Slashdot Mirror


Securing Your Notebook Against US Customs

Nethemas the Great points out a piece from Bruce Schneier running in the UK's Guardian newspaper with some tips for international travelers on securing notebook computers for border crossings. A taste of the brief article: "Last month a US court ruled that border agents can search your laptop, or any other electronic device, when you're entering the country. They can take your computer and download its entire contents, or keep it for several days. ... Encrypting your entire hard drive, something you should certainly do for security in case your computer is lost or stolen, won't work here. The border agent is likely to start this whole process with a 'please type in your password.' Of course you can refuse, but the agent can search you further, detain you longer, refuse you entry into the country and otherwise ruin your day."

47 of 1,021 comments (clear)

  1. TrueCrypt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.truecrypt.org/

            * Creates a virtual encrypted disk within a file and mounts it as a real disk.

            * Encrypts an entire partition or storage device such as USB flash drive or hard drive.

            * Encrypts a partition or drive where Windows is installed (pre-boot authentication).

            * Encryption is automatic, real-time (on-the-fly) and transparent.

            * Provides two levels of plausible deniability, in case an adversary forces you to reveal the password:

                1) Hidden volume (steganography â" more information may be found here).

                2) No TrueCrypt volume can be identified (volumes cannot be distinguished from random data).

            * Encryption algorithms: AES-256, Serpent, and Twofish. Mode of operation: XTS.

    1. Re:TrueCrypt by CRG · · Score: 2, Informative

      . . . I think TrueCrypt needs to have an offset for its containers . . .

      It does. The hidden partitions in TrueCrypt start from the end of the file (this allows you to keep the non-hidden partition intact at the front of the file).

      When you enter a password, TrueCrypt first tries to decrypt the random data at the front of the file -- and, if that doesn't look like a TrueCrypt partition, then it tries to decrypt the end of the file where the hidden partition would be.

      So... what you're proposing should already be doable. Create a standard file container of size "Video + N" that contains a hidden container of size "N". Once the hidden partition is set up, simply overwrite the front of your file with the video. TrueCrypt shouldn't complain, because random noise (from the encrypted, standard partition) and a random video file should be equally unintelligible from its perspective.

  2. Not enitrely true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last month a US court ruled that border agents can search your laptop, or any other electronic device, when you're entering the country.

    As they should be able to. Any sovereign nation has the right to control who and what enters the country.

    They can ... keep it for several days.

    No, that would be seizing it. They need a reason to seize it. Customs can search without cause, but they cannot seize things without cause.

    The border agent is likely to start this whole process with a 'please type in your password.' Of course you can refuse, but the agent can search you further, detain you longer, refuse you entry into the country and otherwise ruin your day."

    Not entering your password is not grounds to refuse you entry into the country. On the other hand, lying to US customs IS grounds to ban you from entering the USA for five years.

    1. Re:Not enitrely true... by tinkerghost · · Score: 2, Informative

      They can ... keep it for several days.
      No, that would be seizing it. They need a reason to seize it. Customs can search without cause, but they cannot seize things without cause.

      Actually, they can 'detain' the laptop without cause/warrant/etc. If you would like to wait with it that's your option ---- going on 2 years for some of the people who've filed the suits that resulted in the ruling so you might want to make sure you have some vacation time stored up.

    2. Re:Not enitrely true... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Informative
      Maybe someone can explain why the act of entering the country nullifies my constitutional rights.

      Because legally you have not entered the country until you pass through customs. Up until that point you are in international waters, so to speak.

      If you're not here, you're not under the jurisdiction of our laws.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Not enitrely true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      But if they have the right to search it and you refuse to cooperate, then what choices do they have other than to seize the laptop (arguably you've given them cause by refusing to cooperate) or refuse you entry?

      Not providing a password is not cause. Not providing a password is not refusing to cooperate. That was one of the rulings from the recent court case.

      Cooperating is handing over the laptop to them for them to search, and you can wait for them to finish. What if the battery is dead? What if windows has crashed & won't boot? You have still cooperated.

      Otherwise what you're saying is that they have the right to search it, you have the right to refuse, and they have no legal powers to try to enforce their right - in other words, they don't have the right at all.

      Not at all. They have the right to search it, as is. That is their legal power. You are not required to provide a password. If it's encrypted, it's up to them to decrypt it.

      You do not have the right to refuse a search at the border. If you do not want to take the chance that you will be searched at the border, then do not cross the border.

      You are not required to actively assist a search. For example, Customs might think that you're smuggling something inside your tires, but you are not required to jack up your car and undo the wheel nuts. It's up to Customs to do it.

