Slashdot Mirror


Fermilab Calls For Code Crackers

atrocious cowpat passes along a call for help from symmetry magazine, the joint publication of Fermilab and SLAC, noting: "Could be just plain gibberish, it could be something like those wonderfully weird letters to the Mount Wilson observatory, or it could be a message from aliens who just happened to have gotten their hands (tentacles/exoskeleton) on a fax machine." "A little over a year ago, the Fermilab Office of Public Affairs received a curious letter in code (4.4-MB image here). It has been sitting in our files all that time and we haven't had much of a chance to look into breaking the code, nor are we particularly expert at this!"

61 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. Clearly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's Dr. Emma Russells formula for cold fusion.

    1. Re:Clearly.. by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it's Digital Fortress.

      Fortunately, the Slashdot Hive Mind has a safety shutdown when the story rolls off the front page.

  2. Well obviously... by clonan · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Roswel aliens that were stranded on earth brainwashed some NEC employees who planted the code in all fax machines to send the fax to fermilabs who then posts it on the internet (which would be invented in 40 years) and thereby transmitted to mars...

    Makes perfect sense!

  3. I'm not positive about my translation by Eevee · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it seems he's from Nigeria and wants help tranferring money out of the country.

    1. Re:I'm not positive about my translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And he wants you to "Drink More Ovaltine"

    2. Re:I'm not positive about my translation by Hinhule · · Score: 4, Funny

      Really?
      I got an "ASCII" version of goatse :-/

    3. Re:I'm not positive about my translation by spazdor · · Score: 3, Funny

      me too! And apparently we suxor?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    4. Re:I'm not positive about my translation by sveard · · Score: 3, Funny

      But why do they call it Ovaltine? The mug is round. The jar is round. They should call it round tine.

    5. Re:I'm not positive about my translation by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative

      >But why do they call it Ovaltine?

      Because it is made from eggs.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  4. Well, obvious stuff: by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Three "stanzas" maybe.

    Starting with the "middle" stanza, that appears to be some sort of "key" perhaps. Each of the different symbols correspond to a different hexadecimal digit.

    In the first stanza, each grouping of lines has 1, 2 or 3 lines.

    In the last stanza, each group of lines is only 1 or 2 lines.

    Maybe the last stanza is binary?

    And maybe the first stanza is base 3?

    Anyone else care to wager a guess?

    1. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by spydum · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed, first grouping is probably base-3, 2nd is key with the index being hex, and 3rd grouping is base-2.. and if I convert it out.. it ends up drawing an image of the goatse.cx guy... damnit!

    2. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mirror here. I think Google's servers can probably handle the traffic. ;)

    3. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by azzuth · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny, when i converted it and then etch it onto a vinyl i got Rick Roll'd

    4. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another possibility: a blank represents a 0, a mark indicates a 1, giving us binary. This fits better with the hex in the middle of the page, since three binary go into one hex. The symbols don't make any sense, however, so if that's a key, then it's going to just translate it into another code.

      If I weren't at work, I would try translating the hash marks into their hex equivalent, storing that, then translating the hex to the symbols that were given and storing that separately. The symbols may mean something to someone other than me (some of them look hebrew, but some of them definitely aren't; perhaps astrology symbols or something else?), or it may be that the key in the middle is a red herring and that the hex itself codes for something (ascii being the most likely generally, although a quick glance seems to indicate that some of them would code for non-display characters).

      Most likely a hoax all things considered. A (accidentally?) clever hoax, considering the hex in the middle and the many interpretations of the vertical lines, but most likely a hoax nonetheless.

    5. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by azzuth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone else notice there are 8 digits if we break it into binary verticaly? such as from top to bottom left to right the first being 10100111 and alternatively bottom to top (as if the page were rotated 90 degrees clockwise) 11100101...

      The Binary can then be converted to Hex and then perhaps deciphered...

      Working on it atm..

    6. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by Fantome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My transcription of the first block:
      32323333 1112132
      33323132 212331
      21113311 32312233
      33321212 3213113
      31133331 3331111
      21133332 3232211
      23231333 1121231
      33231312

      My transcription of the second block:
      11121211 21212121 21121212 12111212 1121
      11211211 21211121 21121112 12112111 21111
      11112121 21121121 21112121 21211121 11211
      21112121 12112111 21112111 21112111 21112
      11121121 11211121 21121112 12221112 1211
      12121121 11211121 11211211 12121211 12111
      21121121 11211211 12112111 21211211 1212
      11212121 1

      Any see errors in this (parts were hard to read).

    7. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by baffled · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're thinking waaay too deep.

      Turn the page 90 degrees clockwise.

