Slashdot Mirror


Dan Rutter Suggests Tossing Some Wi-Fi At the Neighbors

A few days ago, Dan Rutter (the Dan in "Dan's Data") published an interesting idea for extending the sort of philanthropic technical pranksterism that spawned throwies by applying the same approach to Wi-Fi. That means, looking what he hopes is not too far down the road, creating Wi-Fi repeaters that are cheap enough to deploy on the sly and frugal enough with power to run on solar power or cheaply replaceable batteries. But as he says, "If you've got a lot of spare money, a ladder and no respect for private property, though, you could already be stealthily deploying Open-Mesh or other such gadgets all over your neighbourhood." In some cities at least, you'd be hard pressed to ever avoid at least one available wireless access point, but that's not the experience for most people, most places -- which bears correction.

8 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting by spikedvodka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's an interesting idea... but here's the thing I can't see the ISPs letting something like this happening.

    Also, what's to prevent somebody from stealing one of the boxes, and causing an outage... or modifying the firmware on one of these boxes to sniff for passwords?

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whats to say that the open network isn't already sniffing for passwords ect.

    2. Re:Interesting by klapaucjusz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, what's to prevent somebody from stealing one of the boxes,

      You need to make sure that the boxes are cheap and plentiful, so that stealing them is about as exciting as stealing a plastic bag from a supermarket.

      causing an outage

      If it's done right (e.g. using mesh networking technology), breaking just a few nodes should not cause an outage.

    3. Re:Interesting by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You need to make sure that the boxes are cheap and plentiful, so that stealing them is about as exciting as stealing a plastic bag from a supermarket.

      How much battery would be required to run something like a WRT54GL at reasonable latitudes assuming the only external power input is solar? I would think that the batteries and solar cells would be the more attractive things to steal, and if you can make them as cheap as plastic bags from a supermarket then you've solved a whole load more problems than community wireless :)
    4. Re:Interesting by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dude, there is nothing magic about an ISP. You could pay for a T1 or so and be your own ISP. You can set up your own hardware. Just be prepared to pay for it - the exact same way your ISP does.

      Being an ISP is not anything that special. You just have to be willing to pay the costs, deal with the business aspects, deal with the legal aspects, and if you have employees, deal with income tax, unemployment tax, etc.

      It's not like being an ISP is something willed or auctioned like season tickets or anything.

      You can be an ISP, or even eliminate needing an ISP. All it takes is money.

      You see, that is what ISPs provide - they handle all the business side of things and charge individual subscribers some reasonable amount for access through cable, DSL, digital cell access, etc.

  2. Re:"hardhack"? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Using wi-fi hardware to make a wi-fi network is hacking now?

  3. Re:I like it by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Service is intended for one household only.

    So? Years back, "service" was intended for one computer. We got ourselves routers because it was quite silly that providers were charging on a per computer basis. It just didn't make sense. Yes, some bits were different, but it were still just that, bits. Story is still the same now.

    --
    It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
  4. Re:I like it by westlake · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So? Years back, "service" was intended for one computer. We got ourselves routers because it was quite silly that providers were charging on a per computer basis. It just didn't make sense

    So they go back to charging you by the megabyte. Full commercial rates for the five to fifteen households you are now servicing.