Slashdot Mirror


Honeywell & Airbus To Turn Algae Into Jet Fuel

mystermarque alerts us to an announcement by Honeywell, JetBlue Airways, International Aero Engines, and Airbus about a program to develop jet fuel from algae and other biomass. They hope to supply nearly 1/3 of the demand for jet fuel from these sources by 2030. A Wall Street Journal blog points out that even if this program's goals are met, we will be worse off by 2030 in terms of jet kerosene released into the atmosphere, assuming that the rapid growth in the aviation sector continues apace.

10 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. A blogger says it's bad... by pete_norm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Wall Street Journal blog points out that even if this program's goals are met, we will be worse off by 2030 in terms of jet kerosene released into the atmosphere, assuming that the rapid growth in the aviation sector continues apace.


    I guess we better do nothing then and abandon this project...
    1. Re:A blogger says it's bad... by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cheap fuel allows us to get cheap goods from other places (like China).

      IF you had to get all of your goods from local factories/farms, you'd pay much more for the goods themselves, and have a far smaller selection, driving the price up even more due to lack of competition.

      The inability of local retailers to provide the same goods as the "megacorps" killed them.

      to continue, local retailers means that you have to pay more for your goods which means that your standard of living will drop as the prices rise and you are not able to afford as much as you once did.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  2. Abandon this project? by WinPimp2K · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah, this is no place for half measures. We must obviously elimiminate all jet kerosene releases by 2030.

    All hands: Abandon Planet! Abandon Planet!

    Then we can nuke the site from orbit. It is the only way to make sure.

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  3. Re:I've got a secret for them by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    where does algae get its carbon?

  4. Soylent Green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure they'll tell us jet fuel is made of algae, but then we'll find out that jet fuel "is people."

    It works best with a Charlton Heston voice.

  5. Re:I've got a secret for them by Starteck81 · · Score: 5, Funny

    where does algae get its carbon?
    Ducks?
    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
  6. Re:I've got a secret for them by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    haha. anyway, the grandparent poster was talking about people with their head up their ass when that's where he stores his. taking carbon from the air to release it back again is better than what we're doing now.

  7. Re:I've got a secret for them by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry man. You really don't understand the carbon cycle.

    You should know that the majority of organic material (like leaves or algae) and the carbon they contain does not get trapped away from the atmosphere. For the most part, dead organic material slowly decays releasing that carbon back into CO2.

    Using algae as a source of fuel can decrease the amount of carbon we are pulling out of deep sequestered sources. It would decrease global CO2 concentration as the source of carbon is part of a closed loop. We'll be pulling carbon out of the air when we grow more algae.

    On another note. Electrolysis is not easy. Right now, electrolysis terribly inefficient and needs platinum electrodes. There's a reason that hydrogen today is produced by cracking oil and not extracted from water.

  8. Re:Rapid growth in the aviation sector? by analog_line · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally I don't mind much. I'm hoping we see a resurgence of train travel. Easier, cheaper, and somehow a more romantic way to travel.


    Well, I don't know where you're getting your numbers. Perhaps for short distances and certain areas (ie, up and down the Eastern Seaboard), but for cross country travel, trains aren't price competitive at all. I travel to Seattle once or twice a year from Boston, and I can still get ~$300 round trip tickets. I also get there in a few hours. I've priced out train travel, and it comes out to almost $600, and 6 solid days of travel time for the round trip. Even more if I want a guaranteed electrical socket so I can plug anything in and do work/other stuff during the 3 day journey each way (you've got to buy a room for the long distance trains, the special seats with plugs only seem to be on the trains that run along the Eastern Seaboard, that's something like $300 per CONNECTION).

    Now, I don't imagine that the cost of air travel is going to stay that low, so in the near future train travel may very well become the only reasonable option left to me, but even with the nightmare that is air travel today, it's still a better option than the train.
  9. Re:I've got a secret for them by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you dense? Where does the electricity come from for electrolysis? How are you going to transport said hydrogen? Mass transit in America? Fat chance. Americans are too ingrained with their love of cars as if their cars were more precious than family members. Put an American in almost any European city and they will start using public transport, because it is easier than dealing with a car.

    American's don't 'love' their cars. The zoning, design and construction of their homes and cities make them reliant on cars.
    --
    Evil people are out to get you.