      It says 'Hi'

    8. Re:Well, obvious stuff: by funaho · · Score: 4, Funny

      The world's first rickroll-by-fax?

  5. The dots by personalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My question is: Are the tiny dots in the background a dirty fax or photocopier artifact or are they, in fact, the code.

  6. Google recruiting? by spydum · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps Google is targeting Fermilab scientists for hiring.. Don't they have a history of using strange riddles and puzzles for hiring purposes?

    1. Re:Google recruiting? by BigJClark · · Score: 4, Interesting


      EA posted billboards all over Vancouver, BC awhile, that had char *msg[] = { "10", "43", "14" } (not real values) and essentially it was the ascii decimal equivilant of "Now Hiring".

      I thought that was pretty trick.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    2. Re:Google recruiting? by snaFu07 · · Score: 4, Informative
  7. Hmmm... by Omicron32 · · Score: 5, Funny

    4.4MB image link on the front page of Slashdot? I sense a great disturbance in the force...

    1. Re:Hmmm... by mapkinase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, right now I do not sense no nothing except "Loading..."

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 3, Funny

      For the price of 100 gold, I will identify this cryptic item.

  8. Interesting... by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 5, Funny
    Very odd indeed! I received this cryptic message (which it seems I've seen before):

    Error!
    Could not connect to remote server

    You tried to access the address http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fnalcodeletter.jpg, which is currently unavailable. Please make sure that the Web address (URL) is correctly spelled and punctuated, then try reloading the page.
  9. Re:WTF slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I clicked on this article and a popup advertisement came up. What the hell?? Means you started Internet Explorer instead of your usual browser. WTF were you thinking?

  10. Mathamatically speaking.... by hengdi · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are 113 symbols, each of which is either 1, 2 or 3 strokes. So it is essentially a 113 digit base 3 number.

    This limits the amount of information that the message is trying to pass.

    For example, using base 26 - all the letters - means we could convey the same information in ??? digits.

    Oh damn it. I'm too drunk and Google ain't working for me. Perhaps someone could give a value for ???

    But I'm betting it won't be very many digits. I.e. this message is very short.

    1. Re:Mathamatically speaking.... by whitneyw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering that the ticks are vertically aligned, I would consider the interstitial spaces important parts of the message. Also note that the top block contains no more than three ticks consecutively, while the bottom block contains no more than two. Neither contain consecutive spaces, and both appear to start with a tick (not a space).

      Part of it bears a striking resemblance to UPC code for "8200019288".

    2. Re:Mathamatically speaking.... by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jose Cuervo Especial, 750 ml, 12-pack case.

      Mystery solved!

      Damn, Google has us spoiled.

    3. Re:Mathamatically speaking.... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The interstices would not represent zeroes, unless the message just happened to have no more than 1 zero in a row. Hence | represents 0, || represents 1, and ||| represents 2, or some rotation of that.

      By the way, this is apparently some kind of "unary" notation, though what zero it is remains to be seen. Similarly, the bottom set, having no more than two | in a row, might be another unary notation of something in a base 2.

      As for the little dots, some, like the symbol for E, are repeated, so it's safe to assume they're part of the symbol. Others, like 6, are repeated without the dots, so it's probably a stray mark. Still others, like 5, 0, and 8 are not repeated, so we can't tell for sure whether the odd marks are stray or part of the symbol.

      It's also possible they are an additional notation applied to the base symbol, giving it a slightly different meaning, or adding more info.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  11. It's a trap! by Mortiss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Crackers do not fall for this trap. It is an obvious attempt to spread the Snow Crash!

  12. Strange... by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems to be some sort of construction/zoning notice. Something about a hyperspace-bypass being put in...

    Cheers!

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  13. Okay, let's do this! by The+Insane+One · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just let me get a pencil and some paper.

    "All your base are belo"

    Oh crap.

  14. I've seen this before by Crash+McBang · · Score: 5, Funny

    The translation comes out as:

    My name is Kosh Naranek.

    I am writing this brief letter to bring to your attention a business offer which we believe you might find attractive.
    Mrs Maria Garibaldi; wife of one a wealthy Martian executive (Late Mr. Michael Garibaldi) seeks a business assistance from a reliable and reputable businessman to invest and manage funds to the tune of 15 Million Credits...

    --
    To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
  15. Source? by aleph42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any hint on the source, or at least why they consider it important?

    Not to be harsh, but if I send some random code letter to some lab, I guess (hope) it won't make the news, even on slashdot.

