Slashdot Mirror


Reducing the Power Consumption of Overclocked PCs

babyshiori writes "Now, that must sound pretty inane. After all, overclockers employ all kinds of power-guzzling methods to improve their CPUs' overclockability. However, there are many good reasons to do so. In this guide, we will not just look at theoretical tips on reducing power consumption in overclocked PCs, we will also look at how well they work in real-life situations. Best of all, we are shown why they will improve our PCs' power efficiency without any real loss in performance. Start doing your part in saving the planet now!"

11 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Not saving the planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Energy conservation isn't about saving the planet - the planet doesn't care. It's about saving humans. We'll all die out and the planet will quite happily go on without us.

  2. Everyone wants to save megawatts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was going well until I got to 'I can save 13 megawatts per month'. Obviously this article was written by someone who has a deep technical understanding of power and energy consumption, and not just some kid who thinks he is a 'l33t haxor' because he found out how to use the utilities that come with the motherboard to turn his overclocking on and off.

  3. Saving the world by maxume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are really worried about it and you drive, drive less.

    1 gallon of gasoline = 131 megajoules = ~36 kilowatt hours.

    Waving hands around about efficiency and so forth, that's 1 kilowatt hour of energy per mile driven. So that's 5-20 hours of computer use (assuming between 50 and 200 watts, 500 watts is still 2 hours) per mile driven. Using a more efficient computer is good, but finding a way to not drive 5 miles a day is a considerable amount better.

    (If you aren't worried about it, that's fine, but if you are worried about it, for god's sake, do the easy, effective things before you start telling people about the difficult, pretty much a wash things that you are doing.)

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    1. Re:Saving the world by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The other thing to consider is maybe we should look at increasing the lengh of the hardware life cycle rather then constantly cutting it. We should start demanding that software vendors start producing tight efficent code again so that we don't have to keep replacing our machines to use it. We should demand hardware vendors produce platforms that have a long life span with an upgrade path that enables most components to be resused as much and as long as possible.

      These is all speaking of primary systems.

      I had my first PC, and 386DX-20 for almost 10 years(MSDOS and later Windows 3.x added).
      My second system a Gateway P5-90 for about 5 years(MSDOS and Windows 3.x).
      My third system home built Cirix 8686-233 for about 3 years(Windows 95 and later 98)
      My fourth system home built K6-2-450 for about 2 years(Windows 2000, later Slackware 8 after ---------frustration with the performance of win2k)(would have kept it longer but it broke)
      My fifth system now about 8 years old Athlon-800 (Slackware 10.2 and now 12.0 I am even using compmgr on X and enjoying sexy transparent windows!) (works fine with my lowly geforce2-mx400)

      Scary trend in that propriety software world. Other then playing and encoding some video MPEG2 and 4 are fine some of the more recents ones are pretty slow to encode and difficulte to play back properly; I can do just about everthing as well with my 8 year old box as can be done with a brand new one. I chose software that is not wasteful and can thefore get allot of miles out of a machine now. I grant you I am not a PC gamer, I have a Wii for that. I am pretty confident the enviornmental impact of my having replaced this machine at least once if not more then once in the Commercial software world would have been greater then any questionable power efficencies of this older equipment, CRT included. The power draw of PCs has not exactly been trending down in general so its likely new gear would save little there at all if anthing the main offset being an LCD rather then the CRT.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  4. 26megawatts? by Dr.Diesel · · Score: 5, Funny

    He is saving 26megawatts per month? I didn't know Intel made 13.8KV 3-phase E6850s?

  5. Start doing your part in saving the planet now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been hearing a lot of this kind of fluff during earth week.

    If you really wanted to save the planet, you wouldn't be overclocking your computer at all or buying a new car because it was hyrid. You would be beating what you have already consumed until it fell apart from overuse.

    Most of these "earth saving" techniques seem like nothing more than feel good consumerism. Eco this and green that. Nothing more than words.

    And if your computer was burning 24/7 in the development of new energy technologies or new effiencies you would really be saving the planet. And all these real efforts at saving the planet are going to require technology and huge amounts of energy use and chemicals and industry and all that supposedly evil stuff.

  6. Next up in the series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Improving the gas efficiency of your Humvee using proper tire inflation.

  7. Ways to cool CPUs by theurge14 · · Score: 3, Funny

    * Set your desktop background to something like penguins or polar bears
    * Install a screensaver with air conditioning capability.
    * Set your beer on top of the case so the cold will seep down into the computer.
    * Type slower as fast typing causes heat friction. Also avoid CAPS and waving the mouse pointer around too much.
    * Use a lighter color scheme on the desktop instead of dark as dark colors absorb light and generate heat.

  8. 80 Plus by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    He didn't mention 80 Plus power supplies. Not only will you save power, your case will be cooler.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  9. Not so silly by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know why people are being so negative about this article. It isn't trying to convince you that overclocking is the most energy efficient thing to do, it's trying to show you ways you can be more energy efficient if you do choose to overclock. People who overlock do so because they want higher PEAK performance, not because they enjoy wasting energy 24/7. When you're not in need of that peak performance, it only makes sense to go ahead and be efficient.

    The whole article can be summed up by saying:

    1) Be sure to enable whatever idle tech your motherboard/processor supports (speedstep, cool'n'quiet) so that it automatically slows down the CPU and power consumption when not under load.

    2) Try undervolting, use stability tests to find the lowest voltage your particular CPU can use, rather than simply using the default.

    3) If your motherboard/processor comes with some software that lets you configure the clock speed/voltage on-the-fly, go ahead and test stability under different settings and save those configurations and use them when appropriately. I'd add that most video cards have the same type of software these days -- go ahead and overclock them when you're gaming, and be sure to slow them back down when you're done.

    Neither of those should be shockingly new ideas to anyone who's been building computers for years, but anyone new to it should find the article informative in the specifics.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:Not so silly by Zadaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      People are so hard on this article because, for the effort it's taken to write it, the author could have gone outside and planted a tree and done much much more for the environment in total than this article ever will.