Slashdot Mirror


Senators OK $1 Billion for Online Child Porn Fight

A bill that could allocate more than $1 billion over the next eight years to combat those who trade in child pornography has been unanimously approved by a Senate panel. "The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted to send an amended version of the Combating Child Exploitation Act, chiefly sponsored by Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), to the full slate of politicians for a vote. [...] An amendment adopted Thursday also adds new sections to the original bill that would rewrite existing child pornography laws. One section is designed to make it clear that live Webcam broadcasts of child abuse are illegal, which the bill's authors argue is an "open question." Another change is aimed at closing another perceived loophole, prohibiting digital alteration of an innocent image of a child so that sexually explicit activity is instead depicted."

5 of 529 comments (clear)

  1. Oh My, by Gat0r30y · · Score: 4, Funny

    My initial reading of the title left off the "Fight" part - anyone else?

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  2. Peter Gibbons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peter Gibbons: What would you do if you had a billion dollars?
    Senate: I'll tell you what I'd do, man: Online Child Porn Fight.
    Peter Gibbons: That's it? If you had a million dollars, you'd have an online child porn fight?
    Senate: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I were a billionaire I could hook that up, too; 'cause child porn fighters dig a dude with money.
    Peter Gibbons: Good point.

  3. Re:thought crime by nbert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given the current trend in exchange rates the government seems to be ahead ;)

  4. 4chan by DeathGod321 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't see why this is so hard, all you have to do is take down 4chan.

  5. Re:What is porn? Shes a witch? shes made of wood! by Chris+Hansen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't you have a seat right over there?