Slashdot Mirror


Vatican Says Alien Life Plausible

An anonymous reader writes "According to BBC, the director of the Vatican Observatory stated in an article titled 'Aliens Are My Brother' that intelligent beings created by God could exist in outer space. 'The search for forms of extraterrestrial life does not contradict belief in God. — Just as there are multiple forms of life on earth, so there could exist intelligent beings in outer space created by God.' Mind that this is not the same director who said that evolution is more than a mere theory — that was Father Coyne. I myself agree. There might be intelligent beings created by God in outer space even if there are none here on earth."

13 of 775 comments (clear)

  1. the paranoid in me says-- by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Interesting

    there is a related announcement coming soon from world leaders,
    and this pronouncement from the vatican is so that they don't bleed followers in the mayhem to follow.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:the paranoid in me says-- by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to go all tin foil hat, but this was the exact thought I had as well. There isn't a single aspect of modern life that wouldn't be somehow affected by the announcement that proof of alien life has been found. New religions (and cults) would spring up almost overnight. Industries related to space programs probably quadruple over the next 10 years. Diplomacy between countries is affected, either positively (OK it's us against them now) or negatively (You are not worthy to talk to our Space God). It doesn't matter if it's just microbes on Mars; just confirmation of the possibility of alien life means that everyone is suddenly taking the Drake Equation a lot more seriously. If I'm a world government, or some other group with international power and influence, and I know or suspect that an announcement like this is imminent, I don't want this dropping on the populace light a thunderbolt out of the sky.

    2. Re:the paranoid in me says-- by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Interesting

      there is a related announcement coming soon from world leaders, There is a UFO cult called the Raelians, I did a school paper on them.
      Basically, the cult leader is knee deep in pussy since he started telling people he's Jesus' half brother by way of their shared alien daddy, Yaveh.
      Anyhoo, in his second book, said cult leader mentions that his alien overlords have created another race of intelligent beings, nearby, that don't know about them.

      So if any aliens ever do land, and they don't know what the hell he's talking about, he's covered.

      so that they don't bleed followers in the mayhem to follow They're just covering their ass, just in case. There doesn't need to be any actual aliens, you just need to have all your credible bases covered. What if aliens land and say they never heard about this "god" fellow? Then we say Jesus was unique and we have to spread the good word to the stars!
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  2. Catholics by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apologizing to Galileo, Hell is a metaphor, evolution is real, now aliens could exist. The Vatican is really taking their modernization seriously, aren't they?

  3. What about non-human intelligent earthlings? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 4, Interesting

    just as there are multiple forms of life on earth, so there could exist intelligent beings in outer space created by God This seems to leave open the possibility of undiscovered intelligent species here on earth, or even known species whose intelligence is undiscovered.

    (So long, and thanks for all the fish!)
  4. doubtful by trybywrench · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So does that mean that any intelligent alien life is doomed to hell because they don't have the benefit of baptism and the forgiveness of original sin? Did they get a messiah from the catholic god and does that imply more than one "jesus"?

    Or, being that they are not human and never ate from the garden of eaden does that mean that original sin doesn't apply to them? Better yet, does that make them more holy then humans and therefore closer to the catholic god?

    I don't see how the catholic clergy can just say "yeah alien life doesn't contradict our religeon" without addressing these questiosn.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  5. Galileo? How about Bruno by number6x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bruno suggested that there could be an infinite number of worlds and that they could be inhabited by intelligent life.

    For this they burned him at the stake.

    Galileo was only 'shown the instruments' of torture and placed under house arrest.

    Bruno is the guy they need to apologize to!

