Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Fedora 9 a Bit Behind the Curve On Installation

Posted by timothy on from the click-here-but-only-once dept.

bsk_cw writes "Today, many Linux users are getting blasé about the ease with which they can install Linux. Possibly, they've been spoiled by distributions such as Ubuntu, which is actually easier to install than Windows. Unfortunately, Fedora 9, the latest version of this community edition of Red Hat, was a bit too much of a blast from the past for Computerworld's James Turner." (Except for bits about the installation, the review is actually quite positive.)

3 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Shoot! by XanC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine what Fedora 9 would have done to UbuntuDupe's hard drive!!

  2. Re:I guess he never installed Slackware 3.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about the old Gentoo installer?

    You know, a webpage full of instructions.

  3. Re:Of course it's easier to instal than Windows! by swillden · · Score: 4, Funny

    So your big complaint is that a 7 year old OS (SP2 was released in 2004) doesn't install on a device that was released 3 years after it was? And of course, that hardware wasn't widely available until probably a year or two later.

    Damned right. If these idiots would just download a more recent release of Windows XP, with all of the updated drivers in place, they'd have no trouble at all.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.