    4. Re:Not enitrely true... by LargeMythicalReptile · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe someone can explain why the act of entering the country nullifies my constitutional rights. It's called the border search exception. Like it or not, it's been upheld by the Supreme and federal courts.
    5. Re:Not enitrely true... by crazytisay · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US decided a long time ago that the protection of its borders outweighed the protections of the constitution. See this for a nice summary:

      http://law.onecle.com/constitution/amendment-04/18-border-searches.html

      When customs searches your bags for contraband, it is basically the same as when they search your laptop. The problem is that we tend to store much more personal, professional, or confidential information on our computers than we would ever carry around in our luggage (mostly because you know ahead of time someone will see it). I mean when was the last time you took your vibrator with you to a foreign country? It seems so much more invasive simply because of the context. Now, unless you are demanding an end to all searches at the border (which will never happen for obvious reasons) I suggest you move on to how to get around it.

      As far as solutions go, I like the idea of dual booting if its your only option, but I have 3 laptops. I can always take one with nothing on it for use on the trip and check my flashdrive with the luggage. Once they start demanding the contents of the flashdrives, it will have to be remote access only.

      Good luck :)

  3. Re:Dual Boot by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If they choose to store the contents of your hard drive for later analysis, not at all. Nor will it protect you against minimally-clever forensics tools.

    It depends on what, in particular, you're concerned about. As far as I know, they don't currently routinely search laptops, so it'd be speculation to guess at what a routine search they don't do would miss.

  4. Yes it will work. by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is what TrueCrypt is for (but don't encrypt the entire drive). Just encrypt what needs encryptin'. Set up an encrypted volume with a shadow volume inside a regular file. Call it something that looks like a system file like MSDOS.SYS or DBLSPACE.BIN or something. (That would explain the unusually large size of the file.)

    So first, they would have to know you even have something encrypted (which is just a guess if they see TrueCrypt installed). Then they'd have to know what/which files was/were encrypted (which can't be determined by examining the file). Then they'd have to ask you to mount the volume and provide the password (at which time you then provide the shadow volume password, which only contains innocuous files).

    I can't be the only dummy to figure that out.

    --
    "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
  5. Depends upon how proficient they are. by khasim · · Score: 4, Informative

    They can also image your drive. As Bruce says, the easiest way to avoid this is to not have your data on your laptop. Put it on something else.

  6. Re:Dual Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yup. Set the GRUB timeout to 0; you can only boot Linux iff you hold escape.

  7. Imagine the pre-computer days... by Boron55 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Imagine the pre-computer days, when the customs could stop you, do a naked search and go through all your papers without any passwords. What could you do at that time? Just do not take the sensitive papers with you or mail them with certified mail.

    I think there is no difference now. Email your files and do not put them on your laptop. That is what TFA is basically saying too.

    So, IMHO, complains here won't work. The only problem that travelers have with laptop/cellphone search is inconvenience (since everybody is used to store all your files on your hard drive), but otherwise it is not any bit less legal than it was before the laptop era. And inconvenience is not any concern for authorities at all. So consider your laptop to be your briefcase and just not put any documents there that you don't want custom officers to see. End of story.

  8. Re:Dual Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Works very well. I had to set this up due to being detained at the border for several hours because they didn't know linux. They keep the laptop, computer plus some external drives and let me go. Still working on getting them back, hence anonymously. Bought a new laptop after that, set up the dual-boot with short times to select something other then windows and no log-in required. Been inspected several times after that with no problems.

  9. US Customs has always been like this by querist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having returned from my second trip to China, I still find it amazing that it is easier for me, as a foreigner, to enter China than it is for me, as a US citizen (born a US citizen to parents who were US citizens, etc.) to enter the US after a trip abroad.

    I just pretty much walked right through in China - I handed them the entry form (one half of the two part form - the other half you give them when you leave) and they waved me through. Customs in China did not even ask to see my laptop, never mind read files or anything like that.

    On returning to the US at Detroit International, I was given the 3rd degree by US Customs agents, and I'm a US Citizen. "How long were you in China?" (as if he couldn't tell by the side-by side entry/departure stamps in my passport) "What were you doing there?" (visiting friends) "What do these friends do for a living?" (A couple of college professors and a financial analyst)

    This happened on both of my trips.

    And I noticed that they were doing this to EVERYONE, not just me. (The plane had several hundred people on it.) I'd hate to see what they were doing to Chinese citizens entering the US.

    I hope they realize that they are going to scare businesses away from the US if they keep this up.

    I find it somewhat ironic that the captcha for this post is "undergo".

