Slashdot Mirror
How Japan's Biggest BBS Keeps Things Simple
zedsville points out an article at Wired proving that plenty of people (at least in Japan) are willing to brave BBS environments without all the fancy layers to screen out spam or online provocateurs: "It's a profile of Hiroyuki Nishimura, the man behind the Japanese site 2channel. Nishimura set up the simplistic BBS in 1999, when he was an exchange student in the USA. The site has no registration or web handles or moderating, no mechanisms to filter out flames and trollish behavior, and no mechanisms to help users find the most insightful comments and topics. But this ugly, lo-res site gets about 500 million pageviews a month. Nishimura doesn't police the contents of posts to his bulletin board, which has resulted in numerous libel claims. 'I used to show up in court,' he says. 'Then one day I overslept, and nothing happened. So I stopped going.' Nishimura has lost about 50 lawsuits and owes millions of dollars in penalties, which he has no intention of paying. 'If the verdict mandates deleting things, I'll do it,' he says. 'I just haven't complied with demands to pay money. Would a cell phone carrier feel responsible when somebody receives a threatening phone call?'"
No, it is not. Futaba Channel is the forefather of 4chan. It has the domain name "2chan.net", but it is never, ever referred to as "2chan" in Japan, only "Futaba Channel".
Furthermore, not even Futaba Channel is all that much like 4chan. It doesn't have a "/b/" - it has several boards with that in the URL, but they are quite different beasts in practice. They are not named "Random" or anything like it, either, but "nijiura".
2ch is 2channel. that's the BBS in the article.
2chan is futaba. that's not the BBS in the article.
2ch has only text boards.
2chan has both text and image boards.
4chan has both text and image boards, and is based very heavily off of the concept of futaba.
Here's the deal. If he feels like not showing up at work, he doesn't get paid. If he can't pay the bills, then he will go bankrupt. However, that's not as much the case with a court order, especially in Japan.
The reasoning is that libel lawsuits require a monetary damage claim in order to go to court in Japan. The basis being that money is the only truly tangible item that can be calculated to right a wrong. Plaintiffs can add on a request for a redaction, an apology, or in the case of a news media a redaction or admission article. But that alone with no monetary claims will get you diddly squat in the courts. So the plaintiffs demand a monetary figure.
After the courts slap you with a monetary penalty (not really a penalty, it's damages), it's up to the plaintiff to collect it, not the court. True, the plaintiff can go back to court and claim that the payment isn't being made, in which case the court will tell the offender to pay up, again. In short, a waste of time. There are certainly ways to FORCE a payment (going to court and getting a court order to collect from his bank account, or auction off his personal belongings) but that is just more legal trouble. Add on to that that Nishimura probably doesn't make any money and thus doesn't have the financial power to pay in the first place, making such a court order useless anyways. (The trick is that he lives off an expense account from the company he runs. The company wasn't the defendant and the court can't order the company to pay up.)
That, on top of the big issue that the RULING itself was the important part for the plaintiff in most cases, and not the monetary compensation. Once there's a ruling, they can openly tell everyone that it WAS libel, and the courts agreed.