Slashdot Mirror


Intel & Micron Show 34-nm, 32-Gbit Flash Memory Chip

Lucas123 writes "IM Flash Technologies, a joint venture between Intel and Micron, announced it has developed a 32-gigabit NAND flash memory chip that is expected to enable the production of cheaper solid-state drives with twice the storage capacity of today's products. The 34-nanometer, multi-level chip is smaller than Intel's latest CPUs. Samples will be available in June with production by the end of the year."

8 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. The Price of Flash by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

    FWIW, another article covering this same press-release noted that most flash costs $2.50/Mbit to manufacture, but this new stuff by Intel costs just under $1/Mbit to manufacture. So the rapid downward spiral of flash storage pricing should continue for at least the short term.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:The Price of Flash by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Informative

      That doesn't sound right. Perhaps you mean $/Gbyte?

    2. Re:The Price of Flash by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative
      Probably this:

      (...) Jim Handy, an analyst with Objective Analysis (...) "At a die size [they are using], the price of a 32Gb chip will be just shy of $4, which works out to about 99 cents/GB. The companies will be the first to break the $1/GB barrier with this product," Handy said. Today's NAND prices are hovering near $2.50 per gigabyte, Handy said. So an external analyst said thar, nor Intel/Micron. It sounds rather nice if you can get a good boot disk for 1$/GB+margins though. The bulk multimedia will probably still go on HDDs though, but I'd definately get one at those prices.
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:The Price of Flash by matt21811 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone can check the spot price for flash anytime by looking at this site:

      http://www.dramexchange.com/

      Scroll down to the flash section.
      SLC is the good stuff used in the big fast SSD's you get from people like Apple.
      MLC is the slower, less long lasting, stuff commonly used in thumb drives.
      $2.08 for a Gigabyte in MLC
      $6.70 for a Gigabyte of SLC

      If you want to know the long term price improvement rate for flash, you can join that site for $1000 a year or if you want the cheap version, I've been tracking retail flash (MLC) prices for 9 years at my site here:
      http://www.mattscomputertrends.com/flashmemory.html

  2. Re:Phirst Spot by tirerim · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because smaller is more energy efficient, which is useful on a number of levels: for one, it saves electricity, and it also means that the chips produce less heat, which lets them run better.

  3. Memory is almost always ahead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Memory is almost always ahead of the curve when it comes to silicon manufacturing. These were the guys who were at 55nm when the processor industry was temporarily stuck at 90nm.

    All kinds of memory can use smaller processes because the logic is much simpler; you're basically laying the same thing out over and over and over again on a die. For the same exact reason, most companies use SRAMs to test their processes before moving up to higher level logic like processors.

  4. Re:A Bit Of Confusion With Flash Sizes by Frenchman113 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can combine them. Or make larger chips. The achievement in TFA is significant because of the storage density achieved.

  5. Re:A Bit Of Confusion With Flash Sizes by SQL+Error · · Score: 4, Informative

    Multiple dies stacked in a single package. Very common in the flash business.