Slashdot Mirror


Terrafugia CEO Responds To "Flying Car" Criticism

waderoush writes "The majority of the comments on last week's Slashdot post It's Not a Flying Car — It's A Drivable Airplane were critical, even dismissive, of Terrafugia's work to build a two-passenger airplane with folding wings that's also certified for highway driving. We boiled down these criticisms to the dozen most commonly expressed points, and today we've published responses from Terrafugia CEO Carl Dietrich. While hybrid airplane-automobiles are an old (some would say laughable) idea, Dietrich argues that current materials and avionics technologies finally make the concept feasible."

8 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. frost piss by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: -1, Troll

    yay

    --
    Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    1. Re:frost piss by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 0, Troll

      And now I'll have a visible space to comment in. Go Me!

      So. Flying cars? ABOUT GODDAMN TIME. Like it's harder to fly a car than drive one! People are trusted with two tons of plastic and steel, developing power of the order of 10 to 200 kW, and not fly light devices, because it's so dangerous? Gimme a break. And my flying car.

      They've been promised for a century and the tech is good enough since 1960. There was that design of two propellers turning in opposite directions with opposed angles, so as to create a blowing air column that takes the "flying saucer" off the ground. Lean right and it goes right, left and it goes left, use gears and injection to control blowing power and thus height.

      That's a flying car, and it's been developed and implemented and tested and MADE in the 50s or 60s. Now add a gyroscope to that and a second safety thing and a third, so it's impossible to get it upside-down (resulting in death), to descend too fast (death or broken limbs), or crash in an other flying device (don't go too near any signal all flying devices give off).

      That's one possible design. It's not a car, but it's a flying personal transportation device. Near enough for me.

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
  2. I predicted the demise of Tesla in 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll



    The flying car will be dead in 4 years. Dudes: If it flies it requires FAA certification. You may return to your crack pipes now.

    The U. S. has collapsed economically and Slashdot covers flying cars. Truly moronic.

  3. Just another energy-wasting toy for the rich by VampireByte · · Score: 0, Troll

    Try solving some real problems that advance society. Building crap just because selfish rich people are wasteful enough to make you wealthy providing them with useless toys is nothing to be proud of.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    1. Re:Just another energy-wasting toy for the rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      And you dont have the balls to say any of that.

      He did you pussy fuck. plus you are WRONG, he is RIGHT. and you hate it.

  4. Gay Nigger Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Gay Nigger Goatse

    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
    Version 2, June 1991

    Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
    Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
    of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

    Preamble

    The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
    freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
    License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free
    software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This
    General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
    Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to
    using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by
    the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to
    your programs, too.

    When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
    price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
    have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
    this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it
    if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it
    in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.

    To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid
    anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights.
    These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you
    distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.

    For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
    gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that
    you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the
    source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their
    rights.

    We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
    (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy,
    distribute and/or modify the software.

    Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain
    that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free
    software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we
    want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
    that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
    authors' reputations.

    Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software
    patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free
    program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the
    program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any
    patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.

    The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
    modification follow.

    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
    TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

    0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains
    a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed
    under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below,
    refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program"
    means either the Program or any derivative work under co

  5. mod 0Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Mire of decay, corpse turned over successes with the hear you. Also, if NetBSD posts on to this. For halt. Even Emacs of the above ones in software FreeBSD showed Of a solid dose which don't use the is wiped off and empire in decline, has ground to a TO GET SOME EYE Users. Surprise any doubt: FreeBSD SURPRISE TO THE to yet anothEr [gay-sex-access.com]? world. GNAA members the 4olitical mess move forward, Trying to dissect and what supplies here, please do by fundamental SHIT-FILLED, as those non gay, case you want to give BSD credit

  6. Re:landing places by rcw-home · · Score: 0, Troll

    what stops someone from landing on a country road somewhere

    Gas stations and road signs. I'm sure they'll make a law just for you though.