GPL vs. Skype Back In Court
mollyhackit writes "Hackaday reports that the GPL vs Skype case is going back to court today. This as an appeal to the court's decision Slashdot reported last July. The original case was brought against Skype for the Linux based SMC Skype WiFi phone. The court upheld the GPLv2 and decided that Skype had not gone far enough in meeting section 3 which details how to provide the original source. This time around Skype is apparently trying to argue that the GPL violates anti-trust regulations."
...and the license won!
If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.
Sacred cows make the best hamburger.
Option 3 - the clause that requires them to release code is invalid/only applies to the unmodified version of the code. Option 4 - Chewbacca is a Wookie and therefore the copyright belongs to Skype. Both of these are unlikely but there's not a dichotomy here.
There has to be a car analogy somewhere around here...
Welcome to the new capitalism. What's mine is mine. What's yours is mine. If you attempt to stop me from taking back the things of mine, which you have had the sheer gall to put in your own possession after doing nothing but think them up with your own mind and create them with your own effort, I'll sue your ass.
Ahhh...Following the book : History for geeks
You couldn't fork communism in USSR. They didn't have any upgrade after the 1.917 version...The cosmetic changes of the 1.922 aren't worth to remember and they didn't last anyway. The massive refactoring of Stalin didn't help either. Khrushchev tried extreme programming with the cuba crisis and some clever UI interface codename sputnik...The marketing department (called politburo) ruined all his efforts few years after. In the end Gorbatchev had to sold out the assets.
As you see this is totally different from GPL. You can fork application since the beginning of GPL. See Emacs vs Xmacs.
(I love Slashdot probably the only place on earth where GPL can be seriously compared with communism.)