Slashdot Mirror


Amusement Park Bans PDAs and Smartphones

Ant writes in with news that an amusement park in the UK is trying out a ban on smartphones and PDAs, with the intent to enable families actually to have fun together. The press release says that from May 25 to June 1, adults found using a PDA will be asked to drop it off at a "PDA Drop Off Zone" — no word on what happens if they refuse. But both the Sun and BoingBoing, which picked up their brief story, strike a more ominous note with the claim that "special wardens" will confiscate the devices. If the experiment is deemed a success the park may make the ban permanent.

18 of 474 comments (clear)

  1. I understand their point... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but stepping up and taking away someone's personal property is nothing but thuggery.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    1. Re:I understand their point... by Mike1024 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      stepping up and taking away someone's personal property is nothing but thuggery. Perhaps, but bear in mind they can retrieve their PDA when they leave, and one can avoid the issue altogether by leaving your PDA at home, turning it off, or just plain not using it.

      The fact is, private amusement parks can have rules, and can ask you to leave if you refuse to follow them. This is just an example of that.

      If you're so very important that you can't turn your blackberry off for a day, you have the option of not visiting Alton Towers. If you really are that important, maybe you should turn your PDA off anyway, so your employers can be prepared for if you ever die or move jobs.
      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    2. Re:I understand their point... by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...but stepping up and taking away someone's personal property is nothing but thuggery. property, privacy, rights, entitlements, money, etc... welcome to .uk. Enjoy your stay Oh, fuck off. Seriously, this is the kind of kneejerk reaction that detracts from the damages to civil liberties that are happening in the UK.

      It's a minor story about a crap gimmick Alton Towers are using to get some publicity, and it's being presented here as an "OMG!!!!! They're taking away our rights!!!!!!!!11111" story.

      Aside from the fact it's a private amusement park (not a pseudo-public space like a shopping centre), it's not even being done for the usual surveillance-state bullshit "pedos might take photos of our children" type reasons. (*)

      You don't like it? Don't go to fucking Alton Towers! I wouldn't...

      (*) Given the popularity of using pedos to justify every ludicrous measure, if this isn't the reason being given in public, then it sure as hell isn't the true reason either.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:I understand their point... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They're not taking anything from anyone - it's just a little marketing gimmick accompanying a little 'family friendly' advice.

      Parents are being ASKED to relinquish/put away their PDAs etc, in order to spend 'quality' time with their children.

      The article says 'no word on what will happen if they refuse' because nothing will happen. There's no story here, no news, just an advertisement...

      ...and no need for any nerd to get their knickers in a knot. ;)

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  2. Smart... by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So the policy allows kids phones for safety purposes.

    Who are they going to call? The parents without the cell phones?

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
  3. Oh Please... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but stepping up and taking away someone's personal property is nothing but thuggery.
    No it's not. They have a policy at a private amusement. I f you don't like it, you can "recreate" elsewhere.
    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Oh Please... by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as they have a huge sign posted out front BEFORE I PAY that's just fine with me. I would just take my money elsewhere.

    2. Re:Oh Please... by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A local store has a sign they hang up that you can only see as you're leaving, which says "we reserve the right to inspect bags". Security guards ask nicely, but I walk past them with a sneer. How do I get away with it? They _don't_ have that right to begin with, so they can't reserve it.
      A manager at the store blocked my path once, immediately after I purchased something, and asked to see my bag.. the bag the check-out clerk just gave me. I told him to get out of my way or I'm calling the police. He first looked like he'd be happy to have the police there until a little spark went off in his little reptilian brain and he got out of my way.

      If I hang up a sign in my house saying "I reserve the right to cavity search" or "I reserve the right to confiscate your property", it doesn't mean I suddenly am exempt from laws against assault or theft perpetrated against people I asked onto my property.

    3. Re:Oh Please... by howlingfrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So ? A policy at whatever place cannot override the law. If I have a policy that says I'm allowed to kill you on my private property, I'm still going away for murder if I do.

      That's only vaguely true, and not even vaguely relevant. The owners of private property have every right, legally and ethically, to require visitors to that property to agree to (practically) any terms they want. The visitors are free to leave if they find the terms unacceptable. I can't imagine any US or UK court upholding terms that allow illegal behavior, but for anything short of that, what do you think "private property" means?