    1. Re:US Customs has always been like this by Dionysus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't have any problems flying into SFO or Chicago last times I went through those airports. Then again, I was on a student visa at the time.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
  10. Re:A naive suggestion by rcamans · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could probably load all your work on a usb drive? then have a clean laptop, and slide thru?

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  11. Addendum:US Customs has always been like this by querist · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just to spare the speculation, etc: I'm caucasian, of Western European descent, so no, I don't look "Middleastern" or "Asian" or anything else. Just your typical "white male".

  12. Re:Refuse you entry to the contry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can customs officials refuse entry to an American Citizen? Can they banish me for refusing to divulge my password? They cannot. They can only detain you "for a reasonable period of time" while they investigate what you may be carrying, but they have to justify the length of detention by some reasonable suspicion. i.e. we suspect he swallowed drugs and so can take 3 days to see what comes out the other end. But they need to back that up with why they suspect that.

    Or another example is detain you and/or the computer until they can image the drive.
    And they can confiscate contraband (your definition may vary).
    Ultimately, you have the right to enter the country.
  13. Re:Refuse you entry to the contry by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think the issue is whether or not an American citizen might be "banished from the country" upon making a return trip. I'd say, no, they're NOT able to do that.

    The problem is, they could confiscate your expensive computer gear, and there's no guarantee you'd ever get it back. (There seems to be no real statute of limitations on the time these people are allowed to take to "examine" your property, if they claim a potential "security risk".)

  14. Re:embolden? by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's cromulent.

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  15. Re:Dual Boot by quentin_quayle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Set up a Windows partition and a Linux partition, set it to boot to Windows by default, keep all your data on the Linux partition. How well would that work, I wonder.

    Better: set up dual boot, and hide lilo or grub. Have it wait for a moment between BIOS and default OS, and if you press a certain F key combination it shows the choice; otherwise it goes right into innocent, typical-seeming Windows installation.

    You'd still be subject to either having to unencrypt your real data or having the notebook confiscated if you refuse, if this is discovered - but if they don't know to look at the disk display applet in Windows, it's unlikely to be discovered. And you can disable that applet.

  16. Truecrypt + Thumbdrive = Hidden OS by Gregoyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a couple of ways to hide your data; one is to have two Truecrypt volumes, one hidden and one standard. This is easy, but it still lets the customs agent know you are using Truecrypt. This may not be a problem in the US (right now) but what about other countries where simply knowing about a program like Truecrypt could look suspicious?

    This post on the Truecrypt forums describes a way to install two OSes, one for show, and one hidden. Unless there is a Truecrypt rescue CD or bootable USB thumbdrive inserted the system will boot to a normal Windows desktop. This method would hold up to any casual sort of inspection, such as those customs agents carry out dozens of times per day. There are a couple of traces that would need to be removed in order to actually have "plausible deniability", but to me not having the questions asked in the first place is preferable to being able to deny one of the potential answers.

    It's sad that you might need to do things like this, but there are often technological solutions to social problems.

    --

    "He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil."

  17. Re:Dual Boot by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Informative
    If they choose to store the contents of your hard drive for later analysis, not at all. Nor will it protect you against minimally-clever forensics tools.

    of course there's always deniable encryption, ie rubberhose.

  18. Re:Mess with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Newflash Einstein -- tin foil hats *amplify* signals emitted from your brain.

    More likely they monitor channels to figure out what most people believe their rights are and how to activly incite the maximum amount of FUD so that when they play word games with you and ask you to do something you have every right to refuse you will do it without question.

    Now move along quietly and put your tin foil hat back on.

  19. Re:Mess with them by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reference

    Note that this study fails to consider whether the shiny side goes on the outside or the inside, and also does not explore the use of true tin foil as opposed to aluminum foil.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  20. Re:Corporation Lawyers by goaliemn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately, you won't have that luxury. No matter what country you're going into, they can do this and you don't get a phone call. They'll sieze your laptop and you'll have no other options. If you smash it, you'll probably get arrested for interfering with an investigation, or the work of an officer. IF you throw it in the trash, they'll collect it and get what they want.

    If the IP on your laptop is worth that much, you shouldn't be carrying it outside of the country on a laptop. I worked at a company that prohibited us from carrying certain information on our laptops to some middle eastern countries, as they were known for seizing/replicating hard drives from employees in certain industries.

    If anything, you may face legal issues from your employer if you're taking that valuable of information out of the country.

