Slashdot Mirror


Prototype EU Airplane Spy Cams Watch For Facecrime

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "You can't make stuff like this up. The EU is actually testing a prototype system of cameras in airplanes to monitor passengers' facial expressions in order to detect both terrorism and 'air rage.' The Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment (SAFEE) project used an Airbus A380 fuselage with six wide-angle cameras to watch for people running or loitering near the cockpit door, as well as a camera in the back of every seat to watch for facecrime like sweating too much, or acting nervous. But that's okay, because the system won't alert anyone until it sees a 'combination of signs,' instead of just one stray expression, or they might accidentally catch a lot of people who are afraid of flying or of being watched."

6 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. Right, by abolitiontheory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because perpetrators wouldn't ever be calm or completely resigned to their fate/choice.

    1. Re:Right, by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. I love this theory that someone who is mentally prepared to kill themselves is going to break out in a cold sweat beforehand and give themselves away.

      How many people are going to be labeled as terrorists because their facial expressions show annoyance due to the screaming baby with the ear infection sitting directly behind them?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Right, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      he would guarantee them 72 cute virgin girls all to themselves for eternity in paradise. Nobody ever said that the virgins would be cute. Imagine the surprise when the virgins all turn out to be slashdotters.
    3. Re:Right, by Hoplite3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it's perfectly reasonable that such a face cam could flag some terrorists, even if it doesn't flag them all. From that limited perspective, it's an effective tool.

      But I think it's shit for two other reasons that often don't enter into the analysis of the buerocrats:

      1) It dehumanizes the passengers. I'm willing to accept some risks so that I'm not monitored by computers. I think many people feel the same.

      2) It will CERTAINLY generate many false positives. Then some functionary will have to check out each false positive. That person's time will be spent tending the bad-face-machine instead of being more intelligent about watching for threats. This sort of thing ultimately makes me less safe.

      And for a good example of (2) in action right now: the liquid and gel restrictions. I was flying to meet some friends for a hiking trip. I checked by big pack, but decided to carry on my daypack since it was just a small backpack like I usually carry-on. But I had previously packed my daypack with usual hiking stuff, including a 3" knife and a tube of sunscreen. When they pulled me aside at the xray, I immediately realized I had inadvertently taken my nice knife to the x-ray ... but my fear was for nothing. They were so worried about my 8 oz tube of sunscreen that they completely missed the knife. I threw out the tube and carried my knife on board. Needless to say, I checked everything on the flight back :)

      --
      Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
  2. Re:white out by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whiting out your face won't make a difference, I'd go with the old trusty tinfoil hat.

    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  3. Re:Like flying much? by pablomme · · Score: 5, Funny

    the competition will be trains, automobiles and the Internet Yeah, I too prefer to email myself everywhere these days.
    --
    The state you are in while your HEAD is detached... - wait, what?