Help Slashdot Test Our New Data Center
After many years of living in California, Slashdot is preparing to move to a new data center in Chicago, and we need your help. We have our new site running a dump of our database from a few days ago. You can hit it at beta.slashdot.org. Please go there, post comments, submit stories, and do whatever you do normally. Or maybe abnormally — run crawlers, write poll spamming robots or something. If you find any crazy issues, please submit them to our sourceforge tracker. If you're curious, the new system features 18 2x quad-core 2.3 GHz webservers each with 8 gigs of RAM, and 4 quad-core 2.3 GHz databases with 16 gigs of RAM.
I couldn't create a new account on beta.slashdot.org
Did you read the history of Slashdot when it hit 10 year anniversary mark? I think someone should go read and stop asking silly questions.
I get 10ms
Apache benchmarker. If you have the right packages installed (e.g. 'apache2-utils' on Debian) it certainly exists on any Linux distro worth its salt.
The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
On the Web servers, the specs are
Dual Quad Core Intel E5345 with RAID 1 of 2xSATA drives
On the Database boxes
Single Quad Core Intel E5345 with RAID 5 of 7xSAS drives w/ a hot spare
All machines are 2xGigE connected to cabinet switches which are 10G connected to our cores and our Dual 10G uplinks
- U
wow, 5 fewer hops to me, with about half the latency
Of course it will. If you're not curious you're not getting anywhere close to your normal share of fun.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
$ lynx -dump -head http://beta.slashdot.org/ | grep Server
Server: Apache/1.3.41 (Unix) mod_perl/1.31-rc4
So that's one question answered :-)
I'm in NYC, dropped latency rather impressively from 96ms to 36ms, dropped hops from 16 to 13, all depends on where you live and what networks your traffic is going over
"goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
I remember a USENIX talk about Altavista's servers and they had many more web servers than DB servers (like 3 to 1).
So I'm not surprised.
JP http://www.wearerite.com
And that's only if they're at 100% load, which they won't be except in rare cases.
They're not being hosted out of CI Host, they're being hosted out of Savvis.
Looks like they're running OpenBSD of some sort.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Netcraft thinks it's an F5 BIG-IP device, which probably means that they've got a big, fancy load balancer. If my memory doesn't fail me, F5's appliance OS is BSD based.
I get 16 hops from sweden on both. latency is about 40 ms less
try mtr
People using html in email should be shot.
They're all quad core machines. 18 of 'em have 2 quad core processors, and the other 4 lack the extra processor but get more RAM.
It's sorta like, there's 22 guys. 18 of 'em ain't missing nothing, but the other four only have one nut but have more endurance. Though the analogy is a bit off.
Latency! That ain't latency:
Figures courtesy of tracepath. The packets have paddled across the Pacific.
Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button