Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

UK Proposes Banning Computer Generated Abuse

Posted by samzenpus on from the not-even-with-unicorns dept.

peterprior writes "The UK Justice Minister is planning to outlaw computer generated images and drawings of child sex abuse. While photographs and videos of child sex abuse are already illegal, undoubtedly to protect children from being exploited by these acts, what children will be protected by this new law? If there is no actual child involved is the law merely protecting against the possibility of offenders committing future crimes against real children?"

7 of 740 comments (clear)

  1. Pedophiles by NoobixCube · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Pedophiles make me sick. The sooner a law is instated that allows us to slaughter the lot of them, the better. Computer generated child porn is still child porn. Snuff movies are still snuff movies when nobody really dies. It's the idea of it, not the act.

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    1. Re:Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Everyone, just stop paying attention to this guy. He's an admitted loon.

    2. Re:Pedophiles by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sadly with the number of perverts extant you just might draw an unwanted guest to that garden.

      You think some pervert is going to come into your garden and try to fuck your statue? Do you really think that's a likely occurrence? Do you not let your wife or children go into the garden for fear of the big bad perverts?

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  2. It's about psychology by Tarcastil · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Allowing these images may make people think of child sex abuse as semi-normal if they can view them at any time without any repercussions.

    1. Re:It's about psychology by Tarcastil · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Thanks for glancing at my argument. Please read it next time.

  3. Re:logical progression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    times like this make me wish i could sage!

    Dude, show me the "wiring" that makes one attracted to a group. It's like some code, rite, and instead of woman oops, child got compiled instead. Yeah.

    Now, it's all fine and good for me to ask this of you, and you'll say blah blah i don't know bout them brains but let me tell you about wiring! and let me tell you about the ways things are! the things - theyre... theyre these ways, you see!

    If I asked a neuroscientist to show me where the "sexual wiring" was, they'd calmly explain that things don't work like that.

    God I can't believe that I wasted my time typing this out, you disgusting piece of shit

    I cant believe your parents wasted all that time, either

    (on the off chance) I can't believe that the orphanage wasted their time on you. And it WAS a waste.

  4. peterprior must be a paedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    And leave it to /. to stick up for paedos that want to jackoff to kiddie porn cgi and like all good paedos do, move on to the real thing