Slashdot Mirror


How Japan's Biggest BBS Keeps Things Simple

zedsville points out an article at Wired proving that plenty of people (at least in Japan) are willing to brave BBS environments without all the fancy layers to screen out spam or online provocateurs: "It's a profile of Hiroyuki Nishimura, the man behind the Japanese site 2channel. Nishimura set up the simplistic BBS in 1999, when he was an exchange student in the USA. The site has no registration or web handles or moderating, no mechanisms to filter out flames and trollish behavior, and no mechanisms to help users find the most insightful comments and topics. But this ugly, lo-res site gets about 500 million pageviews a month. Nishimura doesn't police the contents of posts to his bulletin board, which has resulted in numerous libel claims. 'I used to show up in court,' he says. 'Then one day I overslept, and nothing happened. So I stopped going.' Nishimura has lost about 50 lawsuits and owes millions of dollars in penalties, which he has no intention of paying. 'If the verdict mandates deleting things, I'll do it,' he says. 'I just haven't complied with demands to pay money. Would a cell phone carrier feel responsible when somebody receives a threatening phone call?'"

23 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, the irony. Please, stop, it's killing me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  2. Third Party Moderation by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think an interesting moderation system would be a third party website that has all the content submitted to the original site, but then applies some moderation system (whether staff moderators, or some public rating system, or whatever) to present a moderated view of the content. Any forms for feedback would send submissions directly back to the original website's servers, which the third party would then get along with everything else it moderates.

    How could that third party moderator be responsible for the content of the site? It's not soliciting the content or running the community. It's just reporting what others are saying.

    US law says that unmoderated Internet content confers no liability for that content on the publisher (though you might have to back that up on in some expensive, annoying court sessions if you got sued). But evidently there are other courts and laws that disagree with that policy. Maybe there's another structure that's more universally defensible.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  3. This is quite interesting actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He has put the equivalent of a black board and a box of chalk on the Internet and only erases things the court orders him to. A rather interesting and unfiltered reflection of society.

    I'd think that marketing people would be all over something like this. Want to know what people really think of companies/products/people etc. look at these blackboards and learn. Marketing data that can't be achieved in probably any other situation.

    Sure, it has a high noise level, but just the same, if there is a lot of noise surrounding the object you are studying it says something about that product/company/service/law etc.

    I like it

    1. Re:This is quite interesting actually... by Shagg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He has put the equivalent of a black board and a box of chalk on the Internet and only erases things the court orders him to. A rather interesting and unfiltered reflection of society.

      I agree, it's a revolutionary idea. Maybe he can call it "USENET".

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    2. Re:This is quite interesting actually... by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Society as a whole has accountability built right into the base. This blackboard, on the other hand, makes it possible for me to post things without anyone knowing who did it, completely free of accountability. If I had a ring of invisibility in high school, I would have hung out in the girls' locker room; since I regrettably didn't have any such jewelry, I didn't hang out in the girls' locker room.

      This is an interesting concept and there's a lot to be learned about it, but I doubt it has a lot of practical applications since it's so far removed from reality for most people.

    3. Re:This is quite interesting actually... by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wakey wakey. The site gets 500 million pageviews a month. Is that a practical application enough for you? Becoming an unforeseen new media for communication?

      And removed from reality? Dude, 2ch is very mainstream in Japan. It practically makes its own reality.

      This is where internet communication is going. Bulletin boards and imageboards where anonymity is the default and where pointless individualism is deprecated, even derided. (ever been called a namefag? well now you have, namefag.)

  4. Re:But... The REAL question is by jrronimo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2chan(nel) is the forefather to 4chan. They've diverged significantly, but each has a /b/ and about the same amount of furry/tentacle/rape content. 2chan's just Japanese.

  5. BBS? by kharchenko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was all excited to read about a BBS that's still running .. and being popular. Wow ... wait, your old-school, simplistic BBS is actually just a web site .. with tons of banners, flash and other crap. Man, I am getting old!

    1. Re:BBS? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disclaimer: this is something that I originally wrote on a BBS. So it's appropriate but not an "original for today."

      The BBS never really died. Thats a myth perpetrated by Slashdot (if ever there were a central repository for groupthink, Slashdot is it) as well as self-proclaimed pundits in the tech trade rags who are always waxing eloquent about the "next big thing." Sure – the Internet did change the world, and it continues to do so. But when it comes to people interacting with each other online, that process began when Ward Christensen and Randy Suess put their first system online in 1978, and it has continued uninterrupted since then. It moved from dialup to the Internet.

      Today, various developers are finding new and innovative ways to optimize their messaging platforms for different audiences. For example, millions of American teenagers are now BBS users: they are all subscribed to a large BBS called MySpace. Responses to this assertion which begin with the words "But MySpace isnt a BBS, its a" will be summarily ignored because they indicate that you havent given more than ten seconds of thought to the subject. Forums, chat, email doesnt all of this sound more than a little bit familiar? Even the "BBSs are from yesteryear" groupthink over at Slashdot is particularly ironic, considering that Slashdot itself is basically just a big BBS optimized for the reporting and discussion of tech news.

