY Linux programmer in the world winds up in prison...

  24. Re:Reasonable Doubt by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >I will say that there sure seems to be reasonable doubt.

    There was some reasonable doubt, and jurors are saying that Hans' own testimony removed that doubt for them.

    Having been denied -- by the defendant -- the option of acquitting on the basis of reasonable doubt, the jury
    unanimously convicted him. They were convinced that he killed his wife, that he meticulously planned the coverup, that he had no sympathy for her, and that he lied on the stand.

    There was reasonable doubt in this case until Hans testified. He removed that doubt by giving concrete answers to questions. That was a mistake, and he was warned that it would be a mistake.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  25. Re:prison reform? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Informative


    >Does such a system exist in the US?

    Yes, each state has a different system and there is also a federal system.

    In California there are four classes that correspond to UK's A-D.
    And conditions vary a great deal between prisons. At one end of the spectrum we have hell holes like
    Pelican Bay or Folsom, where inmates are basically stored until they die, and the security is primarily designed to keep them from killing each other. At the other end, there are prisons with open dormitories, large campuses, gate passes, education programs on the level of a state university, even one where the labor details work out in the forest (logging, of course).

    But Reiser with his insults to the judge, has pretty much assured himself of life without parole in Pelican Bay. He will be lucky to get his own ration of toilet paper (you have to ask for it every time, and they give you just a little bit, because they don't want you to have a pillow, or to make dice, or to feel privileged enough to have toilet paper.)

    After a few years of not being violent and working at some crummy job, he might be in a position to go someplace nicer, or at least have a private cell with a tv and reading/writing material. No California inmate gets individual access to any kind of computer system, except for certain highly supervised library research purposes and some vocational training programs. But a person doing life without parole isn't eligible for vocational rehab -- they aren't leaving prison except in a box, period, and so the opportunities go to offenders with lower fines.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  26. Re:Incorrect focus by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People die all the time. Are you saying that we should never do anything except discuss them?

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  27. Re:What happened? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Now, you're right, that list alone creates a plausible but by no means airtight case that he killed her and disposed of the body."

    It doesn't need to be much more than "plausible." The jury decided that there was no room for reasonable doubt. If all juries were required to have "airtight" evidence before convicting, Charles Manson would be a free man (recall that he meticulously ensured he had no direct hand in the murders). It's possible that he didn't kill her. It's possible it was the Chinese spies, or Al Qaeda, or the GNAA trolls that killed her instead. But every last member of the jury concluded that there was only one likely explanation.

    "Since there's little worth lying about that's more important than being falsely convicted of murder, the jury concluded that his lies were covering up a murder. In short, he talked himself into jail. He's not the first defendant to do that."

    His was not the only testimony in the trial; after all, he hired professional attorneys to represent him, who had the ability to present evidence and testimony in his defense, as well as challenge the testimonies of those against him. There was far more in this trial than Reiser's testimony alone, this has been going on for several months now.

    It is possible that the jury improperly convicted him because his testimony prejudiced them, but I have yet to see any juror interviews where one said "I was going to acquit until he took the stand," and even if one came anywhere near saying that, that's what the appeals process is for.

    Yes, it really is possible for someone from your community to brutally murder someone. It's time to move past the "denial" phase, before I start to point out that the "It's not airtight!" hand-waving is something one would expect from the Intelligent Design camp.

  28. BIOS is the true OS... by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Without the BIOS, I think you'd be hard-pressed to find any OS that would install and run. Therefore, I submit that the BIOS is the true operating system, with everythign else being an abstraction from that low-level functionality.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:BIOS is the true OS... by x2A · · Score: 2, Funny

      It loads the operating system, and provides some essential hardware support, but shouldn't take too much credit, they work as a team, there's no I in BIOS. Crap, unfortunate example... well some newer architectures have left the old BIOS behind anyway and the OS loads from EFI, and there's definitely no I in tha... nevermind.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia