Slashdot Mirror


Ulteo Shows Linux-Windows Crossover Potential

An anonymous reader writes "With Wubi and now the Ulteo Virtual Desktop, we're starting to see examples of the potential 'cross-over' appeal of Linux to Windows users. Ulteo gets a nice look from Channelweb, which writes, 'Considering that this is not even a version 1 beta, we have high hopes for Ulteo Virtual Desktop. It allows Linux novices to dip their toes into the water without any fear, and lets Linux pros use their favorite applications when they are forced to be in a Windows environment.' This also seems to play into comments by Mark Shuttleworth, who has said the Ubuntu community may want to think about how it can start appealing to Windows users."

18 of 70 comments (clear)

  1. There are better ways by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you put a stable platform on an unstable one, people who are unfamiliar will not realize that the new one is not the problem.

    If you put a secure platform on one that is generally more insecure, people will still think it may have gotten a virus through it because they don't understand.

    The only thing you are doing is getting people introduced to common applications like Open Office, Firefox and other more commonly used OO applications and there are far better ways to do this than with something that a common consumer will probably never use; if you want them to start using Open Office and Firefox, burn a bunch of Disks and nice labels and start a campaign on 'back to school' periods when everyone is shopping for their kids and college students and stand outside that Mac Store or the BestBuy handing out OpenOffice and Firefox CD's.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:There are better ways by hansraj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree with your comments that this is far from the ideal way of using linux, I disagree with your assessment that it serves little to no purpose. Once a windows user gets used to the KDE task bar, and then eventually with the whole lot of programs that come with it, it would be easier for them to totally abandon Windows. Of course not everyone will switch boats but a good enough chunk should :)

      World domination, naturally, is the next step.

    2. Re:There are better ways by MachoBidniz · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a KDE clone for Windows already? Can you post a link? .... In any case, I would appreciate a link. http://windows.kde.org/
    3. Re:There are better ways by hansraj · · Score: 3, Interesting
      From the linked page:

      KDE on Windows is mostly in an alpha state, so not suitable for day to day use yet. The parent poster made it sound as if it was ready to use. Anyway, thanks for the link. I wasn't aware of it.
    4. Re:There are better ways by Foofoobar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I use Windows too and agree it has been MORE solid but I also use Mac and Debian Linux as well and in comparison, side-by-side... it's buggy, unstable, virus ridden and hackable. Sure props are due in them coming a long way in improving but they have a fundamentally flawed underlying design and need to fix that, the file system and several other core problems before they can stabilize the entire system.

      Speaking as someone who uses all three platforms, there's a reason why Mac and Linux people make these complaints when talking about Windows. It's because it's fairly true.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    5. Re:There are better ways by argent · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know it isn't the norm to compliment Windows, but Windows has been solid since 2k (minus Vista).

      Well, I spent 20 years as a network administrator, and while the NT-derived Windows has been pretty solid, it's never reached the point where I can say the only time I've had to reboot is to upgrade software, nor have I been able to treat the Windows desktops I've supported as cavalierly as UNIX. And, too, the deep security issues in Win32 haven't been seriously addressed yet.

      In my new job attempting to remove Outlook and downgrade it to something that wasn't infested with the Vista cult broke my computer so badly I had to get it reimaged. Not only shouldn't this be rocket science, but I'm metaphorically a rocket scientist and it's still too hard.

      I've seen this at home, too: my daughter's Windows 2000 desktop had to be reinstalled every six months because she broke something. She's gone about 3 years on her Mac mini without incident.

    6. Re:There are better ways by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Informative

      It shouldn't. I agree. But I couldn't say Windows never locked up... I listed the only things that I knew to do so.

      Prioritizing IO context is pretty tricky stuff. Even linux has recently had drama with the scheduler being replaced and augmented to no end.

      Also, try/catch is to catch something that is throw()'n. A hardware exception requires SEH, which is expensive.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:There are better ways by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Windows is no longer synonymous with the 9x line. The digs and pokes at it crashing and locking up just don't stick anymore.


      O Rly? Last week I finally got my best friend switched over from XP to xubuntu. What made her switch after 11+ years of using Windows? Stability issues. XP was acting up for her on a semi-daily basis -- blue screens, freezes, crashes. She believes MS has "downgraded" XP via updates on purpose because they want to force Vista down everyone's throats, and I'm sure she's right. Until last month, she was perfectly happy with XP, and was not at all anti-MS. I don't know if you've simply been lucky or if you're astroturfing, but I can assure you if your experience was the norm then the memes would reflect that, rather than the polar opposite of that. :)
      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    8. Re:There are better ways by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are wrong. It appears most slashdotters have a rabid and unreasoning hatred of all things Microsoft.


      It is you who is in error. Some may be rabid, but "unreasoning"? We got no end of reasons. Functionality/lack thereof, economics, politics...

      Ever heard the expresson "where there is smoke there is fire"?

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
  2. Re:cygwin by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because this is a relatively painless way for "mom & pop" to try Linux. There's no way my dad could "just port and compile with cygwin".

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. If you REALLY want to help by russlar · · Score: 2, Informative

    if you want them to start using Open Office and Firefox, burn a bunch of Disks and nice labels and start a campaign on 'back to school' periods when everyone is shopping for their kids and college students and stand outside that Mac Store or the BestBuy handing out OpenOffice and Firefox CD's. Outstanding idea!

    But if you really want to help open-source projects, do this with CD's purchased from Mozilla and OpenOffice.org. That way, the products get the public awareness, and the developers of the products get the funding they need to continue developing them.
    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
  4. Re:cygwin by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I kinda concur (though it looks like you incurred the wrath of the moderators there).

    Linux as an OS is not at all hard to use. Most people who don't figure it out probably aren't doing any better on their current Windows system. The apps are where people run into issues. If someone is already using Firefox on Windows, then that's one less thing to get used to if they "convert". It helps if you can do this a little at a time.

    If you'd look at my desktop (a Windows machine) at work I've got it setup with Firefox, Thunderbird, GIMP, MySQL (with HeidiSQL GUI), PostgreSQL (with pgAdmin III GUI), 7-zip, Pan, Songbird, Filezilla, etc. There are a few proprietary apps that we use here that aren't available for Linux that I use too, but for the most part, all of the "everyday use" stuff is open source.

    Get people used to using Windows machines like that and it'll be cake moving them over to a Linux machine running the same stuff. No need on wasting time on OS's running on top of each other , which BTW, confuses the living HELL out of your average user. Having recently setup some users with RDP sessions that they could use to work with machines off-site, I can say that the whole concept of them working on different systems but on the same keyboard and display just boggles their poor little minds.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  5. Been done by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's always handy to have a DSL install on your USB stick. Linux on windows has been done, it's just much more preferable to use wine on linux and never look back.

  6. This will not boost linux kernel adoption by Pausanias · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The linux-on-windows solutions (cygwin was the first, now the more user-friendly ones) present an interesting dilemma. Most windows users I know hate the windows interface. If given an easy way to try gnome/KDE, they may just like it so much that they'd decide to ditch Windows altogether and move all the way to Linux. These installers allow them to reassure themselves that everything they need to do in Windows can be easily done in Linux as well.

    However, my feeling is that these people are outnumbered by the people who will not give up Windows. They will not give up Windows because it runs their games, or because it runs their proprietary applications, or simply because complex Microsoft Office files still look wrong in OpenOffice. These people, I think, are in the majority. Even if they like GNOME/KDE, they will still stick with Windows to get the best of both worlds. This is especially true if they can run GNOME/KDE within Windows without rebooting.

    That is both good news and bad news. Many free software applications will get a boost out of this, but the Linux kernel unfortunately will not.

  7. Linux to run cross-platform apps? by radarsat1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    While I think this is sorta cool, I find their choice of applications a little odd. Here's the list from their web page:

    • Firefox (Flash & Java): runs on Windows
    • OpenOffice.org: runs on Windows
    • KPdf: Probably will run on Windows when KDE4 is out?
    • Kopete: Same as above?
    • Skype: Runs on Windows
    • Thunderbird + Enigmail: runs on Windows
    • Gimp and Digikam: Gimp runs on Windows
    • Inkscape: runs on Windows
    • Scribus: runs on Windows


    So.. granted, I personally think many of these applications run better and more naturally on Linux, but still it's kind of funny to see this list. (Not sure what will happen with the KDE applications.)

    If they wanted to show off Linux applications that don't have Windows ports they might have chosen maybe "KOffice", or "Gnumeric", or "Evolution". I dunno.
  8. Based on colinux, similar to andLinux by josath · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using andLinux for a while now, it's great for running linux apps under windows. Essentially it's a patched linux kernel that actually runs at the same time as the windows kernel, with a small manager which gives time to both windows and linux. Since it's not virtualized, performance is great. Display is done by running Xming, a win32 X11 server in rootless mode, which then connects over the virtual network to the linux host.

    colinux itself is very user-unfriendly, but andLinux has a nice simple installer and launcher that lets you launch linux apps as if they were native windows ones. It's based off of an Ubuntu distro, so you can use apt-get and run pretty much any linux app. A few things don't work that well such as fast paced games, playing videos with mplayer etc, due to running over X11 over sockets with zero acceleration. But any standard desktop app should work fine.

    From their site, Ulteo is also based on colinux, and it appears they go even further than andLinux in making it very userfriendly. But with userfriendlyness often comes with a lack of control, so if you are a linux power-user I'd highly recommend andLinux. It's great to be able to pull up a Konsole instead of having to use the lame windows command prompt (or the sucky cygwin stuff). The only thing that's really missing is being able to launch windows apps from a linux script, but that doesn't come up too often.

    --
    sig? uhh, umm, ok
  9. There are several better ways by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yea, I see no good reason for this. It's trying to be Linux, but warns you against installing what you want or need for fear of breaking it and wants you to just use the set of applications that they have picked. Many of them are already available compiled to run directly under Windows, so there's not much point in monkeying around with an extra Linux layer and the restrictions of this "special distro" just to run a preselected set of applications. If there is really a reason to support Xp and (ugh) Vista, then the effort may have been better spent by porting more OS apps to the Windows platform rather than doing this.

    If you do want Linux and not apps ported to Windows, and want to run both Linux and Windows at once, far better would be to install the free VMware player and install Debian (or your personal choice of the many Linux religions to pick from) and then you really can install and run whatever Linux apps that you want. And, of course, the choice to run Windows under Linux rather than Linux under windows ramains an option for many, although I doubt it would be acceptable to many of the Gamers out there.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  10. Its the YOTLDA... by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Year Of The Linux Desktop ... Again!