      You can call it a BBS, or you can call it groupware, or you can call it "social software" (the new favorite buzzword for the tech marketing dweebs). Call it whatever you want but its basically the same thing. Messaging is messaging. Its just a question of how you optimize it for your audience.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    2. Re:BBS? by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Internet however has one huge difference from the BBS's of yesteryear - it's distributed. Back in the day, BBS's were hubs of meatspace social activity as well as means of asynchronous communications. The 'net has only incompletely replaced that. The 'net is also far more anonymous, where back in the BBS days if you were an asshole or flamer on one board - you'd find yourself peremptorily banned on many other local boards. (Usually based on something not easily changed back then, your home phone number.) Etc... Etc...
       
      BBS's weren't just about messaging, they were based on providing a social space, a third place if you will. The 'net has supplanted that function but not replaced it.

  6. Re:Japan just likes it 1.0 by zedsville · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You should keep in mind that lots of people in Japan are accessing the web on their phones. I think that's why so many sites there are still very simple, without a lot of bells and whistles.

  7. Re:No I Didn't by Uncle+Focker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I proposed might be used to take all the 2channel content and present it with useful moderation Then you've eliminated the whole appeal that 2channel has to it's user base. If the users wanted a site with moderation, they wouldn't post on 2channel in the first place.
  8. Re:Japan just likes it 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Any real reason to use "keitai" other than some nerd Japan fetish?

  9. Re:But... The REAL question is by iMacGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2ch has over 10x the traffic Slashdot does - it's by far the biggest forum in the world. So, uh, yes?

    --
    Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
  10. Re:If it isn't local, it isn't a BBS. - bullshit! by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You've obviously forgotten the whole point of a BBS: It's local to a specific area, usually designated by an area code. I once made roughly that same argument - to argue why BBSes were good and newsgroups were bad. But, honestly, I was probably just making that assertion because I ran a BBS that didn't have newsgroups, and someone else ran one that did...

    Anyway, I think that assertion is dead wrong. I sure as hell wasn't "local to a specific area" by choice - it was just because of the economic realities of amateur computer networking in that era. BBSes were local because that was the only affordable option. There's nothing inherent about a BBS that requires it to be local, it's just that when run over POTS it worked out that way - because otherwise, for anything you might actually want to do on a BBS, you'd quickly wind up racking up hundreds of dollars in long-distance fees.

    If their local nature was an inherent part of BBSes, then why did software authors try to overcome that? (For instance, networking the message boards of different BBSes together, propagating the messages with a nightly dial-out script...)

    The technical limitations of most BBSes back in the day were consequences of economic factors, not conscious design choices. Nowadays, online forums are generally "local" to shared interests rather than shared geography. I find I have a lot more in common with computer programmers in the California or modelers in the Philippines than I do with a lot of people who happen to live in the same calling area as I do...
    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  11. Re:But... The REAL question is by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Troll"? It's basic facts. Slashdot is a far smaller site than 2channel.

  12. Re:why are people reacting to its simplicity? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    are you forgetting google and its text only ads? i think there were people who scoffed at that too. i mean who didn't love flashing banner ads in 1999? are you forgetting craigslist? i mean if anything, craigslist proves you need flash flashing everywhere to be a successful website in the usa, right?

    I can think of another popular site which is similarly stone-aged in its technology. You can't post images. Or Flash. There's a very tight limit on how much you can put in your signature. You can't edit your posts. You can't even have an avatar. At all. They've only lately been rewriting the site to use contemporary web technologies, to bring it out of the nineties; many of the users complained vehemently, and it still doesn't look quite right.

    And yet I reckon 100% of Slashdot regulars use this site... regularly.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  13. Re:Waaaaaaah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    lurk moar

  14. Re:OMG!!!! He's missed the boat! by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe that's why he has so many visitors, Web 2.0 and java-/ecmascripts suck.

  15. Re:OMG!!!! He's missed the boat! by PenguSven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    javascript/ecmascript doesnt suck, but rather the way it's generally used sucks.
    people don't say the sun sucks because it causes cancer, while enabling life on earth. they say "don't be a moron, put on sunscreen/hat/etc"
    client-side scripting in the web environment is just a tool, like a hammer or a screwdriver or an alligator. how a developer/designer uses it can often be described as criminal but that doesn't make the tool the problem. (unless you consider said developer/designer the tool)

    --
    What is...?
  16. Re:Japan just likes it 1.0 by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That doesn't sound much quicker than using T9 predictive text in English (or, presumably, other languages written in the roman alphabet). (Bank is just "2265", for those of you who don't T9 - yes, I know direct comparisons aren't very meaningful.) Capitals are automatic at the start of a sentence, you only need to do them manually for proper nouns. Anyway, it can't be that hard to write Japanese on a phone given people write entire novels on their phones.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  17. Re:Japan just likes it 1.0 by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Simply put, you don't have to type out the whole word. As you enter characters, the phone will display a list of words it thinks you want. All you have to do is enter the first few characters, then pick the word from the list. If it is a word you use often, it will appear at the top of the list. This makes entering common phrases a snap.

    ... What, your phone doesn't do that in English? Is this another backwards American thing? Mine does exactly what you describe, and so did the one I had before it, and the one before that, going back to time immemorial.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  18. Re:Funny? Insightful! by slim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The latin alphabet is no more "normal" than, say, the Korean alphabet. That's syllabary, not an alphabet.

    Actually, Korean script is really cool. Each fixed-width one-syllable symbol contains alphabetic elements that tell you how it sounds. I really recommend reading up on it.