      And in this case, there's nothing remotely illegal about the terms being set. The amusement park operators are simply not allowing certain devices on their property, and offering a (free?) storage service for those disallowed devices. Visitors can leave their smartphones at home, or in the car, or in the park-provided storage. If you don't like those choices, don't go to that park.

      The real issues are:

      1. Would you personally visit an amusement park with this policy?
      2. Is this policy a sound business decision?
      My answers are no to both, as I assume yours are, but this is ABSOLUTELY NOT a legal/civil liberties issue.
      --
      The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
    4. Re:Oh Please... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, he doesn't have the right to stop you. But, at the point that he stepped out of the way, he would have been fully within his rights to inform you that you were not permitted to shop there in the future, and that attempts to reenter the store would be treated as trespass.

    5. Re:Oh Please... by frdmfghtr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you are seen using a Palm, iPaq or other personal digital assistant or smartphone, the special wardens will take it away from you."
      My question is: what if you are using it to communicate with other members of your party in the park? Suppose you have a copy of the park map on it?

      Smartphones/PDAs are not just used for business, after all.
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    6. Re:Oh Please... by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think we're making too much of it. It's no different ethically or legally from movie theaters that ban outside food.

  4. Re:Sniff, sniff.. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, I can think of a few people who would actually enforce a policy that stupid, but...

    First question: Are they confiscating all cell phones, or only smartphones?

    If it's only smartphones, it's a liveable policy -- provided you can buy everyone a non-smartphone. It's still moronic that they're trying to enforce fun -- it's not like it spoils anyone else's fun if you want to spoil your trip by playing Solitaire on your smartphone the whole time.

    If it's all phones, well, you've just eliminated a useful tool for finding lost kids, or for preventing kids from getting lost. It's all well and good to say "We'll meet here at 5:30," but it's nice to be able to call if they don't make it.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  5. You're all missing the point by xaxa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The word "ban" isn't really what they're doing.

    "Amusement Park Provides Secure Drop-Off Point for PDAs and Smartphones" would be more like it. To advertise this service they have a kid dressed as a policeman "banning" people from using PDAs and pointing them towards the drop-off point.

  6. Re:Just don't go. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of their damned business, first of all. That's between him and his family.

    And second, being callable doesn't mean you'll necessarily take a call. My phone is always on, and always on me, short of airplane travel -- but I'm only rarely called.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  7. Re:Sniff, sniff.. by shilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Christ, wouldja take a minute to think even briefly before typing. What are you on about, saying, "it's not like it spoils anyone else's fun if you want to spoil your trip by playing Solitaire on your smartphone the whole time"? This policy is not aimed at 19-year-old geeks who've turned up by themselves, it's aimed at parents. And yes it really will spoil your 10-year-old's day if you're playing Solitaire instead of joining them on the rides.

  8. What? But I'm a Doctor, on call...! by misterhypno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Special wardens will confiscate such devices" as a possible outcome.

    How will those who are doctors, law enforcement officials and such who are on call or other emergency personnel be able to remain in touch with their call-in stations then and who are required to carry such devices (and may even be issued them as part of their standard equipment)?

    And isn't that called "theft?" Or, at least violation of personal property under UK law?

    While I appreciate the idea of not having to be interrupted at every turn by some idiot either playing a video game or answering a mindless "WHASSUP?!" call in the middle of a show, there should be some better way to do this.

    And what happens when someone loses their claim ticket or, worse, the park loses their smart device? The cost to the park will be far in excess of the "social savings" this ban might give them.

    From this side of the pond, it's just another sign that every petty administrator, everywhere, wants to control a little slice of the lives that come into their sphere of influence.

    They are going to have a LOT of very angry people to contend with when they try this because, more and more, smart devices are becoming the norm, rather than the exception. What a wonderful way to turn the happiest place on earth into a focus for seething animosity!

    Well done, park officious officials!

  9. Criminal damage by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if they think that you are stupid or not, cutting your tie in half is criminal damage ... I am surprised that someone has not called the cops out on them.