    1. Re:Galileo? How about Bruno by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing is, Galileo got the exact same punishment we still use today for his crime, no worse. The only difference is, he committed his crime against Religious authorities and not Secular ones.
            G. was asked to write a defense of his position, in the proper Latin, and submit it to the church. Instead he wrote the defense in Italian so that the average guy could read it, and attempted to make it available to the public before the trial was over. What do we do to people today when a judge gives them some interogatives and they release their answers to the press in an attempt to influence the trial? Right, we find them in contempt and lock them up.
            G. used a character named Simplicio in his dialog, and put words that had been used by some of the church authorities in that character's mouth. He picked quotes that were easy to abuse or make fun of, left out a lot of points that were harder to deal with, and the whole work arguably became a straw man attack. What do most modern judges do if you misquote what they say in court? And what if you said the name you gave a character representing them was only because they claimed their view was simple, but the name you used actually best translated to "simpleton"? What would most judges do today to somebody who publicly called them simpletons and then tried to feed them a line of BS about why? Right, they take people like that, and lock them up.
              It's called contempt of court, and it can have an unlimited sentence right now in the present day, as in telling a reporter they will stay locked up until they name their source, however long it takes. You can argue, and I would, that a spiritual institution shouldn't have the power to be conducting courts or censoring publications at all, but the response the church gave snowballed into serious consequences because Galileo made it into a pissing contest first.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  6. Re:Three cheers for the Catholics! by prestonmichaelh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder, though, how the creation of freaky-ass-bug-eyed aliens would fit into the "God created man is his own image" idea. Perhaps that God is so wacky and cool he can take on any shape?

    Really, I have always thought the "in His own image" thing was taken way to literally. I don't really think God would give Himself a physical body like ours that is inferior to many animals in many ways (we are slower than cheetahs, can't see as well as eagles, can't swim like fish, etc.) Honestly if you get down to it, there are a lot of things that suck somewhat about our bodies (a quasi-flawed design that causes a large percentage to experience lower back pain, etc.). Obviously there are some who would say that God has a "perfect" human body that, since it isn't marred by sin, doesn't have the same flaws, but I honestly think the idea of God having a physical body is kind of silly. I mean, I can't even be in two places at once with my physical body, much less everywhere at once.

    So it comes down to, what does "in His own image" mean? We like much of the creation story in Gensis, I think it is meant to be taken figuratively, not literally. We are set apart from the animals in that we have a conscience and free will. In this way, we are like God. We can basically do whatever we want, and reason about what we want to do. Although I am not a Catholic, I agree with their stance that it is completely possible for alien life to exist (although I think intelligent life, at least that we can/will find anytime soon, is unlikely for other scientific reasons). This alien life could even be "in His own image" as well, since it isn't really a physical appearance thing, and more of a soul/conscience thing.
  7. Re:Might be life? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Riddles? Dude, he'll fucking kill your entire family on a dare from the devil, ask Job!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  8. Re:Mythbusters by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OTOH, I can imagine that the mere act of such a submission to a state of mind can have certain desirable effects (and, of course, also undesirable ones). I don't think it's an accident that many other religions propagate a certain way of "giving up".


    Oh without a doubt. I don't want to go too far off topic, but if I had to speculate about the origins of prayer, I'd say it's actually a clever way of capitalizing on a couple of aspects of the human psyche, such as the fact that we acquire habit through repetition, and our herd-mentality when in large groups. Since a religious person is encouraged to pray as often as possible (for an extreme example, see Islam), the constant repetition reinforces the basic tenets and beliefs in the mind of the believer. The more they repeat it, the stronger the belief becomes. Add to that the fact that humans in large groups respond strongly to simple statements with which they can identify (eg. "No War for Oil", "Meat is Murder", "Zeig Heil", "Zhu Mao Zhuxi wanshou wujiang!" etc.), and you have a pretty good incentive to want to indoctrinate your followers with something like prayer, and encourage them to repeat it whenever they can.
  9. Re:Mythbusters by Empiric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You say "let people die" like you think there's an alternative, other than timing.

    I find this form of argument very strange, though very common--making statements which presume ongoing continuity of life, or consciousness, while denying it. Reality is such that by default people don't die, so God should be blamed if they do, or reality is such that people do die by default, and your complaint is about when exactly it happens... which is it?

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
  10. Re:nitpick by Forge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a little more to it than that.

    1. Go throgh Genesis chapter 1 and write down all the different categories of life forms listed there in the order created.

    2. Go throgh a textbook on evolution with the list you wrote in step one and you will discover something very odd. Same order.

    Not only that but the order is counter intuitive. Specifically, everyone assumed Mammals came before birds ontil the fossil record showed otherwise.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?