Slashdot Mirror


China to Regulate Internet Map Publishing

hackingbear writes "After text, pictures, and videos, China starts regulating Internet map publishing (here is the google translation.) The government believes that Internet maps can represent the state's sovereignty and its political and diplomatic positions in the international community — and consequently, inaccurate maps could harm national interests and dignity, produce bad political influences, reveal national secrets and harm national security, in addition to harming consumer interests. So from now on, publishing maps would require approval and (yet another) license from the state survey bureau. That means Google, Yahoo, etc., need to remove China from the map; or maybe they just pay up some officials and their agents to acquire yet another license. And our newest 80Gbps DPI monsters need to be upgraded to identify maps together with porn."

14 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Can they do this? by Serapth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can a country do this?

    Well, considering the Dick Cheney had his house obscured... I suppose the answer is yes. Actually with Google maps the US government has a number of areas blacked out for security reasons.

  2. Re:Can they do this? by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As Google maps are satellite based, how inaccurate can they be?

    The borders go onto the map after the satellite takes the picture. Like, say, the border between China and Tibet.

    rj

  3. Re:Can they do this? by querist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do not believe the satellite based images are the main issue here.

    The Chinese government objects to maps that depict certain regions as being separate sovereign countries, such as Tibet and Taiwan, which the Chinese government holds are both part of China.

    This would be similar to a map being published that showed Alaska as a separate country, or as part of Canada, as opposed to it being part of the USA.

  4. Re:Can they do this? by junglee_iitk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, it was possible in US because Google is US based.

    China will be able to pull this off only because Google wants to do business there.

    Let this be a reason for those who talk about "do no evil" and "Google" in same sentence (except me :) ), as if it is some person and not a corporation whose only thing they are looking for is more money for their shareholders.

  5. Fort Knox on U. S. maps by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish I had tracked this a little more closely, but for a couple of decades ordinary maps of Kentucky in atlases like Rand McNally and Hammond did not indicate the existence of the city of Fort Knox, despite showing far smaller cities.

    It was actually a little bit exciting to see the map in Ian Fleming's novel Goldfinger, showing the United States Bullion Depository located at the intersection of Bullion Boulevard and Gold Vault Road. In those days before Wikipedia and Google Earth, this gave at least one reader frisson of forbidden information. I wondered whether Fleming would be the target of any mysterious reprisals for publishing it.

  6. Maps have propaganda value by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If people get used to seeing "The Republic of Taiwan" instead of the "Shitty, Upstart Province of Formosa (or China's name for it) that Dares Act Independent," then that would give people the expectation that Taiwan is a sovereign country. If China goes to war, then it's not to reclaim a break-away province that has been acting like a renegade, but rather just another conquest like Iraq on Kuwait.

    Maps do have real political value behind them. There are a lot of people in Mexico that would love to see the reconquista of the Southwest, and the Mexican government has said in the past that expanding its territory back into the original territory is its goal. That's actually why the map that Absolut did in their advertising campaign was so controversial in the U.S.

  7. Re:...national secrete... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know China is potentially representing a LOT of money. But, at some point, don't we just say "Fuck China"...and all the rules and regulations and monitoring they are wanting to impose on a system that has worked just fine without them for decades?

    If they want to wall off themselves from the world, then let them. If they don't want to use what a company from another country is doing, fine just block it if you want to (or can) but, quit bitching about everything we free people do outside your fucking borders.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  8. Controlling the truth by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember, in China (and, increasingly more places), the truth is what they tell you it is. Their view on how information is handed out is a little different than ours... Actually, the trend is going the other way. Governments have always tried to control the truth. What is changing is our knowledge of their actions.
    They aren't doing it more, they're just being caught doing it more often.
  9. Re:Can they do this? by Alzheimers · · Score: 4, Funny

    considering the Dick Cheney had his house

    I think you either left out a word or a comma.

  10. A better article by Tungbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This link has more info: http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/2008-03-25/21362099485.shtml

    Google licensed PRC geographic data from Beijing United Map Technology Limited (just a guess translation) who has a electronic map service license from the National Survey Department (apparently the prime driver for the regulatory initiative). The reporter speculates that the regulatory initiave may be related to the competition between Beijing United Map Technology with its duopoly competitior, Beijing Map Advanced Technology.

    The official reasons given by the Deputy Director of the National Survey Department are:
    1. Inaccurate boundaries show parts of PRC as soil of other nations
    2. Omission of south sea islands (disputed islands with Japan)
    3. Omission of Taiwan or labeling of Taiwan as independent
    4. Inaccurate boundaries between administrative regions and dissemination of important geographical data
    5. Annotation of sensitive, nonpublic, or national security information on the map.
              (Think of Dick Cheney's house...)

    Part of Google's objection is that there are no clear laws pertaining to online maps in PRC. Thus the regulators are not acting on a solid foundation. There remains wide spread confuson on what exactly is required by these regulations.

    As for Google's choices, they are actively protesting this initiative. But unless they prevail or pull out of China they would be subjected to their laws and likely to adapt to publishing only authorized versions of PRC maps.

  11. I can see the bookmarks now... by rarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "On this spot in 1989, nothing happened".

  12. Re:And google can move abroad by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the US gov would just get one of the ministers in sweden to lean on their mate in the police force and raid their offices there.

    And thereby show that the US IS as bad as china and that, yes, other countries DO tell other companies what to do with online maps. The US government has problems, but can somebody explain to me why stories that have absolutely nothing to do with the US government still attract US gov flames? This story is about China's oppression and mentions the fact that it may have an impact on a couple of US businesses. How is the US government involved any more than Holland's or France's? Yes, most of Google's censored map areas are in the US, but other countries have made similar requests and had them granted. I'm sure China could too. But that's a whole different ball game than requiring licensing and approval for posting maps...

    Ugh - Maybe I should just filter out ACs...
    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  13. Re:...national secrete... by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Except, there is possibly different ways to say 'Fuck China':

    1) Publish and push data all the way into their living rooms until they cut off the Internet for their people completely.

    2) Publish in a flippant way: publish maps but when it comes to China put a graphic that says sensored by assholes in China.

    3) Publish a website that shows ALL the stuff that China does not want their citizens to see/read/hear so that the entire rest of the world can see/read/hear it and know what Chinese government types have censored from their own people.

    4) invite the Chinese government to come make the rest of the world sensor material for their benefit. I'm not saying war is good, but if you intend to tell them to fuck off they will either hide behind the wall or respond to that message.

    Personally, I believe that no one should be buying ANYTHING made in China. Yes, I know it's next to impossible but I would spend an extra 10% to support companies from my country that make competing products to Chinese products.

    The entire China issue is completely out of hand, and the best way IMO to stop it is to stop dealing with them. Stop buying from them. Stop selling to them. Do not go to the Olympics either. Don't watch the Olympics. In fact, I say we censor China altogether from the world's information, business dealings etc. Don't let them invest in anything anywhere else in the world. Lock up their assets that reside outside of China, close their Embassies... everything.

    Yes, that will eventually hurt their people but it is their people that must overthrow the government in charge at this point.

  14. Here, thar be dragons! by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ahh... but if we remove China from the map, we can actually have an excuse to put "Here, thar be dragons" on the map!

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb