Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft and OLPC Agree To Put XP On the XO Laptop

Apro+im points out a NYTimes report which states that Microsoft and the OLPC project have officially agreed to put Windows XP on the XO laptop. While Microsoft has been working toward this for some time, analysts began to think a deal was more likely after Walter Bender resigned from the project and was replaced by Charles Kane. Former OLPC security developer Ivan Krstic had a lot to say about Windows on the XO as well. From the Times: "Windows will add a bit to the price of the machines, about $3, the licensing fee Microsoft charges to some developing nations under a program called Unlimited Potential. For those nations that want dual-boot models, running both Windows and Linux, the extra hardware required will add another $7 or so to the cost of the machines, Mr. Negroponte said. The project's agreement with Microsoft involves no payment by the software giant, and Microsoft will not join One Laptop Per Child's board. 'We've stayed very pure,' Mr. Negroponte said.

4 of 530 comments (clear)

  1. "extra hardware"? by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those nations that want dual-boot models, running both Windows and Linux, the extra hardware required will add another $7 or so to the cost of the machines

    Why does dual boot require extra hardware??

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  2. Pure? by the_brobdingnagian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'We've stayed very pure,' Mr. Negroponte said. Yet from their core principles:

    There is no inherent external dependency in being able to localize software into their language, fix the software to remove bugs, and repurpose the software to fit their needs. Nor is there any restriction in regard to redistribution; OLPC cannot know and should not control how the tools we create will be re-purposed in the future. And they seem to have adapted their "core principles" to be more positive towards closed source. A real shame is you ask me. source: Core Principles (Renamed to "Five principles" instead of "Core principles" as the seem to value their principles less and less).
  3. Re:Give it to them for free by kernowyon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    NotBornYesterday said -

    I can honestly say that I don't think that Microsoft as a company is concerned about these kids' education
    If you read the blog by Ivan Krstic in the submission, it would seem that Nicholas Negroponte isn't too bothered about education when compared to shifting the OLPCs -

    Nicholas told me -- and not just me -- that learning was never part of the mission. The mission was, in his mind, always getting as many laptops as possible out there
    It is a huge shame that the OLPC project has deteriorated in this way. When first announced,I was really keen on getting hold of one of these machines to see what I could do to help. I downloaded the .iso of the Sugar GUI and ran it in a VM - very clunky in the VM, but you could see the potential. Others I demonstrated it to were equally impressed. Now it seems to be floundering desperately and the Microsoft sharks are closing in for the kill.
    --
    Awful UID - but I have been here ages...
  4. Re:Give it to them for free by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Microsoft is doing this because people actually want their software.

    That's why they had to bribe the Libyan Ministry of Man Power with a huge training contract to get them to switch from OLPC to Classmates.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."