  21. Re:Dual Boot by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Set grub timeout to 0 with default to windows. When you want to go into Linux, bypass the timeout by holding escape.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  22. Re:Make it not boot by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Should have been clearer. Flying to Toronto to Buffalo; so it was effectively entering the US. US Customs are on site in Toronto Canada.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  23. Re:Dual Boot by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Being detained by customs does not give you a criminal record. If you're a non-citizen, it may indeed cause trouble in entering the country again. To get a criminal record, you must be tried and convicted of a crime.

    While all of that is true, nowadays being put on the "naughty list", or having a name like someone on the naughty list, or being brown-skinned is enough to effectively punish you as much as if you'd been convicted.

    There has been a Canadian citizen in Sudan who has (had?) been trapped there because, while he had never been charged with anything, he had been suspected of doing something. He got trapped, and could come home due to being on the no-fly list. Basically, years in legal limbo.

    I wouldn't assume getting detained by customs wouldn't necessarily cause you problems. When your name ends up on the unpublished, unfixable, or secret lists of people they don't want to fly ... it's as good as if you'd been convicted.

    Do you really want to find out the limits of where your theoretical rights end and where your abridged, post 9-11 rights end?

    Cheers
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  24. Holy Shit! by hassanchop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not according to the Fourth Amendment to the US constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...


    That's amazing, you'd better get that info to the 9th circuit (where the decision was made), I can't believe they'd overlook something like that... /sarcasm

    Maybe someone can explain why the act of entering the country nullifies my constitutional rights.


    Have you read the judgment? That might be a good place to start.

  25. Need One of These by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Put all your important data on one of these - or better yet, don't rip the cable up - leave it alone so it looks like any other cable.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  26. Re:Dual Boot by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Informative

    That and I know some decent degree of people encrypt their porn anyways (on their home computers - most people stupid enough to download porn at work aren't going to be smart enough to hide it). For the married guys, it keeps the wife from seeing it or the kids from stumbling across it if they're playing on the computer.

    In my own case, I encrypt it (using Truecrypt - awesomest OSS program I've found in a long time) because while my family knows I keep porn on my computer, if I ever have a random car accident or something I don't want them to see exactly HOW MUCH I have on the system once they start looking through my files ;). Heck Truecrypt can even store an encrypted volume on an unformatted unpartitioned chunk of hard drive. There's little way they can prove that that's anything other than some space you haven't allocated yet.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  27. Re:Dual Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    trucrypt has a dual password feature with a hidden encryption sector in the main sector. Give the border inquisitor the primary password that unlocks your grandmothers receipe collection - truecrypt claims it's impossible to determine if a second password to a hidden volume exists - the hidden volume is stored in seemingly random data.

    or wear more tinfoil, i hear that protects against multiple vectors.

  28. Re:Dual Boot by xtracto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sounds like a small price to pay in order to protect my right to liberty. Just because the government demands access does not mean I have to comply.

    Except that you do not have such liberty while going through customs. And that is not a special thing of the USA customs. Almost every country usually has this rule where some of your basic privacy rights get removed while you are entering a country.

    Remember, it was *your* choice to enter such country (either by booking a flight directly or a flight with a stop in such a country). Therefore, you must fully comply with its legislation.

    That is one of the reasons I refuse to fly through the USA (even if the flight prices are around $600 usd instead of $1100... I choose not to get my ass probed in order to obtain a USA visa (even a transit visa)

    Of course as I said before, such behaviour is not exclusive of the USA, therefore I think it is really smart to do what the article suggests.

    I prefer a different approach however. I usually put all my data in a secure server connected to the internet and just travel with my "barebones" laptop (with only Windows or Linux installed and whatever software I must use).

    When I am at my destination, I connect to the server and retrieve my files. As the author of the article says. Customs can not read what is not there.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  29. Re:Yup by agwadude · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm as libertarian free-rights paranoid as the next slashdotter (while not quite), but a healthy dose of history here. Customs, border crossings, etc. have never had anything to do with democratic values

    Completely incorrect. Many of the British actions to diminish liberty in the 1700s were directly related to enforcing customs and duties: writs of assistance, vice-admiralty courts, etc. The Founding Fathers were reacting in part against British regulation of customs and duties so many of the "democratic values" like the 4th Amendment, the requirement that trials be held in the locality where the crime was committed, etc, were in fact developed in response to customs enforcement.

    The most poignant example is writs of assistance. These were open-ended search warrants that authorized the holder to conduct any search whatsoever and were issued to British customs officers in the colonies to catch smugglers. They outraged the colonists, who saw them as an affront to their liberty, and directly led to the requirement for specific search warrants in the early state constitutions and later in the 4th Amendment.

    I find it most ironic that the restrictions on search warrants came in response to arbitrary customs enforcement by British customs officers, but today no restrictions at all apply to searches by American customs officers. Whatever court ruled that the 4th Amendment doesn't apply to border crossings ignored significant precedence to the contrary.