    --
    Don't take my posts literally; it's just code to control my botnet.
  16. Re:It says "Welcome to the Slashdot effect." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try this link:

    http://filebin.ca/skpzc/fnalcodeletter.jpg

  17. Mirrored Copy by LaptopZZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I mirrored it on my server as well as made a scaled down version which is just as readable as the original (unless you're making a poster).

    http://www.pixabug.com/aliens/fnalcodeletter.jpg

    http://www.pixabug.com/aliens/fnalcodeletter_sanesize.jpg

    Happy Cracking

    --
    -=LaptopZZ=-
  18. I've managed to decipher the final section... by DirtySouthAfrican · · Score: 5, Funny

    It reads "Use only Genuine Interocitor Parts". Seems gibberish to me.

  19. I've seen this before.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's obviously Woodstock. He's telling Snoopy about encryption.

  20. I think it says... by Uncle+Focker · · Score: 4, Funny

    'PC Load Letter'? What the fuck does that mean?

  21. the strokes are music (?) by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 3, Funny
    To me, the strokes look like a clapping pattern. I sat and clapped it out at my desk here, and if done at a fairly brisk pace, the top section is an interesting and often asymmetric rhythm.

    Parts of it clap out to sound like "apocalypse in 9/8, (co-starring the delicious talents of Gabble Ratchet)" by Genesis from Foxtrot

    But the whole thing is scattered enough that it comes out like more of a one handed improv or approximation of Steve Reich's "Clapping Music".

    The bottom section is less rhythmically active, but sounds more "even", kind of "rock and roll" ish.

    The middle part is a dull cipher, similar to Nugsoth.

    That's all I've got.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  22. B E S... by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    U R E T O D R I N K Y O U R O V A L T I N E

    --
    "Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!"

    Everyone's a critic.

  23. Context? by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To be able to decrypt a message it is usually necessary to know the context to where it belongs. Without context it's hard.

    And is it really a message, it can be other things too:

    1. A data sampling done by hand with two samplings, the first has three alternatives the second has two. The code in the middle is just thrown in for good measure by a joker.
    2. It's someone's way to compose music. The first part is for a simple instrument with three tones, the last part is another instrument with two alternatives (bongo drums?). The middle part is just markers used to remind the performers about what to sing.
    3. Someone's idea of a prank to pull.
    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Context? by Garridan · · Score: 4, Funny

      All this reminds me of my algebra prof's (apparently) favorite poem: "One-one was a racehorse, and One-two was one too. One-one won one race, and One-two won one too."

  24. Re:The raw numbers by Iamthecheese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I change the 1s to 0 and the 2s to 1, I get some interesting bits.
    "J)IEQ)"""$curren;\QHquot;$)T

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  25. Re:Not Cheere.. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 3, Funny

    But rather, "So long and thanks for all the fish".

  26. Coral cache by irae · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's coral cache version, works for me fine. Link provided by slashdotter, firefox plugin.

  27. I'm pretty sure it's for my broken office light by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a tempo guide for the person who's messing with the fluorescent ceiling light in the corner of my office. I swear the light is flickering to the same cadence as the tick marks on the page.

  28. DNA sequence? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Four DNA characters: A, C, G, T
    2. Four character sequences: |, ||, |||, (space)
    3. Determine character mapping.
    4. ...
    5. Velociraptor.
    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  29. Digitized by panthro · · Score: 3, Informative

    323233331112132
    33323132212331
    2111331132312233
    333212123213113
    311333313331111
    211333323232211
    232313331121231
    33231312

    f0be58f2fd63
    6c79d2e493e6

    S f c

    111212112121212121121212121112121121
    1121121121211121211211121211211121111
    1111212121121121211121212121112111211
    2111212112112111211121112111211121112
    111211211121112121121112122211121211
    1212112111211121112112111212121112111
    211211211121121112112111212112111212
    112121211

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  30. Re:4th stanza by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    What a coincidence! That happens to be the combination to my luggage!

    Sorry, had to do it. :-D

  31. Real problem solvers comment here by Jhan · · Score: 4, Informative
    (trying to move the interesting stuff to the top) The top and bottom part of the code code the same data. The little indentation at the beginning of the line is important and means that the previous line continues. The indentation in the bottom bottom part is of, perhaps because of writing conditions. The top part consists of five trinary numbers of lengths 29, 46, 14, 14, 8 digits. The bottom part consists of five binary numbers of lengths 75, 110, 37, 36, 8 digits. My best transcription, probably with errors:

    char trinary[8][40]={
    "323233331112132", // 15
    "33323132212331", // 14 29
    "2111331132312233", // 16
    "333212123213113", // 15
    "311333313331111", // 15 46
    "211333323232211", // 14 14
    "232313331121231", // 14 14
    "33231312"}; // 8 8
    char binary[8][40]={
    "111010110101010101101010101110101101", // 36
    "1101101101011101011011101011011101111", // 37 75
    "1111010101101101011101010101110111011", // 37
    "0111010110110111011101110111011101110", // 37
    "111011011101110101101110100011101011", // 36 110
    // Should have been more clearly to the left?
    "1010110111011101110110111010101110111", // 37 37
    // Should have been two steps to the left?
    "011011011101101110110111010110111010", // 36
    "110101011"};
    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    1. Re:Real problem solvers comment here by bodan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not a critique as such and only vaguely on topic: Does anyone else find it interesting that parent found it natural to represent ternary using 1-2-3 and binary using 0-1?

      That was actually my first instinct too when I was "reading" the thing...

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    2. Re:Real problem solvers comment here by ThreeGigs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The first and last parts *DO NOT* look like terniary and binary to me.

      Instead, they look like an RLL encoded pattern, similar to what you'd see on a hard drive. Maybe NRZI.

      In fact, the first looks surprisingly like (1,3) MFM RLL.
      Also reminds me of the old Apple Floppy drive "between any two ones there can only be a maximum of one zero" data writing rule.

    3. Re:Real problem solvers comment here by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We've mostly solved it further down the thread. The top section is in ternary (with 0 replaced by |||), 000-space, 001->a, 002->b, etc. It's strangely wrapped: the spaces and non-spaces at the beginnings and ends of lines count. It says "FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CALL THIS NOISE".

      The second part we haven't deciphered yet. It's possible that we'd need a Fermilab insider for this.

      The third part is RLL. Once you decode the RLL (number of | between consecutive ||), you get the same code as part one, which says "EMPLOYEE NUMBER BASSE SIXTEEN", or so I've been told. This suggests that at least one part of the puzzle requires help from Fermilab people.

      My uninformed guess is that once we solve the middle section, we'll get someone's name. His or her employee number at Fermilab spells something out in base 16, a coincidence which Frank Shoemaker would call "noise". Another possibility is that the middle section is hex-encoded employee ID numbers, which would mean that we can't solve it.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  32. All your base... by marcus · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...are belong to us.

    Even I can see that.

    Obviously, these Fermilab folks don't get to go outside at all.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  33. writing tendencies and charset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    while it may not be terribly relevant to the solution, it's worth noting a few oddities about the author's writing style. first of all, the second set of vertical lines is likely to be read right to left. notice how well justified the right side of the message is, while the left side terminates at various locations. we also know he writes the individual clusters from left to right based on the strokes left at the bottom of the bars.

    secondly, i assume the author is writing with a felt tip pen and is transcribing this from another source. notice how some bars will have a larger dot at one end or the other. i postulate that the author has set down his pen and is checking another sheet to determine what to write, while his felt pen bleeds a little too much ink onto the paper. this, however, doesn't happen with a ball point pen. perhaps this will be of assistance in determining the order strokes were written in, giving us some insight into the author's intent.

    thirdly, notice that the author writes the number 0 with a slash through it, but not the number 7 with a dash through it. i'm not an expert on handwriting identification, but certain groups will often be more keen on the selection of particular stylistic numbers, so this may help us to understand something of the author's background.

    finally, note that many of the chars used in the second section are letters from other char sets. the letter i is obvious to the english readers, but less apparent is the instance of one that looks suspiciously like a greek capital phi. also, several bear a striking resemblance to chars that appear in a masonic cypher alphabet. http://www.odr.org/anonymous/fam-code.htm can the other chars be identified as belonging to specific alphabets?

  34. FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CALL THIS NOISE by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first part is ternary, with 3 substituted for 0. It's somewhat miswrapped, but it appears to say "FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CALL THIS NOISE".

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    1. Re:FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CALL THIS NOISE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's true:
      remove the linebreaks from the first block, interpret # of lines as trinary digits 0,1,2 (|->0, ||->1, |||->2) and you get

      212 122 220 001 021
      222 120 211 012 201
      000 220 021 201 122
      222 101 012 102 002
      200 222 202 220 002
      002 222 121 211 022
      120 222 001 012 022
      120 201

      Converting to alphabet by 000->a, 001->b, ... , 221->z, 222->' ', we get:

      xrybh pwftayhtr kflcs uycc qwip bfipt

      Write a script to check possible letter substituions against a dictionary, and you find that the substitution cipher
      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
      nl  o ki wu   strdec hfa

      converts this to "frank shoemaker would call this noise"; maybe a coincidence, but looking likely.

    2. Re:FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CALL THIS NOISE by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Last stanza:
      consider the || separators between trinary digits |, | |, | | |; decode as for first stanza, gives:
      tadcfmtt blaztr zyppt pioqttb ->
      "employee number basse sixteen"

      thus, the central numbers are probably the employee # of the prank letter writer. Someone at Fermilab could probably check this (maybe Frank Shoemaker?)

      I think we've solved it!