Technically Pi equals 3.14 because they both start with 3.1
-- Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
But what we really want to know is...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
Will it run on windows?
Re:Astounding...
by
Mad+Merlin
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Are you serious? A release candidate for a random open source project is released, and that's news you care about?
Perhaps if you were paying attention, you'd know that Wine 1.0 has been 15 years in the making. Furthermore, Wine is hardly "a random open source project", Wine reaching 1.0 is a very significant milestone.
-- Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Re:Catch 22 situation
by
SanityInAnarchy
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I think its mostly because of some "hacks" used by lazy/clever/performance programmer, but therefore very intolerant to a "windows-like" environment. Do you have anything to back this up?
Because Windows itself is incredibly hackish, especially when it comes to backwards compatibility. If Wine was simply striving to be a good Win32 implementation, they'd be pretty much done already -- someone developing an app, from the ground up, to be able to run on Windows and Wine shouldn't have too much more trouble than someone designing a web app, from the ground up, to run in IE and Firefox.
But Wine strives for bug-for-bug compatibility. There are a lot of bugs in Windows, and a lot of apps depend on those bugs.
I hope Wine will get to the point, where it's influence will force programmers to stick to the specifications, as his/her boss is asking:" but will it also run under Wine???". That assumes something else -- that Windows sticks to the specs. On top of all of the above, Windows doesn't stick to the specs.
Slashdot Mirror
Technically Pi equals 3.14 because they both start with 3.1
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
Will it run on windows?
Perhaps if you were paying attention, you'd know that Wine 1.0 has been 15 years in the making. Furthermore, Wine is hardly "a random open source project", Wine reaching 1.0 is a very significant milestone.
Game! - Where the stick is mightier than the sword!
You could just e-mail yourself the link. Not that this post has hurt your karma any, just a suggestion.
I do that for trivial things I want to share between Windows/Linux/different computers (ie, things not worth getting out a thumb drive for.)
Why not link to: http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/winetest-latest.exe instead? Isn't that guaranteed to be the latest?
Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Because Windows itself is incredibly hackish, especially when it comes to backwards compatibility. If Wine was simply striving to be a good Win32 implementation, they'd be pretty much done already -- someone developing an app, from the ground up, to be able to run on Windows and Wine shouldn't have too much more trouble than someone designing a web app, from the ground up, to run in IE and Firefox.
But Wine strives for bug-for-bug compatibility. There are a lot of bugs in Windows, and a lot of apps depend on those bugs. I hope Wine will get to the point, where it's influence will force programmers to stick to the specifications, as his/her boss is asking:" but will it also run under Wine???". That assumes something else -- that Windows sticks to the specs. On top of all of the above, Windows doesn't stick to the specs.
Don't thank God, thank a doctor!