    See Writ of Assistance in Wikipedia for a pretty decent overview.

  30. Re:Dual Boot by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find the contrast sad... when I recently flew into Amsterdam, I grabbed my bag, the guy stamped my passport, and I walked through a door out into the real world. No questions, no forms, no inspections, no going through my bags. And this while I'm coming from the "land of the free" to one of those wacky socialist European countries.


    Well, to be fair, this is the exact same treatment I've had every time I've re-entered the U.S. (as a U.S. citizen). It's usually always via Boston Logan, and a few times when I arrived in the evening there weren't even any Customs officers working the Citizen's lane. You could have walked through there with a 2,000-pound bomb on a hand truck and I don't think anyone would have noticed. (Which was good, because I was pretty sure I was over my liquor quota...)

    There usually is someone working Immigration (which is distinct from Customs -- Immigration is where you get your passport checked, Customs is the luggage business) but even that was just a bored, cursory lookover.

    I'm not minimizing the seriousness of these inspections (I can't get my mind around how they're possibly constitutional, at least when applied to Citizens), but in practice I think you have to be doing something that attracts attention before you become a target. U.S. Customs is still largely a joke, at least if you make a modicum of effort to look like an upstanding citizen. Which is ironic, because I assume smugglers/terrorists would at least bother to do that.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  31. "Good faith" by marxmarv · · Score: 2, Informative

    Law enforcement has "good faith" exceptions to just about every rule in the book. Besides that, the AAs need the lawyers and guns on their side to ensure a predictable market for bubblegum teen music. Would you give that up for one shot at a paltry $222k?

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  32. Re:Dual Boot by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1, Informative

    You want "if" and not "iff." "Iff" is if and only if, but you already have the "only."

    --
    Not a sentence!
  33. Actually, the do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    And I know a few there. They were TOTAL idiots when I worked them. I have every reason to believe they remain in the same position. In fact, DHS is probably the dept, where the major qualifier for getting in, was belonging to the republican party.

  34. Re:Dual Boot by vidarh · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've had the same experience with customs in 15+ trips to the US (Washington Dulles and San Francisco) - I've never once been even asked a single question in customs.

    In immigration it's a little bit more annoying, but they've only ever asked fairly simple questions, even when I last year arrived for the 10th or 11th time in less than 18 months.

  35. Socialism and freedom by LandOfConfu$ion · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm coming from the "land of the free" to one of those wacky socialist European countries.

    I know it's hard for US residents brainwashed during the cold war, but socialism is not an alternative to freedom or even to democracy . Socialism is an alternative economic system and as such would be an alternative to capitalism .

  36. Interesting NY Times article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    NY Times had an interesting article on problems entering the US which I thought was a real eye-opener:

    He was a carefree Italian with a recent law degree from a Roman university. She was "a totally Virginia girl," as she puts it, raised across the road from George Washington's home. [snip] But on April 29, when Mr. Salerno, 35, presented his passport at Washington Dulles International Airport, a Customs and Border Protection agent refused to let him into the United States. And after hours of questioning, agents would not let him travel back to Rome, either; [snip] ...eventually learned that he had been sent in shackles to a rural Virginia jail. And there he remained for more than 10 days, locked up without charges or legal recourse... I've heard that the US government has been embarking on a tourism promotion push overseas, which have been suffering from the drop in our international reputation. Economically, it shouldn't be a challenge with the current favorable currency exchange rates (that is, the crashing US dollar). However, I imagine something like this could put a damper on your vacation, however.
  37. Re:Dual Boot by Hyppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, they want the best diploma mill degrees money can buy

  38. Re:Dual Boot by mibus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or have something that would plausibly be worth protecting. I'm sure you could find plenty of specs or requirements documents that aren't sensitive at all, for example, but that you could believably claim are terribly valuable trade secrets.


    Or you could show your stash of pr0n that you've encrypted so your partner doesn't find out ;)
  39. Re:Dual Boot by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, not an American. So I DON'T have the right to US due process.

    Actually, you do:

    U.S. Constitution, Amendment V:

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Note that the bolded word is not "citizen!"

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  40. Re:Suspiciously unsuspicious by Jozef+Nagy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry, but truecrypt volumes have no header....

    Sorry, but TC volumes DO have a header. If you read through the documentation there's a section on backups. In it it states that you should backup your volume headers. Heck, even the GUI in KDE Linux for TC has an option to export or import a volume header.

    Here's the link to the documentation on backing up volume headers: http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=backing-up-volumes-and-headers